Jia Liang Kwek, Li Chang Ang, Lydia Wei Wei Lim, Su Hooi Teo, Cynthia Ciwei Lim, Xiaohui Xin, Li Choo Ng, Marjorie Wai Yin Foo, Chieh Suai Tan, Jason Chon Jun Choo
{"title":"使用多学科护理方案治疗晚期慢性肾脏疾病成人患者的成本和结果","authors":"Jia Liang Kwek, Li Chang Ang, Lydia Wei Wei Lim, Su Hooi Teo, Cynthia Ciwei Lim, Xiaohui Xin, Li Choo Ng, Marjorie Wai Yin Foo, Chieh Suai Tan, Jason Chon Jun Choo","doi":"10.1159/000542882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the direct healthcare cost and outcomes of a multidisciplinary care (MDC) program versus usual care for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, attending the MDC program or the usual care clinic in a tertiary hospital from 2016 to 2019. The usual care group was matched to the MDC group using propensity score matching based on age, gender, baseline eGFR, and diabetes mellitus. The primary outcome was the rate of emergent long-term kidney replacement therapy (KRT) initiation and the direct healthcare cost incurred from eGFR for less than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the initiation of long-term KRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 280 patients in each group. The MDC group had a lower rate of emergent KRT initiation than the usual care group (33.3 vs. 55.7 events per 100 patient-year, p = 0.003), shorter length of hospitalization stay (8.0 vs. 16.5 days per year, p = 0.004), lower number of emergency department visits (0.7 vs. 1.2 visits per year, p = 0.005), and higher number of renal clinic visits (14.5 vs. 13.0 visits per year, p = 0.009). The healthcare cost was lower in the MDC group than in the usual care group (SGD USD 18,408.83 (USD 13,664.51) vs. SGD USD 28,734.43 (USD 21,329.00) per patient-year, p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MDC program for patients with advanced CKD in Singapore was associated with lower rate of emergent KRT initiation, shorter hospitalization stay, lower number of emergency department visit, and lower healthcare cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":" ","pages":"302-310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cost and Outcomes of Using Multidisciplinary Care Program in the Care of Adult Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Liang Kwek, Li Chang Ang, Lydia Wei Wei Lim, Su Hooi Teo, Cynthia Ciwei Lim, Xiaohui Xin, Li Choo Ng, Marjorie Wai Yin Foo, Chieh Suai Tan, Jason Chon Jun Choo\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the direct healthcare cost and outcomes of a multidisciplinary care (MDC) program versus usual care for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, attending the MDC program or the usual care clinic in a tertiary hospital from 2016 to 2019. The usual care group was matched to the MDC group using propensity score matching based on age, gender, baseline eGFR, and diabetes mellitus. The primary outcome was the rate of emergent long-term kidney replacement therapy (KRT) initiation and the direct healthcare cost incurred from eGFR for less than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the initiation of long-term KRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 280 patients in each group. The MDC group had a lower rate of emergent KRT initiation than the usual care group (33.3 vs. 55.7 events per 100 patient-year, p = 0.003), shorter length of hospitalization stay (8.0 vs. 16.5 days per year, p = 0.004), lower number of emergency department visits (0.7 vs. 1.2 visits per year, p = 0.005), and higher number of renal clinic visits (14.5 vs. 13.0 visits per year, p = 0.009). The healthcare cost was lower in the MDC group than in the usual care group (SGD USD 18,408.83 (USD 13,664.51) vs. SGD USD 28,734.43 (USD 21,329.00) per patient-year, p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MDC program for patients with advanced CKD in Singapore was associated with lower rate of emergent KRT initiation, shorter hospitalization stay, lower number of emergency department visit, and lower healthcare cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephron\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"302-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephron\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542882\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是比较新加坡晚期慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者的多学科护理(MDC)计划与常规护理的直接医疗成本和结果。方法:回顾性研究2016 - 2019年在某三级医院MDC项目或常规门诊就诊的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)小于20 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者。使用基于年龄、性别、基线eGFR和糖尿病的倾向评分匹配,常规护理组与MDC组进行匹配。主要结果是急诊长期肾脏替代治疗(KRT)启动率和eGFR低于20 mL/min/1.73 m2启动长期肾脏替代治疗所产生的直接医疗费用。结果:两组共280例。MDC组的紧急KRT启动率低于常规护理组(33.3 vs. 55.7事件/ 100患者年,p = 0.003),住院时间较短(8.0 vs. 16.5天/年,p = 0.004),急诊科就诊次数较少(0.7 vs. 1.2次/年,p = 0.005),肾脏门诊就诊次数较多(14.5 vs. 13.0次/年,p = 0.009)。MDC组的医疗保健费用低于常规护理组(每位患者年18,408.83新元(13,664.51美元)对28,734.43新元(21,329.00美元),p = 0.016)。结论:新加坡晚期CKD患者的MDC项目与较低的紧急KRT启动率、较短的住院时间、较低的急诊科就诊次数和较低的医疗成本相关。
The Cost and Outcomes of Using Multidisciplinary Care Program in the Care of Adult Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the direct healthcare cost and outcomes of a multidisciplinary care (MDC) program versus usual care for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Singapore.
Methods: A retrospective study of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, attending the MDC program or the usual care clinic in a tertiary hospital from 2016 to 2019. The usual care group was matched to the MDC group using propensity score matching based on age, gender, baseline eGFR, and diabetes mellitus. The primary outcome was the rate of emergent long-term kidney replacement therapy (KRT) initiation and the direct healthcare cost incurred from eGFR for less than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the initiation of long-term KRT.
Results: There were 280 patients in each group. The MDC group had a lower rate of emergent KRT initiation than the usual care group (33.3 vs. 55.7 events per 100 patient-year, p = 0.003), shorter length of hospitalization stay (8.0 vs. 16.5 days per year, p = 0.004), lower number of emergency department visits (0.7 vs. 1.2 visits per year, p = 0.005), and higher number of renal clinic visits (14.5 vs. 13.0 visits per year, p = 0.009). The healthcare cost was lower in the MDC group than in the usual care group (SGD USD 18,408.83 (USD 13,664.51) vs. SGD USD 28,734.43 (USD 21,329.00) per patient-year, p = 0.016).
Conclusion: The MDC program for patients with advanced CKD in Singapore was associated with lower rate of emergent KRT initiation, shorter hospitalization stay, lower number of emergency department visit, and lower healthcare cost.
期刊介绍:
''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.