初级保健中综合用药患者的用药管理:临床实践指南的范围审查。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Loes Engels, Marjan van den Akker, Petra Denig, Henri Stoffers, Heike Gerger, Jolijn Bohnen, Jesse Jansen
{"title":"初级保健中综合用药患者的用药管理:临床实践指南的范围审查。","authors":"Loes Engels,&nbsp;Marjan van den Akker,&nbsp;Petra Denig,&nbsp;Henri Stoffers,&nbsp;Heike Gerger,&nbsp;Jolijn Bohnen,&nbsp;Jesse Jansen","doi":"10.1111/jebm.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Inappropriate polypharmacy increases the risk of medication-related issues. Adequate management of polypharmacy is a challenge involving different healthcare professionals, complex decision-making and ideally including patient involvement. The objective of this scoping review was to provide an overview of national recommendations for medication management of patients with polypharmacy in primary care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines focusing on medication management in adults with polypharmacy, applicable to primary care was performed. Databases (G-I-N, Turning Research into Practice and PubMed), network, and a global report were screened for guidelines published after 2000 in English, Dutch, German, Spanish, French, or Russian. Raw data were extracted in duplicate using an extraction framework focusing on strategies, involvement of professionals, patient involvement, and implementation. Qualitative content analysis was used. Guideline quality was assessed using AGREE-II. The study was registered with the Open Science Framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eight guidelines originating from eight countries were included. The most common recommended strategy was a medication review conducted by a general practitioner and/or a community pharmacist. Tasks and target population differed per guideline. Most guidelines recommended involving the patient in the process, mostly to elicit the patient's experiences and treatment goals. Few guidelines included advice on the implementation of recommendations. Three out of eight guidelines were of good quality (AGREE-II score &gt;70% in 5/6 domains).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Most guidelines recommended a medication review, with patient involvement, as a strategy for medication management in polypharmacy in primary care. Guidance on task division and implementation of guidelines in practice was less clear. This review illustrates room for guideline improvements.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication Management in Patients With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Loes Engels,&nbsp;Marjan van den Akker,&nbsp;Petra Denig,&nbsp;Henri Stoffers,&nbsp;Heike Gerger,&nbsp;Jolijn Bohnen,&nbsp;Jesse Jansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jebm.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Inappropriate polypharmacy increases the risk of medication-related issues. Adequate management of polypharmacy is a challenge involving different healthcare professionals, complex decision-making and ideally including patient involvement. The objective of this scoping review was to provide an overview of national recommendations for medication management of patients with polypharmacy in primary care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines focusing on medication management in adults with polypharmacy, applicable to primary care was performed. Databases (G-I-N, Turning Research into Practice and PubMed), network, and a global report were screened for guidelines published after 2000 in English, Dutch, German, Spanish, French, or Russian. Raw data were extracted in duplicate using an extraction framework focusing on strategies, involvement of professionals, patient involvement, and implementation. Qualitative content analysis was used. Guideline quality was assessed using AGREE-II. The study was registered with the Open Science Framework.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eight guidelines originating from eight countries were included. The most common recommended strategy was a medication review conducted by a general practitioner and/or a community pharmacist. Tasks and target population differed per guideline. Most guidelines recommended involving the patient in the process, mostly to elicit the patient's experiences and treatment goals. Few guidelines included advice on the implementation of recommendations. Three out of eight guidelines were of good quality (AGREE-II score &gt;70% in 5/6 domains).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most guidelines recommended a medication review, with patient involvement, as a strategy for medication management in polypharmacy in primary care. Guidance on task division and implementation of guidelines in practice was less clear. This review illustrates room for guideline improvements.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923579/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.70015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.70015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:不适当的多种用药增加了药物相关问题的风险。综合用药的适当管理是一项挑战,涉及不同的医疗保健专业人员,复杂的决策,理想情况下包括患者参与。本综述的目的是概述国家对初级保健中使用多种药物的患者的用药管理建议。方法:对适用于初级保健的成人综合用药管理的临床实践指南进行范围审查。对数据库(G-I-N、将研究转化为实践和PubMed)、网络和一份全球报告进行了筛选,以便在2000年以后以英语、荷兰语、德语、西班牙语、法语或俄语出版指南。使用侧重于策略、专业人员参与、患者参与和实施的提取框架一式两份提取原始数据。采用定性含量分析。使用AGREE-II评估指南质量。该研究已在开放科学框架注册。结果:纳入了来自8个国家的8项指南。最常见的推荐策略是由全科医生和/或社区药剂师进行药物审查。每个指南的任务和目标人群不同。大多数指南建议让患者参与到治疗过程中,主要是为了引出患者的经历和治疗目标。很少有准则包括关于执行建议的咨询意见。8个指南中有3个质量良好(在5/6个领域中AGREE-II得分为bbb70 %)。结论:大多数指南建议在患者参与的情况下进行药物审查,作为初级保健综合药房的药物管理策略。关于任务划分和在实践中执行准则的指导则不太明确。这篇综述说明了指南改进的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Medication Management in Patients With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Medication Management in Patients With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Objective

Inappropriate polypharmacy increases the risk of medication-related issues. Adequate management of polypharmacy is a challenge involving different healthcare professionals, complex decision-making and ideally including patient involvement. The objective of this scoping review was to provide an overview of national recommendations for medication management of patients with polypharmacy in primary care.

Methods

A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines focusing on medication management in adults with polypharmacy, applicable to primary care was performed. Databases (G-I-N, Turning Research into Practice and PubMed), network, and a global report were screened for guidelines published after 2000 in English, Dutch, German, Spanish, French, or Russian. Raw data were extracted in duplicate using an extraction framework focusing on strategies, involvement of professionals, patient involvement, and implementation. Qualitative content analysis was used. Guideline quality was assessed using AGREE-II. The study was registered with the Open Science Framework.

Results

Eight guidelines originating from eight countries were included. The most common recommended strategy was a medication review conducted by a general practitioner and/or a community pharmacist. Tasks and target population differed per guideline. Most guidelines recommended involving the patient in the process, mostly to elicit the patient's experiences and treatment goals. Few guidelines included advice on the implementation of recommendations. Three out of eight guidelines were of good quality (AGREE-II score >70% in 5/6 domains).

Conclusions

Most guidelines recommended a medication review, with patient involvement, as a strategy for medication management in polypharmacy in primary care. Guidance on task division and implementation of guidelines in practice was less clear. This review illustrates room for guideline improvements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信