新一代宏基因组测序在糖尿病合并社区获得性肺炎患者病原体诊断中的应用。

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Open Life Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/biol-2022-1048
Hong-Bo Chen, Jie Liu, Yu Zhang, Hao Huang, Li-Na Wang
{"title":"新一代宏基因组测序在糖尿病合并社区获得性肺炎患者病原体诊断中的应用。","authors":"Hong-Bo Chen, Jie Liu, Yu Zhang, Hao Huang, Li-Na Wang","doi":"10.1515/biol-2022-1048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the clinical utility and optimal timing of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The study included 50 hospitalized patients diagnosed with diabetes complicated by CAP who underwent conventional microbiological testing (CMT) and mNGS using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Among the 50 cases, 16% presented no respiratory symptoms. There were significant increases in inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6, with patchy imaging changes being the most prevalent. The positive rates for pathogen detection by mNGS and CMTs were 78 and 21% (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mNGS was significantly better than the CMTs in the detection of rare pathogens such as <i>Anaerobes</i>, <i>Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium bovis, Aspergillus fumigatus</i>, and <i>Pneumocystis japonicus</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). After clinical interpretation, 85% (22/26) of viruses, 24% (9/37) of bacteria, and 25% (2/8) of fungi were non-pathogen organisms by mNGS. There was a significant difference in the rates of adjustment in anti-infection treatment strategies based on the pathogen detection results from CMTs and mNGS, which were 2 and 46%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). We found that mNGS was superior to CMTs in terms of the positive rate of pathogen detection, detecting mixed infection incidence, rare pathogen detection rates, and the adjustment of treatment strategies. However, mNGS results need to be interpreted in the context of the clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":19605,"journal":{"name":"Open Life Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":"20221048"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Bo Chen, Jie Liu, Yu Zhang, Hao Huang, Li-Na Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/biol-2022-1048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To explore the clinical utility and optimal timing of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The study included 50 hospitalized patients diagnosed with diabetes complicated by CAP who underwent conventional microbiological testing (CMT) and mNGS using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Among the 50 cases, 16% presented no respiratory symptoms. There were significant increases in inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6, with patchy imaging changes being the most prevalent. The positive rates for pathogen detection by mNGS and CMTs were 78 and 21% (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mNGS was significantly better than the CMTs in the detection of rare pathogens such as <i>Anaerobes</i>, <i>Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium bovis, Aspergillus fumigatus</i>, and <i>Pneumocystis japonicus</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). After clinical interpretation, 85% (22/26) of viruses, 24% (9/37) of bacteria, and 25% (2/8) of fungi were non-pathogen organisms by mNGS. There was a significant difference in the rates of adjustment in anti-infection treatment strategies based on the pathogen detection results from CMTs and mNGS, which were 2 and 46%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). We found that mNGS was superior to CMTs in terms of the positive rate of pathogen detection, detecting mixed infection incidence, rare pathogen detection rates, and the adjustment of treatment strategies. However, mNGS results need to be interpreted in the context of the clinic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"20221048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920761/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-1048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-1048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨新一代宏基因组测序(mNGS)在糖尿病合并社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者病原体诊断中的临床应用及最佳时机。该研究纳入了50例诊断为糖尿病合并CAP的住院患者,他们接受了常规微生物检测(CMT)和使用支气管肺泡灌洗液的mNGS。50例患者中,16%无呼吸道症状。炎症标志物如c反应蛋白、红细胞沉降率和白细胞介素-6显著增加,以斑片状影像学改变最为普遍。mNGS和cmt病原菌检出率分别为78%和21% (P < 0.05)。mNGS对厌氧菌、裸热衣原体、嗜肺军团菌、牛分枝杆菌、烟曲霉、日本肺囊虫等罕见病原菌的检出率显著优于cmt (P < 0.05)。经临床解释,mNGS检测,85%(22/26)的病毒、24%(9/37)的细菌和25%(2/8)的真菌为非病原生物。基于cmt和mNGS病原菌检测结果的抗感染治疗策略调整率分别为2%和46%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。我们发现mNGS在病原菌检出率、混合感染检出率、罕见病原菌检出率、治疗策略调整等方面均优于cmt。然而,mNGS结果需要在临床背景下进行解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia.

To explore the clinical utility and optimal timing of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The study included 50 hospitalized patients diagnosed with diabetes complicated by CAP who underwent conventional microbiological testing (CMT) and mNGS using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Among the 50 cases, 16% presented no respiratory symptoms. There were significant increases in inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6, with patchy imaging changes being the most prevalent. The positive rates for pathogen detection by mNGS and CMTs were 78 and 21% (P < 0.05). The mNGS was significantly better than the CMTs in the detection of rare pathogens such as Anaerobes, Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium bovis, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Pneumocystis japonicus (P < 0.05). After clinical interpretation, 85% (22/26) of viruses, 24% (9/37) of bacteria, and 25% (2/8) of fungi were non-pathogen organisms by mNGS. There was a significant difference in the rates of adjustment in anti-infection treatment strategies based on the pathogen detection results from CMTs and mNGS, which were 2 and 46%, respectively (P < 0.05). We found that mNGS was superior to CMTs in terms of the positive rate of pathogen detection, detecting mixed infection incidence, rare pathogen detection rates, and the adjustment of treatment strategies. However, mNGS results need to be interpreted in the context of the clinic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
131
审稿时长
43 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Life Sciences (previously Central European Journal of Biology) is a fast growing peer-reviewed journal, devoted to scholarly research in all areas of life sciences, such as molecular biology, plant science, biotechnology, cell biology, biochemistry, biophysics, microbiology and virology, ecology, differentiation and development, genetics and many others. Open Life Sciences assures top quality of published data through critical peer review and editorial involvement throughout the whole publication process. Thanks to the Open Access model of publishing, it also offers unrestricted access to published articles for all users.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信