[使用可解释机器学习模型预测心力衰竭合并急性肾损伤患者重症监护病房死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究]。

Q3 Medicine
Xinyao Luo, Dingyuan Wan, Ke Wang, Yupei Li, Ruoxi Liao, Baihai Su
{"title":"[使用可解释机器学习模型预测心力衰竭合并急性肾损伤患者重症监护病房死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究]。","authors":"Xinyao Luo, Dingyuan Wan, Ke Wang, Yupei Li, Ruoxi Liao, Baihai Su","doi":"10.12182/20250160507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Heart failure (HF) complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI) significantly impacts patient outcomes, and it is crucial to make early predictions of short-term mortality. This study is focused on developing an interpretable machine learning model to enhance early prediction accuracy in such clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Ⅳ (MIMIC-Ⅳ, version 2.0) database. Data from the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU were extracted and divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). We utilized the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method to interpret the workings of an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model and identify key prognostic factors. The XGBoost model's predictive ability was evaluated against three other machine learning models using the area under the curve (AUC) metric, and its interpretation was enhanced using the SHAP method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 8028 patients with HF complicated by AKI. The XGBoost model outperformed the other models, achieving an AUC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.94; accuracy = 0.89), while neural network model showed the worst performance (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.77-0.82; accuracy = 0.82). Decision curve analysis showed the superior net benefit of the XGBoost model within the 9% to 60% threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis was performed to identify the top 20 predictors, with age (mean SHAP value 1.29) and Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean SHAP value 1.24) emerging as significant factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our interpretable model offers an enhanced ability to predict mortality risk in HF patients with AKI in ICUs. This model can be used to assist in formulating effective treatment plans and optimizing resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39321,"journal":{"name":"四川大学学报(医学版)","volume":"56 1","pages":"183-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Predicting Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Combined With Acute Kidney Injury Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study].\",\"authors\":\"Xinyao Luo, Dingyuan Wan, Ke Wang, Yupei Li, Ruoxi Liao, Baihai Su\",\"doi\":\"10.12182/20250160507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Heart failure (HF) complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI) significantly impacts patient outcomes, and it is crucial to make early predictions of short-term mortality. This study is focused on developing an interpretable machine learning model to enhance early prediction accuracy in such clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Ⅳ (MIMIC-Ⅳ, version 2.0) database. Data from the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU were extracted and divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). We utilized the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method to interpret the workings of an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model and identify key prognostic factors. The XGBoost model's predictive ability was evaluated against three other machine learning models using the area under the curve (AUC) metric, and its interpretation was enhanced using the SHAP method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 8028 patients with HF complicated by AKI. The XGBoost model outperformed the other models, achieving an AUC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.94; accuracy = 0.89), while neural network model showed the worst performance (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.77-0.82; accuracy = 0.82). Decision curve analysis showed the superior net benefit of the XGBoost model within the 9% to 60% threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis was performed to identify the top 20 predictors, with age (mean SHAP value 1.29) and Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean SHAP value 1.24) emerging as significant factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our interpretable model offers an enhanced ability to predict mortality risk in HF patients with AKI in ICUs. This model can be used to assist in formulating effective treatment plans and optimizing resource allocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"四川大学学报(医学版)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"183-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914016/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"四川大学学报(医学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12182/20250160507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"四川大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12182/20250160507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心力衰竭(HF)合并急性肾损伤(AKI)显著影响患者预后,早期预测短期死亡率至关重要。本研究的重点是开发一种可解释的机器学习模型,以提高此类临床场景的早期预测准确性。方法:本回顾性队列研究利用重症监护医疗信息集市Ⅳ(MIMIC-Ⅳ,2.0版)数据库的数据。提取入院后24小时的数据,分为训练集(70%)和验证集(30%)。我们利用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法解释了极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型的工作原理,并确定了关键的预后因素。使用曲线下面积(AUC)指标对XGBoost模型的预测能力与其他三种机器学习模型进行了评估,并使用SHAP方法增强了其解释能力。结果:本研究纳入了8028例HF合并AKI患者。XGBoost模型优于其他模型,AUC为0.93(95%置信区间[CI]: 0.78-0.94;准确率= 0.89),神经网络模型表现最差(AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.77 ~ 0.82;准确度= 0.82)。决策曲线分析显示,在9%到60%的阈值概率范围内,XGBoost模型的净收益更高。进行SHAP分析以确定前20个预测因素,年龄(平均SHAP值1.29)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(平均SHAP值1.24)成为重要因素。结论:我们的可解释模型可提高预测icu中合并AKI的HF患者死亡风险的能力。该模型可帮助制定有效的治疗方案,优化资源配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Predicting Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Combined With Acute Kidney Injury Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study].

Objective: Heart failure (HF) complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI) significantly impacts patient outcomes, and it is crucial to make early predictions of short-term mortality. This study is focused on developing an interpretable machine learning model to enhance early prediction accuracy in such clinical scenarios.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Ⅳ (MIMIC-Ⅳ, version 2.0) database. Data from the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU were extracted and divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). We utilized the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method to interpret the workings of an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model and identify key prognostic factors. The XGBoost model's predictive ability was evaluated against three other machine learning models using the area under the curve (AUC) metric, and its interpretation was enhanced using the SHAP method.

Results: The study included 8028 patients with HF complicated by AKI. The XGBoost model outperformed the other models, achieving an AUC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.94; accuracy = 0.89), while neural network model showed the worst performance (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.77-0.82; accuracy = 0.82). Decision curve analysis showed the superior net benefit of the XGBoost model within the 9% to 60% threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis was performed to identify the top 20 predictors, with age (mean SHAP value 1.29) and Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean SHAP value 1.24) emerging as significant factors.

Conclusions: Our interpretable model offers an enhanced ability to predict mortality risk in HF patients with AKI in ICUs. This model can be used to assist in formulating effective treatment plans and optimizing resource allocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
四川大学学报(医学版)
四川大学学报(医学版) Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8695
期刊介绍: "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a comprehensive medical academic journal sponsored by Sichuan University, a higher education institution directly under the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. It was founded in 1959 and was originally named "Journal of Sichuan Medical College". In 1986, it was renamed "Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences". In 2003, it was renamed "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" (bimonthly). "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a Chinese core journal and a Chinese authoritative academic journal (RCCSE). It is included in the retrieval systems such as China Science and Technology Papers and Citation Database (CSTPCD), China Science Citation Database (CSCD) (core version), Peking University Library's "Overview of Chinese Core Journals", the U.S. "Index Medica" (IM/Medline), the U.S. "PubMed Central" (PMC), the U.S. "Biological Abstracts" (BA), the U.S. "Chemical Abstracts" (CA), the U.S. EBSCO, the Netherlands "Abstracts and Citation Database" (Scopus), the Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (JST), the Russian "Abstract Magazine", the Chinese Biomedical Literature CD-ROM Database (CBMdisc), the Chinese Biomedical Periodical Literature Database (CMCC), the China Academic Journal Network Full-text Database (CNKI), the Chinese Academic Journal (CD-ROM Edition), and the Wanfang Data-Digital Journal Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信