软端输尿管鞘与非软端输尿管鞘治疗肾下盏结石的比较。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Zhiyong Xiong, Chen Li, Keming Huang, Zhen Han, Shuai Wu
{"title":"软端输尿管鞘与非软端输尿管鞘治疗肾下盏结石的比较。","authors":"Zhiyong Xiong, Chen Li, Keming Huang, Zhen Han, Shuai Wu","doi":"10.1159/000545070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To compare the efficacy of a flexible-tip ureteral access sheath (F-UAS) with a traditional non-flexible ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) in the treatment of renal lower calyx stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included clinical data from patients with unilateral renal lower calyx stones who underwent treatment with either a f-UAS (cases from December 2023 to September 2024) or a T-UAS (cases from January 2023 to November 2023). Inclusion criteria were ages 18-75 years, lower pole kidney stones measuring 1-2 cm. The primary outcome was the immediate postoperative stone-free rate (SFR) on the first day post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and three-month SFR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 132 patients were included in the study, with 63 in the F-UAS group and 69 in the T-UAS group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The F-UAS group demonstrated a significantly higher day-1 postoperative SFR (73.0% vs. 17.4%; P < 0.001). The overall complication rate was lower in the F-UAS group (P = 0.031), with a notably reduced incidence of postoperative fever. The F-UAS group also had a significantly lower basket usage rate (20.6% vs. 100%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in operative time or three-month SFR between the groups (P = 0.097 and P = 0.354, respectively). Hospital stay and stone composition were also similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to T-UAS, the use of F-UAS for retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal lower calyx stones is associated with a higher day-1 SFR. Additionally, the F-UAS group demonstrated reduced basket usage and fewer postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Flexible-Tip and Non-Flexible Ureteral Access Sheaths for Treatment of Renal Lower Calyx Stones.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiyong Xiong, Chen Li, Keming Huang, Zhen Han, Shuai Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To compare the efficacy of a flexible-tip ureteral access sheath (F-UAS) with a traditional non-flexible ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) in the treatment of renal lower calyx stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included clinical data from patients with unilateral renal lower calyx stones who underwent treatment with either a f-UAS (cases from December 2023 to September 2024) or a T-UAS (cases from January 2023 to November 2023). Inclusion criteria were ages 18-75 years, lower pole kidney stones measuring 1-2 cm. The primary outcome was the immediate postoperative stone-free rate (SFR) on the first day post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and three-month SFR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 132 patients were included in the study, with 63 in the F-UAS group and 69 in the T-UAS group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The F-UAS group demonstrated a significantly higher day-1 postoperative SFR (73.0% vs. 17.4%; P < 0.001). The overall complication rate was lower in the F-UAS group (P = 0.031), with a notably reduced incidence of postoperative fever. The F-UAS group also had a significantly lower basket usage rate (20.6% vs. 100%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in operative time or three-month SFR between the groups (P = 0.097 and P = 0.354, respectively). Hospital stay and stone composition were also similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to T-UAS, the use of F-UAS for retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal lower calyx stones is associated with a higher day-1 SFR. Additionally, the F-UAS group demonstrated reduced basket usage and fewer postoperative complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:比较软端输尿管鞘(F-UAS)与传统非软端输尿管鞘(T-UAS)治疗肾下盏结石的疗效。方法:回顾性分析单侧肾下盏结石患者的临床资料,这些患者接受了f-UAS(2023年12月至2024年9月)或T-UAS(2023年1月至2023年11月)的治疗。纳入标准为年龄18-75岁,下极肾结石1-2 cm。主要终点是术后第一天的即刻无结石率(SFR)。次要结局包括手术时间、术后并发症、术后住院时间和3个月SFR。结果:共纳入132例患者,其中F-UAS组63例,T-UAS组69例。各组间基线特征具有可比性。F-UAS组术后第1天的SFR显著高于对照组(73.0% vs. 17.4%;P < 0.001)。F-UAS组总并发症发生率较低(P = 0.031),术后发热发生率明显降低。F-UAS组的购物篮使用率也明显较低(20.6% vs 100%;P < 0.001)。两组手术时间及3个月SFR差异无统计学意义(P = 0.097、P = 0.354)。住院时间和结石组成在两组之间也相似。结论:与T-UAS相比,使用F-UAS进行肾内逆行手术治疗肾下盏结石的第1天SFR较高。此外,F-UAS组显示筐使用减少,术后并发症减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Flexible-Tip and Non-Flexible Ureteral Access Sheaths for Treatment of Renal Lower Calyx Stones.

Introduction: To compare the efficacy of a flexible-tip ureteral access sheath (F-UAS) with a traditional non-flexible ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) in the treatment of renal lower calyx stones.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included clinical data from patients with unilateral renal lower calyx stones who underwent treatment with either a f-UAS (cases from December 2023 to September 2024) or a T-UAS (cases from January 2023 to November 2023). Inclusion criteria were ages 18-75 years, lower pole kidney stones measuring 1-2 cm. The primary outcome was the immediate postoperative stone-free rate (SFR) on the first day post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and three-month SFR.

Results: A total of 132 patients were included in the study, with 63 in the F-UAS group and 69 in the T-UAS group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The F-UAS group demonstrated a significantly higher day-1 postoperative SFR (73.0% vs. 17.4%; P < 0.001). The overall complication rate was lower in the F-UAS group (P = 0.031), with a notably reduced incidence of postoperative fever. The F-UAS group also had a significantly lower basket usage rate (20.6% vs. 100%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in operative time or three-month SFR between the groups (P = 0.097 and P = 0.354, respectively). Hospital stay and stone composition were also similar between groups.

Conclusion: Compared to T-UAS, the use of F-UAS for retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal lower calyx stones is associated with a higher day-1 SFR. Additionally, the F-UAS group demonstrated reduced basket usage and fewer postoperative complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信