围手术期液体治疗对活体肝移植患者术后肾功能的影响:一项回顾性观察研究

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nurcan Kızılcık
{"title":"围手术期液体治疗对活体肝移植患者术后肾功能的影响:一项回顾性观察研究","authors":"Nurcan Kızılcık","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative fluid management (PFM) is critical in liver transplantation, especially regarding its impact on postoperative renal function. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in liver transplant recipients, often influenced by the type and volume of fluids administered during the perioperative period. This study investigates the effects of different fluid management strategies on renal outcomes following liver transplantation from living donors.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 91 liver transplant recipients who were categorized into three groups based on their PFM strategy: restrictive (<i>n</i> = 1), moderate (<i>n</i> = 34), and liberal (<i>n</i> = 56). Data were collected from patient medical records, focusing on fluid types, peak serum creatinine levels, urine output, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and logistic regression, were conducted to assess renal outcomes among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The moderate fluid management group demonstrated the best renal outcomes, with the lowest peak serum creatinine (1.02 ± 0.25 mg/dL) and shorter ICU stays (2.47 ± 0.62 days) compared to the liberal fluid strategy group (1.40 ± 0.92 mg/dL and 2.88 ± 0.83 days, respectively). Moreover, liberal fluid strategies were associated with fluid overload and increased peak serum creatinine levels. Intraoperative fluid administration showed a greater protective effect on renal function compared to postoperative fluid administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moderate PFM, particularly with careful intraoperative fluid administration, is optimal for minimizing the risk of AKI and improving renal outcomes in liver transplant patients. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized fluid therapy in reducing renal complications after liver transplantation.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kızılcık N. The Effect of Perioperative Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Renal Functions in Patients Receiving Liver Transplantation from Living Donors: A Retrospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):251-261.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"29 3","pages":"251-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Perioperative Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Renal Functions in Patients Receiving Liver Transplantation from Living Donors: A Retrospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nurcan Kızılcık\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative fluid management (PFM) is critical in liver transplantation, especially regarding its impact on postoperative renal function. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in liver transplant recipients, often influenced by the type and volume of fluids administered during the perioperative period. This study investigates the effects of different fluid management strategies on renal outcomes following liver transplantation from living donors.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 91 liver transplant recipients who were categorized into three groups based on their PFM strategy: restrictive (<i>n</i> = 1), moderate (<i>n</i> = 34), and liberal (<i>n</i> = 56). Data were collected from patient medical records, focusing on fluid types, peak serum creatinine levels, urine output, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and logistic regression, were conducted to assess renal outcomes among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The moderate fluid management group demonstrated the best renal outcomes, with the lowest peak serum creatinine (1.02 ± 0.25 mg/dL) and shorter ICU stays (2.47 ± 0.62 days) compared to the liberal fluid strategy group (1.40 ± 0.92 mg/dL and 2.88 ± 0.83 days, respectively). Moreover, liberal fluid strategies were associated with fluid overload and increased peak serum creatinine levels. Intraoperative fluid administration showed a greater protective effect on renal function compared to postoperative fluid administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moderate PFM, particularly with careful intraoperative fluid administration, is optimal for minimizing the risk of AKI and improving renal outcomes in liver transplant patients. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized fluid therapy in reducing renal complications after liver transplantation.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kızılcık N. The Effect of Perioperative Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Renal Functions in Patients Receiving Liver Transplantation from Living Donors: A Retrospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):251-261.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"251-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围手术期液体管理(PFM)在肝移植中是至关重要的,特别是考虑到它对术后肾功能的影响。急性肾损伤(AKI)是肝移植受者常见的并发症,通常受围手术期输液类型和容量的影响。本研究探讨了不同的液体管理策略对活体供体肝移植后肾脏预后的影响。患者和方法:这项回顾性观察性研究包括91名肝移植受者,根据他们的PFM策略分为三组:限制性(n = 1)、中度(n = 34)和自由(n = 56)。从患者医疗记录中收集数据,重点关注液体类型、血清峰值肌酐水平、尿量和住院时间。统计分析,包括方差分析和logistic回归,评估各组之间的肾脏预后。结果:与自由输液组(分别为1.40±0.92 mg/dL和2.88±0.83 d)相比,适度输液组的肾脏预后最好,血清肌酐峰值最低(1.02±0.25 mg/dL), ICU住院时间较短(2.47±0.62 d)。此外,自由液体策略与液体过载和血清肌酐峰值水平升高有关。术中给液比术后给液对肾功能的保护作用更大。结论:在肝移植患者中,适度的PFM,特别是术中给予谨慎的液体,对于最小化AKI的风险和改善肾脏预后是最佳的。这些发现强调了个体化液体治疗在减少肝移植后肾脏并发症中的重要性。N.围手术期液体治疗对活体肝移植患者术后肾功能的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。中华检验医学杂志;2009;29(3):251-261。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Perioperative Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Renal Functions in Patients Receiving Liver Transplantation from Living Donors: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background: Perioperative fluid management (PFM) is critical in liver transplantation, especially regarding its impact on postoperative renal function. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in liver transplant recipients, often influenced by the type and volume of fluids administered during the perioperative period. This study investigates the effects of different fluid management strategies on renal outcomes following liver transplantation from living donors.

Patients and methods: This retrospective observational study included 91 liver transplant recipients who were categorized into three groups based on their PFM strategy: restrictive (n = 1), moderate (n = 34), and liberal (n = 56). Data were collected from patient medical records, focusing on fluid types, peak serum creatinine levels, urine output, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and logistic regression, were conducted to assess renal outcomes among the groups.

Results: The moderate fluid management group demonstrated the best renal outcomes, with the lowest peak serum creatinine (1.02 ± 0.25 mg/dL) and shorter ICU stays (2.47 ± 0.62 days) compared to the liberal fluid strategy group (1.40 ± 0.92 mg/dL and 2.88 ± 0.83 days, respectively). Moreover, liberal fluid strategies were associated with fluid overload and increased peak serum creatinine levels. Intraoperative fluid administration showed a greater protective effect on renal function compared to postoperative fluid administration.

Conclusions: Moderate PFM, particularly with careful intraoperative fluid administration, is optimal for minimizing the risk of AKI and improving renal outcomes in liver transplant patients. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized fluid therapy in reducing renal complications after liver transplantation.

How to cite this article: Kızılcık N. The Effect of Perioperative Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Renal Functions in Patients Receiving Liver Transplantation from Living Donors: A Retrospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):251-261.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信