药物对水生动物行为影响的证据(EIPAAB):系统地图和开放获取数据库。

IF 3.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jake M Martin, Marcus Michelangeli, Michael G Bertram, Paul J Blanchfield, Jack A Brand, Tomas Brodin, Bryan W Brooks, Daniel Cerveny, Kate N Fergusson, Malgorzata Lagisz, Lea M Lovin, Isaac Y Ligocki, Shinichi Nakagawa, Shiho Ozeki, Natalia Sandoval-Herrera, Kendall R Scarlett, Josefin Sundin, Hung Tan, Eli S J Thoré, Bob B M Wong, Erin S McCallum
{"title":"药物对水生动物行为影响的证据(EIPAAB):系统地图和开放获取数据库。","authors":"Jake M Martin, Marcus Michelangeli, Michael G Bertram, Paul J Blanchfield, Jack A Brand, Tomas Brodin, Bryan W Brooks, Daniel Cerveny, Kate N Fergusson, Malgorzata Lagisz, Lea M Lovin, Isaac Y Ligocki, Shinichi Nakagawa, Shiho Ozeki, Natalia Sandoval-Herrera, Kendall R Scarlett, Josefin Sundin, Hung Tan, Eli S J Thoré, Bob B M Wong, Erin S McCallum","doi":"10.1186/s13750-025-00357-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the last decade, pharmaceutical pollution in aquatic ecosystems has emerged as a pressing environmental issue. Recent years have also seen a surge in scientific interest in the use of behavioural endpoints in chemical risk assessment and regulatory activities, underscoring their importance for fitness and survival. In this respect, data on how pharmaceuticals alter the behaviour of aquatic animals appears to have grown rapidly. Despite this, there has been a notable absence of systematic efforts to consolidate and summarise this field of study. To address this, our objectives were twofold: (1) to systematically identify, catalogue, and synthesise primary research articles on the effects of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour; and (2) to organise this information into a comprehensive open-access database for scientists, policymakers, and environmental managers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched two electronic databases (Web of Science and Scopus) and supplemented these with additional article sources. The search string followed a Population-Exposure-Comparison-Outcome framework to capture articles that used an aquatic organism (population) to test the effects of a pharmaceutical (exposure) on behaviour (outcome). Articles were screened in two stages: title and abstract, followed by full-text screening alongside data extraction. Decision trees were designed a priori to appraise eligibility at both stages. Information on study validity was collected but not used as a basis for inclusion. Data synthesis focused on species, compounds, behaviour, and quality themes and was enhanced with additional sources of metadata from online databases (e.g. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Taxonomy, PubChem, and IUCN Red List of Threatened Species).</p><p><strong>Review findings: </strong>We screened 5,988 articles, of which 901 were included in the final database, representing 1,739 unique species-by-compound combinations. The database includes data collected over 48 years (1974-2022), with most articles having an environmental focus (510) and fewer relating to medical and basic research topics (233 and 158, respectively). The database includes 173 species (8 phyla and 21 classes). Ray-finned fishes were by far the most common clade (75% of the evidence base), and most studies focused on freshwater compared to marine species (80.4% versus 19.6%). The database includes 426 pharmaceutical compounds; the most common groups were antidepressants (28%), antiepileptics (11%), and anxiolytics (10%). Evidence for the impacts on locomotion and boldness/anxiety behaviours were most commonly assessed. Almost all behaviours were scored in a laboratory setting, with only 0.5% measured under field conditions. Generally, we detected poor reporting and/or compliance with several of our study validity criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic map revealed a rapid increase in this research area over the past 15 years. We highlight multiple areas now suitable for quantitative synthesis and areas where evidence is lacking. We also highlight some pitfalls in method reporting and practice. More detailed reporting would facilitate the use of behavioural endpoints in aquatic toxicology studies, chemical risk assessment, regulatory management activities, and improve replicability. The EIPAAB database can be used as a tool for closing these knowledge and methodological gaps in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48621,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Evidence","volume":"14 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence of the impacts of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour (EIPAAB): a systematic map and open access database.\",\"authors\":\"Jake M Martin, Marcus Michelangeli, Michael G Bertram, Paul J Blanchfield, Jack A Brand, Tomas Brodin, Bryan W Brooks, Daniel Cerveny, Kate N Fergusson, Malgorzata Lagisz, Lea M Lovin, Isaac Y Ligocki, Shinichi Nakagawa, Shiho Ozeki, Natalia Sandoval-Herrera, Kendall R Scarlett, Josefin Sundin, Hung Tan, Eli S J Thoré, Bob B M Wong, Erin S McCallum\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13750-025-00357-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the last decade, pharmaceutical pollution in aquatic ecosystems has emerged as a pressing environmental issue. Recent years have also seen a surge in scientific interest in the use of behavioural endpoints in chemical risk assessment and regulatory activities, underscoring their importance for fitness and survival. In this respect, data on how pharmaceuticals alter the behaviour of aquatic animals appears to have grown rapidly. Despite this, there has been a notable absence of systematic efforts to consolidate and summarise this field of study. To address this, our objectives were twofold: (1) to systematically identify, catalogue, and synthesise primary research articles on the effects of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour; and (2) to organise this information into a comprehensive open-access database for scientists, policymakers, and environmental managers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched two electronic databases (Web of Science and Scopus) and supplemented these with additional article sources. The search string followed a Population-Exposure-Comparison-Outcome framework to capture articles that used an aquatic organism (population) to test the effects of a pharmaceutical (exposure) on behaviour (outcome). Articles were screened in two stages: title and abstract, followed by full-text screening alongside data extraction. Decision trees were designed a priori to appraise eligibility at both stages. Information on study validity was collected but not used as a basis for inclusion. Data synthesis focused on species, compounds, behaviour, and quality themes and was enhanced with additional sources of metadata from online databases (e.g. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Taxonomy, PubChem, and IUCN Red List of Threatened Species).</p><p><strong>Review findings: </strong>We screened 5,988 articles, of which 901 were included in the final database, representing 1,739 unique species-by-compound combinations. The database includes data collected over 48 years (1974-2022), with most articles having an environmental focus (510) and fewer relating to medical and basic research topics (233 and 158, respectively). The database includes 173 species (8 phyla and 21 classes). Ray-finned fishes were by far the most common clade (75% of the evidence base), and most studies focused on freshwater compared to marine species (80.4% versus 19.6%). The database includes 426 pharmaceutical compounds; the most common groups were antidepressants (28%), antiepileptics (11%), and anxiolytics (10%). Evidence for the impacts on locomotion and boldness/anxiety behaviours were most commonly assessed. Almost all behaviours were scored in a laboratory setting, with only 0.5% measured under field conditions. Generally, we detected poor reporting and/or compliance with several of our study validity criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic map revealed a rapid increase in this research area over the past 15 years. We highlight multiple areas now suitable for quantitative synthesis and areas where evidence is lacking. We also highlight some pitfalls in method reporting and practice. More detailed reporting would facilitate the use of behavioural endpoints in aquatic toxicology studies, chemical risk assessment, regulatory management activities, and improve replicability. The EIPAAB database can be used as a tool for closing these knowledge and methodological gaps in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Evidence\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924672/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-025-00357-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-025-00357-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近十年来,水生生态系统中的药物污染已成为一个紧迫的环境问题。近年来,科学家对在化学品风险评估和监管活动中使用行为端点的兴趣激增,强调了它们对健康和生存的重要性。在这方面,关于药物如何改变水生动物行为的数据似乎增长迅速。尽管如此,仍明显缺乏系统化的努力来巩固和总结这一研究领域。为了解决这个问题,我们的目标有两个:(1)系统地识别、编目和合成关于药物对水生动物行为影响的主要研究文章;(2)将这些信息组织成一个全面的开放获取数据库,供科学家、决策者和环境管理者使用。方法:系统检索两个电子数据库(Web of Science和Scopus),并补充其他文章来源。搜索字符串遵循种群-暴露-比较-结果框架,以捕获使用水生生物(种群)测试药物(暴露)对行为(结果)的影响的文章。文章的筛选分为两个阶段:标题和摘要,然后是全文筛选和数据提取。先验地设计了决策树来评估两个阶段的资格。收集了有关研究效度的信息,但未作为纳入的基础。数据综合集中于物种、化合物、行为和质量主题,并通过来自在线数据库(如国家生物技术信息中心(NCBI)分类、PubChem和IUCN濒危物种红色名录)的额外元数据来源得到增强。综述结果:我们筛选了5988篇文章,其中901篇被纳入最终数据库,代表了1739种独特的物种-化合物组合。该数据库包括48年来(1974-2022年)收集的数据,其中大多数文章关注环境(510篇),较少涉及医学和基础研究主题(分别为233篇和158篇)。该数据库包括173种(8门21纲)。鳍鱼是迄今为止最常见的进化分支(占证据基础的75%),大多数研究都集中在淡水物种上,而不是海洋物种(80.4%对19.6%)。该数据库包括426种药物化合物;最常见的是抗抑郁药(28%)、抗癫痫药(11%)和抗焦虑药(10%)。最常评估的是对运动和大胆/焦虑行为影响的证据。几乎所有的行为都在实验室环境中进行了评分,只有0.5%在现场条件下进行了测量。一般来说,我们发现报告和/或遵守我们的几个研究效度标准的情况不佳。结论:我们的系统地图显示,在过去的15年里,这一研究领域迅速增加。我们强调了现在适合定量综合的多个领域和缺乏证据的领域。我们还强调了方法报告和实践中的一些缺陷。更详细的报告将有助于在水生毒理学研究、化学品风险评估、管制管理活动中使用行为终点,并提高可复制性。将来,EIPAAB数据库可以用作弥补这些知识和方法差距的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence of the impacts of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour (EIPAAB): a systematic map and open access database.

Background: Over the last decade, pharmaceutical pollution in aquatic ecosystems has emerged as a pressing environmental issue. Recent years have also seen a surge in scientific interest in the use of behavioural endpoints in chemical risk assessment and regulatory activities, underscoring their importance for fitness and survival. In this respect, data on how pharmaceuticals alter the behaviour of aquatic animals appears to have grown rapidly. Despite this, there has been a notable absence of systematic efforts to consolidate and summarise this field of study. To address this, our objectives were twofold: (1) to systematically identify, catalogue, and synthesise primary research articles on the effects of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour; and (2) to organise this information into a comprehensive open-access database for scientists, policymakers, and environmental managers.

Methods: We systematically searched two electronic databases (Web of Science and Scopus) and supplemented these with additional article sources. The search string followed a Population-Exposure-Comparison-Outcome framework to capture articles that used an aquatic organism (population) to test the effects of a pharmaceutical (exposure) on behaviour (outcome). Articles were screened in two stages: title and abstract, followed by full-text screening alongside data extraction. Decision trees were designed a priori to appraise eligibility at both stages. Information on study validity was collected but not used as a basis for inclusion. Data synthesis focused on species, compounds, behaviour, and quality themes and was enhanced with additional sources of metadata from online databases (e.g. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Taxonomy, PubChem, and IUCN Red List of Threatened Species).

Review findings: We screened 5,988 articles, of which 901 were included in the final database, representing 1,739 unique species-by-compound combinations. The database includes data collected over 48 years (1974-2022), with most articles having an environmental focus (510) and fewer relating to medical and basic research topics (233 and 158, respectively). The database includes 173 species (8 phyla and 21 classes). Ray-finned fishes were by far the most common clade (75% of the evidence base), and most studies focused on freshwater compared to marine species (80.4% versus 19.6%). The database includes 426 pharmaceutical compounds; the most common groups were antidepressants (28%), antiepileptics (11%), and anxiolytics (10%). Evidence for the impacts on locomotion and boldness/anxiety behaviours were most commonly assessed. Almost all behaviours were scored in a laboratory setting, with only 0.5% measured under field conditions. Generally, we detected poor reporting and/or compliance with several of our study validity criteria.

Conclusions: Our systematic map revealed a rapid increase in this research area over the past 15 years. We highlight multiple areas now suitable for quantitative synthesis and areas where evidence is lacking. We also highlight some pitfalls in method reporting and practice. More detailed reporting would facilitate the use of behavioural endpoints in aquatic toxicology studies, chemical risk assessment, regulatory management activities, and improve replicability. The EIPAAB database can be used as a tool for closing these knowledge and methodological gaps in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Evidence
Environmental Evidence Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Evidence is the journal of the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE). The Journal facilitates rapid publication of evidence syntheses, in the form of Systematic Reviews and Maps conducted to CEE Guidelines and Standards. We focus on the effectiveness of environmental management interventions and the impact of human activities on the environment. Our scope covers all forms of environmental management and human impacts and therefore spans the natural and social sciences. Subjects include water security, agriculture, food security, forestry, fisheries, natural resource management, biodiversity conservation, climate change, ecosystem services, pollution, invasive species, environment and human wellbeing, sustainable energy use, soil management, environmental legislation, environmental education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信