放大镜、亚甲基蓝染料和荧光素钠染料对一磨牙根管孔定位的检出率和容易程度的比较:一项体内研究。

Q3 Dentistry
Vaibhavi Pharne, Sudha B Patil, Aruna P Vishwakarma, Prashant A Bondarde, Madhuri Bhandare, Rishabh Patel
{"title":"放大镜、亚甲基蓝染料和荧光素钠染料对一磨牙根管孔定位的检出率和容易程度的比较:一项体内研究。","authors":"Vaibhavi Pharne, Sudha B Patil, Aruna P Vishwakarma, Prashant A Bondarde, Madhuri Bhandare, Rishabh Patel","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Primary teeth often show bizarre root canal anatomy; this requires the clinician to gain a thorough knowledge of the primary root canal morphology. Complex primary root canal morphology often leads to missed canals, and hence, various strategies can be adapted to reduce this likelihood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the detection rate and ease of locating root canal orifices in primary molars using magnifying loupes, methylene blue dye, and fluorescein sodium dye.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Parallel-arm randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 36 primary molars were divided into two groups: Group I: methylene blue; Group II: fluorescein sodium. Both groups utilized magnifying loupes (×2.5). The principal investigator used magnifying loupes, followed by the coinvestigator who used the assigned dye to detect the canal orifices. The principal investigator again examined the dyed canal orifices under magnification. The number of canals found and the ease of locating them with the three different aids were recorded on a five-point Likert scoring scale by both investigators.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>A comparison of the number of canal orifices and ease of location was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in ease of detection between loupes, methylene blue dye, and the loupes combination (<i>p</i>-value 0.047); also, between loupes, fluorescein sodium dye, and the loupes combination (<i>p</i>-value 0.040). However, no statistically significant difference was found in detection rate with the three different methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dye and loupes combination was proven more effective than using dye or loupes alone.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Pharne V, Patil SB, Vishwakarma AP, <i>et al</i>. Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(1):64-69.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 1","pages":"64-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vaibhavi Pharne, Sudha B Patil, Aruna P Vishwakarma, Prashant A Bondarde, Madhuri Bhandare, Rishabh Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Primary teeth often show bizarre root canal anatomy; this requires the clinician to gain a thorough knowledge of the primary root canal morphology. Complex primary root canal morphology often leads to missed canals, and hence, various strategies can be adapted to reduce this likelihood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the detection rate and ease of locating root canal orifices in primary molars using magnifying loupes, methylene blue dye, and fluorescein sodium dye.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Parallel-arm randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 36 primary molars were divided into two groups: Group I: methylene blue; Group II: fluorescein sodium. Both groups utilized magnifying loupes (×2.5). The principal investigator used magnifying loupes, followed by the coinvestigator who used the assigned dye to detect the canal orifices. The principal investigator again examined the dyed canal orifices under magnification. The number of canals found and the ease of locating them with the three different aids were recorded on a five-point Likert scoring scale by both investigators.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>A comparison of the number of canal orifices and ease of location was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in ease of detection between loupes, methylene blue dye, and the loupes combination (<i>p</i>-value 0.047); also, between loupes, fluorescein sodium dye, and the loupes combination (<i>p</i>-value 0.040). However, no statistically significant difference was found in detection rate with the three different methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dye and loupes combination was proven more effective than using dye or loupes alone.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Pharne V, Patil SB, Vishwakarma AP, <i>et al</i>. Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(1):64-69.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"64-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳牙常表现出奇怪的根管解剖;这就要求临床医生对根管形态有全面的了解。复杂的根管形态经常导致根管遗漏,因此,可以采用各种策略来减少这种可能性。目的:比较放大镜、亚甲基蓝染料和荧光素钠染料对初生磨牙根管孔的检出率和定位难易程度。设置和设计:平行组随机临床试验。材料与方法:将36颗初生磨牙分为两组:第一组:亚甲基蓝;第二组:荧光素钠。两组均使用放大镜(×2.5)。首席研究员使用放大镜,随后由副研究员使用指定的染料检测管口。首席研究员再次在放大镜下检查染色的管口。发现的运河数量和用三种不同的辅助工具定位它们的难易程度由两位调查人员以李克特五点计分表记录。统计分析:采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较根管口数量和定位难易程度。结果:镜架、亚甲蓝染料及镜架组合的易检性差异有统计学意义(p值为0.047);此外,在镜片之间,荧光素钠染料,和镜片组合(p值0.040)。三种方法的检出率差异无统计学意义。结论:染色剂与镜片联合使用比单独使用染色剂或镜片效果更好。本文引用方式:phine V, Patil SB, Vishwakarma AP等。放大镜、亚甲基蓝染料和荧光素钠染料对一磨牙根管孔定位的检出率和容易程度的比较:一项体内研究。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(1):64-69。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An In Vivo Study.

Context: Primary teeth often show bizarre root canal anatomy; this requires the clinician to gain a thorough knowledge of the primary root canal morphology. Complex primary root canal morphology often leads to missed canals, and hence, various strategies can be adapted to reduce this likelihood.

Aim: To compare the detection rate and ease of locating root canal orifices in primary molars using magnifying loupes, methylene blue dye, and fluorescein sodium dye.

Settings and design: Parallel-arm randomized clinical trial.

Materials and methods: A total of 36 primary molars were divided into two groups: Group I: methylene blue; Group II: fluorescein sodium. Both groups utilized magnifying loupes (×2.5). The principal investigator used magnifying loupes, followed by the coinvestigator who used the assigned dye to detect the canal orifices. The principal investigator again examined the dyed canal orifices under magnification. The number of canals found and the ease of locating them with the three different aids were recorded on a five-point Likert scoring scale by both investigators.

Statistical analysis: A comparison of the number of canal orifices and ease of location was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: There was a significant difference in ease of detection between loupes, methylene blue dye, and the loupes combination (p-value 0.047); also, between loupes, fluorescein sodium dye, and the loupes combination (p-value 0.040). However, no statistically significant difference was found in detection rate with the three different methods.

Conclusion: The dye and loupes combination was proven more effective than using dye or loupes alone.

How to cite this article: Pharne V, Patil SB, Vishwakarma AP, et al. Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(1):64-69.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信