Atul P Kulkarni, Shilpushp J Bhosale, Kushal R Kalvit, Swapna Cherian, Anjana M Shrivastava, Manoj R Gorade
{"title":"评价MACOCHA评分预测危重癌症患者插管困难:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Atul P Kulkarni, Shilpushp J Bhosale, Kushal R Kalvit, Swapna Cherian, Anjana M Shrivastava, Manoj R Gorade","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tracheal intubation (TI) is often needed in the intensive care unit (ICU) but can have disastrous consequences. The MACOCHA score was developed for prediction of difficult intubation (DI) in critically ill.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, we conducted this prospective, single-center observational study. Evaluated the ability of MACOCHA score to predict difficult intubation in our ICU. We included 500 adults undergoing TI in our ICU. We collected the demographic data, details of ICU admission, and intubation-related data for calculating MACOCHA score. We used Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 21) for analysis. The accuracy of MACOCHA score for predicting DI was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics was used to determine calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since complete dataset was available for 449/500 patients, we analyzed their data. Acute renal failure and shock were the most frequent reasons for TI. Ketamine and rocuronium were most commonly used drugs for TI. The incidence of DI was 13.5% (60/449). There were 30 patients whose Mallampati score was either III and IV, while 84 and 45 patients had severe hypoxemia and coma before TI, respectively. The AUROC curve for the MACOCHA score was 0.659 (confidence interval, 0.574-0.743), suggesting a moderate discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed moderate calibration (χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.142, with <i>p</i> = 0.208). One hundred and seventy-one (26.5%) complications occurred in the entire cohort. Some patients had multiple complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MACOCHA score showed moderate discrimination and calibration in predicting DI in our study.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kulkarni AP, Bhosale SJ, Kalvit KR, Cherian S, Shrivastava AM, Gorade MR. Evaluation of MACOCHA Score for predicting Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):208-214.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"29 3","pages":"208-214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of MACOCHA Score for Predicting Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Atul P Kulkarni, Shilpushp J Bhosale, Kushal R Kalvit, Swapna Cherian, Anjana M Shrivastava, Manoj R Gorade\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tracheal intubation (TI) is often needed in the intensive care unit (ICU) but can have disastrous consequences. The MACOCHA score was developed for prediction of difficult intubation (DI) in critically ill.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, we conducted this prospective, single-center observational study. Evaluated the ability of MACOCHA score to predict difficult intubation in our ICU. We included 500 adults undergoing TI in our ICU. We collected the demographic data, details of ICU admission, and intubation-related data for calculating MACOCHA score. We used Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 21) for analysis. The accuracy of MACOCHA score for predicting DI was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics was used to determine calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since complete dataset was available for 449/500 patients, we analyzed their data. Acute renal failure and shock were the most frequent reasons for TI. Ketamine and rocuronium were most commonly used drugs for TI. The incidence of DI was 13.5% (60/449). There were 30 patients whose Mallampati score was either III and IV, while 84 and 45 patients had severe hypoxemia and coma before TI, respectively. The AUROC curve for the MACOCHA score was 0.659 (confidence interval, 0.574-0.743), suggesting a moderate discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed moderate calibration (χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.142, with <i>p</i> = 0.208). One hundred and seventy-one (26.5%) complications occurred in the entire cohort. Some patients had multiple complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MACOCHA score showed moderate discrimination and calibration in predicting DI in our study.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kulkarni AP, Bhosale SJ, Kalvit KR, Cherian S, Shrivastava AM, Gorade MR. Evaluation of MACOCHA Score for predicting Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):208-214.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"208-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915403/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
气管插管(TI)经常需要在重症监护病房(ICU),但可能有灾难性的后果。MACOCHA评分用于预测危重患者插管困难(DI)。材料和方法:经机构伦理委员会批准,我们进行了这项前瞻性、单中心观察性研究。评价MACOCHA评分预测ICU插管困难的能力。我们纳入了500名在ICU接受TI治疗的成年人。我们收集了人口统计数据、ICU入院细节和插管相关数据,用于计算MACOCHA评分。我们使用了Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 21)进行分析。MACOCHA评分预测DI的准确度由受试者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积确定。采用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度统计来确定校准。结果:由于449/500例患者有完整的数据集,我们对他们的数据进行了分析。急性肾衰竭和休克是最常见的原因。氯胺酮和罗库溴铵是治疗TI最常用的药物。DI发生率为13.5%(60/449)。Mallampati评分为III和IV的患者有30例,TI前严重低氧血症和昏迷患者分别为84例和45例。MACOCHA评分的AUROC曲线为0.659(置信区间为0.574-0.743),表明存在中度判别。Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验为中度校正(χ2 = 3.142, p = 0.208)。在整个队列中发生了171例(26.5%)并发症。一些患者有多种并发症。结论:在本研究中,MACOCHA评分在预测DI方面具有中等的判别性和校准性。引用本文:Kulkarni AP, Bhosale SJ, Kalvit KR, Cherian S, Shrivastava AM, Gorade MR. MACOCHA评分对危重癌症患者插管困难的预测价值:一项前瞻性观察研究。中华检验医学杂志;2015;29(3):208-214。
Evaluation of MACOCHA Score for Predicting Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.
Introduction: Tracheal intubation (TI) is often needed in the intensive care unit (ICU) but can have disastrous consequences. The MACOCHA score was developed for prediction of difficult intubation (DI) in critically ill.
Material and methods: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, we conducted this prospective, single-center observational study. Evaluated the ability of MACOCHA score to predict difficult intubation in our ICU. We included 500 adults undergoing TI in our ICU. We collected the demographic data, details of ICU admission, and intubation-related data for calculating MACOCHA score. We used Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 21) for analysis. The accuracy of MACOCHA score for predicting DI was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics was used to determine calibration.
Results: Since complete dataset was available for 449/500 patients, we analyzed their data. Acute renal failure and shock were the most frequent reasons for TI. Ketamine and rocuronium were most commonly used drugs for TI. The incidence of DI was 13.5% (60/449). There were 30 patients whose Mallampati score was either III and IV, while 84 and 45 patients had severe hypoxemia and coma before TI, respectively. The AUROC curve for the MACOCHA score was 0.659 (confidence interval, 0.574-0.743), suggesting a moderate discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed moderate calibration (χ2 = 3.142, with p = 0.208). One hundred and seventy-one (26.5%) complications occurred in the entire cohort. Some patients had multiple complications.
Conclusion: The MACOCHA score showed moderate discrimination and calibration in predicting DI in our study.
How to cite this article: Kulkarni AP, Bhosale SJ, Kalvit KR, Cherian S, Shrivastava AM, Gorade MR. Evaluation of MACOCHA Score for predicting Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):208-214.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.