机器学习模型的选择对预测手术患者术后感染很重要。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Addison Heffernan, Reetam Ganguli, Isaac Sears, Andrew H Stephen, Daithi S Heffernan
{"title":"机器学习模型的选择对预测手术患者术后感染很重要。","authors":"Addison Heffernan, Reetam Ganguli, Isaac Sears, Andrew H Stephen, Daithi S Heffernan","doi":"10.1089/sur.2024.288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Surgical quality datasets are critical to decision-making tools including surgical infection (SI). Machine learning models (MLMs), a branch of artificial intelligence (AI), are increasingly being ingrained within surgical decision-making algorithms. However, given the unique and distinct functioning of individual models, not all models may be suitable for acutely ill surgical patients. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> This is a 5-year retrospective review of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patients who underwent an operation. The data were reviewed for demographics, medical comorbidities, rates, and sites of infection. To generate the MLMs, data were imported into <i>Python</i>, and four common MLMs, extreme gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest, and logistic regression, as well as two novel models (flexible discriminant analysis and generalized additive model) and ensemble modeling, were generated to predict post-operative SIs. Outputs included area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) including recall curves. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 624,625 urgent and emergent NSQIP patients were included. The overall infection rate was 8.6%. Patients who sustained a post-operative infection were older, more likely geriatric, male, diabetic, had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were smokers, and were less likely White race. With respect to MLMs, all four MLMs had reasonable accuracy. However, a hierarchy of MLMs was noted with predictive abilities (XGB AUC = 0.85 and logistic regression = 0.82), wherein KNN has the lowest performance (AUC = 0.62). With respect to the ability to detect an infection, precision recall of XGB performed well (AUC = 0.73), whereas KNN performed poorly (AUC = 0.16). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> MLMs are not created nor function similarly. We identified differences with MLMs to predict post-operative infections in surgical patients. Before MLMs are incorporated into surgical decision making, it is critical that surgeons are at the fore of understanding the role and functioning of MLMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice of Machine Learning Models Is Important to Predict Post-Operative Infections in Surgical Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Addison Heffernan, Reetam Ganguli, Isaac Sears, Andrew H Stephen, Daithi S Heffernan\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/sur.2024.288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Surgical quality datasets are critical to decision-making tools including surgical infection (SI). Machine learning models (MLMs), a branch of artificial intelligence (AI), are increasingly being ingrained within surgical decision-making algorithms. However, given the unique and distinct functioning of individual models, not all models may be suitable for acutely ill surgical patients. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> This is a 5-year retrospective review of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patients who underwent an operation. The data were reviewed for demographics, medical comorbidities, rates, and sites of infection. To generate the MLMs, data were imported into <i>Python</i>, and four common MLMs, extreme gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest, and logistic regression, as well as two novel models (flexible discriminant analysis and generalized additive model) and ensemble modeling, were generated to predict post-operative SIs. Outputs included area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) including recall curves. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 624,625 urgent and emergent NSQIP patients were included. The overall infection rate was 8.6%. Patients who sustained a post-operative infection were older, more likely geriatric, male, diabetic, had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were smokers, and were less likely White race. With respect to MLMs, all four MLMs had reasonable accuracy. However, a hierarchy of MLMs was noted with predictive abilities (XGB AUC = 0.85 and logistic regression = 0.82), wherein KNN has the lowest performance (AUC = 0.62). With respect to the ability to detect an infection, precision recall of XGB performed well (AUC = 0.73), whereas KNN performed poorly (AUC = 0.16). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> MLMs are not created nor function similarly. We identified differences with MLMs to predict post-operative infections in surgical patients. Before MLMs are incorporated into surgical decision making, it is critical that surgeons are at the fore of understanding the role and functioning of MLMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.288\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术质量数据集对包括手术感染(SI)在内的决策工具至关重要。机器学习模型(MLMs)是人工智能(AI)的一个分支,在手术决策算法中越来越根深蒂固。然而,考虑到个体模型的独特和不同的功能,并非所有模型都适合急性外科患者。患者和方法:这是一项针对国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)中接受手术的患者的5年回顾性研究。对这些数据进行了人口统计、医疗合并症、发病率和感染地点的审查。为了生成mlm,将数据导入Python,并生成四种常见的mlm,极端梯度增强,k近邻(KNN),随机森林和逻辑回归,以及两种新模型(灵活判别分析和广义加性模型)和集成建模,以预测术后si。输出包括接收者工作特征曲线(AUC ROC)下的面积,包括召回曲线。结果:共纳入急诊NSQIP患者624,625例。总感染率为8.6%。术后持续感染的患者年龄较大,更可能是老年人、男性、糖尿病患者、慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者、吸烟者,白人的可能性较小。就传销而言,所有四种传销都有合理的准确性。然而,传销的预测能力存在层次结构(XGB AUC = 0.85,逻辑回归= 0.82),其中KNN的表现最低(AUC = 0.62)。在检测感染的能力方面,XGB的精确召回率表现良好(AUC = 0.73),而KNN表现较差(AUC = 0.16)。结论:传销不是创建或功能相似。我们在预测手术患者术后感染方面发现了与MLMs的差异。在将传销纳入手术决策之前,至关重要的是,外科医生必须了解传销的作用和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choice of Machine Learning Models Is Important to Predict Post-Operative Infections in Surgical Patients.

Background: Surgical quality datasets are critical to decision-making tools including surgical infection (SI). Machine learning models (MLMs), a branch of artificial intelligence (AI), are increasingly being ingrained within surgical decision-making algorithms. However, given the unique and distinct functioning of individual models, not all models may be suitable for acutely ill surgical patients. Patients and Methods: This is a 5-year retrospective review of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patients who underwent an operation. The data were reviewed for demographics, medical comorbidities, rates, and sites of infection. To generate the MLMs, data were imported into Python, and four common MLMs, extreme gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest, and logistic regression, as well as two novel models (flexible discriminant analysis and generalized additive model) and ensemble modeling, were generated to predict post-operative SIs. Outputs included area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) including recall curves. Results: Overall, 624,625 urgent and emergent NSQIP patients were included. The overall infection rate was 8.6%. Patients who sustained a post-operative infection were older, more likely geriatric, male, diabetic, had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were smokers, and were less likely White race. With respect to MLMs, all four MLMs had reasonable accuracy. However, a hierarchy of MLMs was noted with predictive abilities (XGB AUC = 0.85 and logistic regression = 0.82), wherein KNN has the lowest performance (AUC = 0.62). With respect to the ability to detect an infection, precision recall of XGB performed well (AUC = 0.73), whereas KNN performed poorly (AUC = 0.16). Conclusions: MLMs are not created nor function similarly. We identified differences with MLMs to predict post-operative infections in surgical patients. Before MLMs are incorporated into surgical decision making, it is critical that surgeons are at the fore of understanding the role and functioning of MLMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信