Thibaut Long Depaquit, Michael Baboudjian, Alessandro Uleri, William Berchiche, Frederic Arroua, Arthur Peyrottes, Christophe Eghazarian, Marc Fourmarier
{"title":"前列腺支架在急慢性尿潴留中的应用。","authors":"Thibaut Long Depaquit, Michael Baboudjian, Alessandro Uleri, William Berchiche, Frederic Arroua, Arthur Peyrottes, Christophe Eghazarian, Marc Fourmarier","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05470-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Exime prostatic stent, a silicone-based device designed for temporary urinary retention management, offers an alternative to indwelling urethral catheters (IUCs), allowing spontaneous voiding. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the Exime device with IUCs in patients with urinary retention due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 43 patients from 2020 to 2024 with failed trial without catheter (TWOC) following acute urinary retention (AUR) secondary to BPO, prostate volume ≤ 120 mL, and intravesical prostatic protrusion < 5 mm. The stent was inserted under local anesthesia as an outpatient procedure.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>effectiveness in restoring urinary flow. Secondary endpoints: complications, patient preferences, and comparisons with IUCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median patient age was 86 years (IQR 78-90); median prostate volume was 45 mL (IQR 40-61). The stent was successfully inserted in 42 patients (98%), with all achieving spontaneous voiding. Median post-void residual volume was 45 mL (IQR 38-73), and 70% retained the stent for ≥ 4 weeks. Complications included obstruction (14%), infection (9%), and migration (7%). Compared to IUCs, the Exime stent reduced symptomatic urinary tract infections (9% vs. 40%, p = 0.03), bladder spasms (16% vs. 84%, p < 0.001), and urinary leakage (0% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). Patients reported lower pain (VAS 2 vs. 8, p < 0.001) and higher satisfaction (VAS 8 vs. 1, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Exime stent effectively managed urinary retention with fewer complications and higher patient satisfaction compared to IUCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exime prostatic stent in acute and chronic urinary retention.\",\"authors\":\"Thibaut Long Depaquit, Michael Baboudjian, Alessandro Uleri, William Berchiche, Frederic Arroua, Arthur Peyrottes, Christophe Eghazarian, Marc Fourmarier\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-025-05470-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Exime prostatic stent, a silicone-based device designed for temporary urinary retention management, offers an alternative to indwelling urethral catheters (IUCs), allowing spontaneous voiding. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the Exime device with IUCs in patients with urinary retention due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 43 patients from 2020 to 2024 with failed trial without catheter (TWOC) following acute urinary retention (AUR) secondary to BPO, prostate volume ≤ 120 mL, and intravesical prostatic protrusion < 5 mm. The stent was inserted under local anesthesia as an outpatient procedure.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>effectiveness in restoring urinary flow. Secondary endpoints: complications, patient preferences, and comparisons with IUCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median patient age was 86 years (IQR 78-90); median prostate volume was 45 mL (IQR 40-61). The stent was successfully inserted in 42 patients (98%), with all achieving spontaneous voiding. Median post-void residual volume was 45 mL (IQR 38-73), and 70% retained the stent for ≥ 4 weeks. Complications included obstruction (14%), infection (9%), and migration (7%). Compared to IUCs, the Exime stent reduced symptomatic urinary tract infections (9% vs. 40%, p = 0.03), bladder spasms (16% vs. 84%, p < 0.001), and urinary leakage (0% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). Patients reported lower pain (VAS 2 vs. 8, p < 0.001) and higher satisfaction (VAS 8 vs. 1, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Exime stent effectively managed urinary retention with fewer complications and higher patient satisfaction compared to IUCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05470-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05470-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:Exime前列腺支架是一种硅基装置,设计用于临时尿潴留管理,提供了一种替代留置导尿管(IUCs)的方法,允许自然排尿。本研究旨在比较Exime装置与IUCs在治疗良性前列腺梗阻(BPO)所致尿潴留患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2020年至2024年期间43例无导管试验(TWOC)失败患者,这些患者均为BPO继发急性尿潴留(AUR)、前列腺体积≤120 mL、膀胱内前列腺突出。次要终点:并发症、患者偏好以及与IUCs的比较。结果:患者中位年龄为86岁(IQR 78-90);前列腺体积中位数为45 mL (IQR 40-61)。42例(98%)患者成功植入该支架,全部实现自然排尿。空隙后中位残留容量为45 mL (IQR 38-73), 70%的支架保留≥4周。并发症包括梗阻(14%)、感染(9%)和移位(7%)。与IUCs相比,Exime支架减少了症状性尿路感染(9%对40%,p = 0.03)和膀胱痉挛(16%对84%,p)。结论:与IUCs相比,Exime支架有效地控制了尿潴留,并发症更少,患者满意度更高。
Exime prostatic stent in acute and chronic urinary retention.
Purpose: The Exime prostatic stent, a silicone-based device designed for temporary urinary retention management, offers an alternative to indwelling urethral catheters (IUCs), allowing spontaneous voiding. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the Exime device with IUCs in patients with urinary retention due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).
Methods: This retrospective study included 43 patients from 2020 to 2024 with failed trial without catheter (TWOC) following acute urinary retention (AUR) secondary to BPO, prostate volume ≤ 120 mL, and intravesical prostatic protrusion < 5 mm. The stent was inserted under local anesthesia as an outpatient procedure.
Primary endpoint: effectiveness in restoring urinary flow. Secondary endpoints: complications, patient preferences, and comparisons with IUCs.
Results: Median patient age was 86 years (IQR 78-90); median prostate volume was 45 mL (IQR 40-61). The stent was successfully inserted in 42 patients (98%), with all achieving spontaneous voiding. Median post-void residual volume was 45 mL (IQR 38-73), and 70% retained the stent for ≥ 4 weeks. Complications included obstruction (14%), infection (9%), and migration (7%). Compared to IUCs, the Exime stent reduced symptomatic urinary tract infections (9% vs. 40%, p = 0.03), bladder spasms (16% vs. 84%, p < 0.001), and urinary leakage (0% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). Patients reported lower pain (VAS 2 vs. 8, p < 0.001) and higher satisfaction (VAS 8 vs. 1, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The Exime stent effectively managed urinary retention with fewer complications and higher patient satisfaction compared to IUCs.
期刊介绍:
The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.