美国印第安人对各种戒烟辅助和方法的看法:一项社区参与的定性研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dana Mowls Carroll, Julie Ntegeye, Lou Moerner, Claradina Soto, Dorothy Hatsukami, Antony Stately, Dylan Jennings, Wyatt Pickner
{"title":"美国印第安人对各种戒烟辅助和方法的看法:一项社区参与的定性研究。","authors":"Dana Mowls Carroll, Julie Ntegeye, Lou Moerner, Claradina Soto, Dorothy Hatsukami, Antony Stately, Dylan Jennings, Wyatt Pickner","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Increasing smoking cessation among American Indian (AI) persons is a critical equity goal.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>During 2022, AI persons (N = 46) were interviewed on perceptions of existing and novel cessation approaches. Intention to use each approach was assessed and questions started with \"cold turkey\" and then queried about the following: nicotine patches, gum, lozenges (NRT); prescription medications; plant-based medications; personalized medicine; e-cigarettes; and nicotine reduction standard (NRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perspectives informed the identification of six crosscutting themes which were (a) environmental constraints, (b) addictiveness and side effects, (c) effectiveness of approach, (d) interpersonal influence, (e) duration or requirements of approach, and (f) novelty. Plant-based medications were viewed as natural, less likely to cause side effects, and aligned with AI cultures. Regarding NRT, many participants talked about positive word-of-mouth but noted concerns about effectiveness, side effects, and price. Regarding personalized medicine, many indicated curiosity, but some noted it would delay treatment and was too extreme to share a sample. Common perspectives for cold turkey were its drug-free nature and cost savings, but some noted it does not address cravings. Regarding the NRS, many were supportive, although some were concerned with compensatory smoking and what else remains in the cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Themes translated to the greatest proportion of participants stating they would use plant-based medications followed by NRT and personalized medicine. Fewer participants reported intent to use prescription medications and e-cigarettes which reflect greater concerns with these approaches.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Results can inform tribal and other public health programming and communication efforts to increase smoking cessation among AI persons and help drive down disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"1721-1728"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"American Indian Persons' Perspectives on Various Smoking Cessation Aids and Approaches: A Community-Engaged Qualitative Research Study.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Mowls Carroll, Julie Ntegeye, Lou Moerner, Claradina Soto, Dorothy Hatsukami, Antony Stately, Dylan Jennings, Wyatt Pickner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Increasing smoking cessation among American Indian (AI) persons is a critical equity goal.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>During 2022, AI persons (N = 46) were interviewed on perceptions of existing and novel cessation approaches. Intention to use each approach was assessed and questions started with \\\"cold turkey\\\" and then queried about the following: nicotine patches, gum, lozenges (NRT); prescription medications; plant-based medications; personalized medicine; e-cigarettes; and nicotine reduction standard (NRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perspectives informed the identification of six crosscutting themes which were (a) environmental constraints, (b) addictiveness and side effects, (c) effectiveness of approach, (d) interpersonal influence, (e) duration or requirements of approach, and (f) novelty. Plant-based medications were viewed as natural, less likely to cause side effects, and aligned with AI cultures. Regarding NRT, many participants talked about positive word-of-mouth but noted concerns about effectiveness, side effects, and price. Regarding personalized medicine, many indicated curiosity, but some noted it would delay treatment and was too extreme to share a sample. Common perspectives for cold turkey were its drug-free nature and cost savings, but some noted it does not address cravings. Regarding the NRS, many were supportive, although some were concerned with compensatory smoking and what else remains in the cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Themes translated to the greatest proportion of participants stating they would use plant-based medications followed by NRT and personalized medicine. Fewer participants reported intent to use prescription medications and e-cigarettes which reflect greater concerns with these approaches.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Results can inform tribal and other public health programming and communication efforts to increase smoking cessation among AI persons and help drive down disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1721-1728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的美国印第安人(AI)戒烟是一个关键的公平目标。目的和方法:在2022年期间,对AI人员(N = 46)进行了访谈,了解对现有和新型戒烟方法的看法。评估了使用每种方法的意愿,并以“突然停止”开始提问,然后询问以下内容:尼古丁贴片、口香糖、含片(NRT);处方药;植物性药物;个性化医学;电子烟;和尼古丁减少标准(NRS)。结果:观点为确定六个交叉主题提供了信息,这些主题是(a)环境限制,(b)成瘾性和副作用,(c)方法有效性,(d)人际影响,(e)方法的持续时间或要求,以及(f)新颖性。植物性药物被认为是天然的,不太可能产生副作用,并且与人工智能培养相一致。关于NRT,许多与会者谈到了积极的口碑,但也指出了对有效性、副作用和价格的担忧。关于个性化医疗,许多人表示好奇,但也有人指出,这会延误治疗,而且分享样本也太极端了。普遍的观点是它的无毒性质和成本节约,但一些人指出,它并没有解决渴望。关于NRS,许多人表示支持,尽管有些人担心代偿性吸烟以及香烟中残留的其他物质。结论:主题转化为最大比例的参与者表示他们将使用植物性药物,其次是NRT和个性化药物。较少的参与者报告有意使用处方药和电子烟,这反映了对这些方法的更大担忧。影响:研究结果可以为部落和其他公共卫生规划和沟通工作提供信息,以增加人工智能人群的戒烟,并有助于缩小差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
American Indian Persons' Perspectives on Various Smoking Cessation Aids and Approaches: A Community-Engaged Qualitative Research Study.

Introduction: Increasing smoking cessation among American Indian (AI) persons is a critical equity goal.

Aims and methods: During 2022, AI persons (N = 46) were interviewed on perceptions of existing and novel cessation approaches. Intention to use each approach was assessed and questions started with "cold turkey" and then queried about the following: nicotine patches, gum, lozenges (NRT); prescription medications; plant-based medications; personalized medicine; e-cigarettes; and nicotine reduction standard (NRS).

Results: Perspectives informed the identification of six crosscutting themes which were (a) environmental constraints, (b) addictiveness and side effects, (c) effectiveness of approach, (d) interpersonal influence, (e) duration or requirements of approach, and (f) novelty. Plant-based medications were viewed as natural, less likely to cause side effects, and aligned with AI cultures. Regarding NRT, many participants talked about positive word-of-mouth but noted concerns about effectiveness, side effects, and price. Regarding personalized medicine, many indicated curiosity, but some noted it would delay treatment and was too extreme to share a sample. Common perspectives for cold turkey were its drug-free nature and cost savings, but some noted it does not address cravings. Regarding the NRS, many were supportive, although some were concerned with compensatory smoking and what else remains in the cigarettes.

Conclusions: Themes translated to the greatest proportion of participants stating they would use plant-based medications followed by NRT and personalized medicine. Fewer participants reported intent to use prescription medications and e-cigarettes which reflect greater concerns with these approaches.

Implications: Results can inform tribal and other public health programming and communication efforts to increase smoking cessation among AI persons and help drive down disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信