MACOCHA评分预测急诊科气管插管首次通过成功率的有效性:一项观察性研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Krishna Shukla, Bharat B Bhardwaj, Ankita Kabi, Santosh Galagali, Harsimran Manchanda, Shrirang Joshi, Alok Raj
{"title":"MACOCHA评分预测急诊科气管插管首次通过成功率的有效性:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Krishna Shukla, Bharat B Bhardwaj, Ankita Kabi, Santosh Galagali, Harsimran Manchanda, Shrirang Joshi, Alok Raj","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>In the emergency department (ED), endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a critical, life-saving procedure. The MACOCHA score predicts difficult intubations in intensive care units (ICUs), but it has not been validated in the ED setting. This study aimed to validate the MACOCHA score for predicting first-pass success of ETI performed in the ED.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care institute, over a period of 18 months (September 2020 to February 2022). The study included 74 adult patients who underwent emergency ETI performed by emergency medicine residents. Number of ETI attempts, first-pass success rate, and complications were noted. The MACOCHA score was calculated, and its predictive performance was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first-pass success rate was 54.1%, and 54.1% of patients experienced complications, with hypoxia (18.9%) and hypotension (17.6%) being the most common. Four ETI attempts (<i>p</i> = 0.009) as well as presence of arrhythmia (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and cardiac arrest followed by death (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher MACOCHA score, while MACOCHA score was not significantly associated with first-pass success, aspiration, hypotension, hypoxia, and local injury (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The number of ETI attempts and the number of complications were significantly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.258, <i>p</i> = 0.026). At a cut-off score of 2.50, the MACOCHA score had a sensitivity and specificity of 50.0% and 35.3%, respectively, for the prediction of first-pass success rate [area under the curve: 0.593; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.463-0.723].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MACOCHA score demonstrated limited performance in predicting the first-pass success rate of ETI in the ED.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Shukla K, Bhardwaj BB, Kabi A, Galagali S, Manchanda H, Joshi S, <i>et al</i>. Validity of MACOCHA Score in Predicting First-pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Emergency Department: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):215-222.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"29 3","pages":"215-222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of MACOCHA Score in Predicting First-pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Emergency Department: An Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Krishna Shukla, Bharat B Bhardwaj, Ankita Kabi, Santosh Galagali, Harsimran Manchanda, Shrirang Joshi, Alok Raj\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>In the emergency department (ED), endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a critical, life-saving procedure. The MACOCHA score predicts difficult intubations in intensive care units (ICUs), but it has not been validated in the ED setting. This study aimed to validate the MACOCHA score for predicting first-pass success of ETI performed in the ED.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care institute, over a period of 18 months (September 2020 to February 2022). The study included 74 adult patients who underwent emergency ETI performed by emergency medicine residents. Number of ETI attempts, first-pass success rate, and complications were noted. The MACOCHA score was calculated, and its predictive performance was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first-pass success rate was 54.1%, and 54.1% of patients experienced complications, with hypoxia (18.9%) and hypotension (17.6%) being the most common. Four ETI attempts (<i>p</i> = 0.009) as well as presence of arrhythmia (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and cardiac arrest followed by death (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher MACOCHA score, while MACOCHA score was not significantly associated with first-pass success, aspiration, hypotension, hypoxia, and local injury (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The number of ETI attempts and the number of complications were significantly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.258, <i>p</i> = 0.026). At a cut-off score of 2.50, the MACOCHA score had a sensitivity and specificity of 50.0% and 35.3%, respectively, for the prediction of first-pass success rate [area under the curve: 0.593; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.463-0.723].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MACOCHA score demonstrated limited performance in predicting the first-pass success rate of ETI in the ED.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Shukla K, Bhardwaj BB, Kabi A, Galagali S, Manchanda H, Joshi S, <i>et al</i>. Validity of MACOCHA Score in Predicting First-pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Emergency Department: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):215-222.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"215-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915389/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和背景:在急诊科(ED),气管插管(ETI)是一个关键的,挽救生命的程序。MACOCHA评分预测重症监护病房(icu)插管困难,但尚未在急诊科进行验证。本研究旨在验证MACOCHA评分预测ED中ETI首次通过成功的效果。材料和方法:本前瞻性观察性研究在一家三级医疗机构的ED中进行,为期18个月(2020年9月至2022年2月)。该研究包括74名接受急诊医师急诊ETI的成年患者。记录ETI尝试次数、首次通过成功率和并发症。计算MACOCHA评分,并评价其预测性能。结果:一次通过率为54.1%,54.1%的患者出现并发症,其中以缺氧(18.9%)和低血压(17.6%)最为常见。四次ETI尝试(p = 0.009)以及心律失常(p = 0.004)和心脏骤停(p = 0.001)的存在与较高的MACOCHA评分显著相关,而MACOCHA评分与首次通过成功、误吸、低血压、缺氧和局部损伤无显著相关性(p = 0.05)。ETI尝试次数与并发症次数有显著相关(r = 0.258, p = 0.026)。截止分数为2.50时,MACOCHA评分预测一次通过成功率的敏感性和特异性分别为50.0%和35.3%[曲线下面积:0.593;95%置信区间(CI): 0.463-0.723]。结论:MACOCHA评分在预测ed中ETI的一次通过成功率方面表现有限。本文作者:Shukla K, Bhardwaj BB, Kabi A, Galagali S, Manchanda H, Joshi S,等。MACOCHA评分预测急诊科气管插管首次通过成功率的有效性:一项观察性研究。中华检验医学杂志;2015;29(3):215-222。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of MACOCHA Score in Predicting First-pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Emergency Department: An Observational Study.

Aim and background: In the emergency department (ED), endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a critical, life-saving procedure. The MACOCHA score predicts difficult intubations in intensive care units (ICUs), but it has not been validated in the ED setting. This study aimed to validate the MACOCHA score for predicting first-pass success of ETI performed in the ED.

Materials and methods: This prospective observational study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care institute, over a period of 18 months (September 2020 to February 2022). The study included 74 adult patients who underwent emergency ETI performed by emergency medicine residents. Number of ETI attempts, first-pass success rate, and complications were noted. The MACOCHA score was calculated, and its predictive performance was evaluated.

Results: The first-pass success rate was 54.1%, and 54.1% of patients experienced complications, with hypoxia (18.9%) and hypotension (17.6%) being the most common. Four ETI attempts (p = 0.009) as well as presence of arrhythmia (p = 0.004) and cardiac arrest followed by death (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher MACOCHA score, while MACOCHA score was not significantly associated with first-pass success, aspiration, hypotension, hypoxia, and local injury (p > 0.05). The number of ETI attempts and the number of complications were significantly correlated (r = 0.258, p = 0.026). At a cut-off score of 2.50, the MACOCHA score had a sensitivity and specificity of 50.0% and 35.3%, respectively, for the prediction of first-pass success rate [area under the curve: 0.593; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.463-0.723].

Conclusion: MACOCHA score demonstrated limited performance in predicting the first-pass success rate of ETI in the ED.

How to cite this article: Shukla K, Bhardwaj BB, Kabi A, Galagali S, Manchanda H, Joshi S, et al. Validity of MACOCHA Score in Predicting First-pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Emergency Department: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):215-222.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信