Iryna Lastovytska, Silke Heidenreich, Evgeny Klyuchnikov, Christian Niederwieser, Nico Gagelmann, Johanna Richter, Radwan Massoud, Kristin Rathje, Tetiana Perekhrestenko, Gaby Zeck, Catherina Lück, Dietlinde Janson, Christine Wolschke, Francis Ayuk, Nicolaus Kröger
{"title":"同种异体干细胞移植后类固醇难治性急性移植物抗宿主病,鲁索利替尼联合体外光移植术治疗后慢性移植物抗宿主病的发生率较单独鲁索利替尼低。","authors":"Iryna Lastovytska, Silke Heidenreich, Evgeny Klyuchnikov, Christian Niederwieser, Nico Gagelmann, Johanna Richter, Radwan Massoud, Kristin Rathje, Tetiana Perekhrestenko, Gaby Zeck, Catherina Lück, Dietlinde Janson, Christine Wolschke, Francis Ayuk, Nicolaus Kröger","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2024.286824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared long-term outcomes in 78 patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD) treated at the University Medical Center Hamburg, Germany, between December 2015 and August 2022 who received either ruxolitinib alone (Ruxo, N=29) or Ruxo plus extracorporeal photopheresis (Ruxo-ECP, N=49). Patients were well balanced between both arms except for SR-aGvHD grade IV which was higher in the Ruxo-ECP group (45% vs. 14%, P<0.001). In both cohorts, steroids were tapered rapidly, and median steroid treatment was 39 days in Ruxo and 35 days in Ruxo-ECP. The overall response rate including complete remissions (CR) of aGvHD at day 28 was 90% and 31% for Ruxo versus 86% and 0% (P<0.001, respectively) for Ruxo-ECP. At six months, partial remission (PR) and CR status of evaluable patients was 11% and 50% in Ruxo-ECP versus 10% and 40% after Ruxo alone, respectively (P=0.018). At 12 months, PR and CR status was 6% and 17% in the Ruxo group, but 82% and 64% (P<0.001) in the Ruxo-ECP cohort, and the cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was significantly higher after Ruxo versus Ruxo-ECP at 49% (95% CI: 33-69%) versus 24% (95% CI: 15-38%) (P=0.01). Reconstitution of B cells occurred significantly earlier at one and three months in the Ruxo arm. No difference in 1-year non-relapse mortality, relapse, and 2-year overall survival was observed. Despite the limitations of this retrospective single- center study, the data suggest a better long-term control of aGvHD and less chronic GvHD at one year combining ruxolitinib with ECP compared to ruxolitinib alone in SR-aGvHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"1536-1544"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower incidence of chronic graft-<i>versus</i>-host disease after ruxolitinib plus extracorporeal photopheresis versus ruxolitinib alone in steroid-refractory acute graft-<i>versus</i>-host disease following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Iryna Lastovytska, Silke Heidenreich, Evgeny Klyuchnikov, Christian Niederwieser, Nico Gagelmann, Johanna Richter, Radwan Massoud, Kristin Rathje, Tetiana Perekhrestenko, Gaby Zeck, Catherina Lück, Dietlinde Janson, Christine Wolschke, Francis Ayuk, Nicolaus Kröger\",\"doi\":\"10.3324/haematol.2024.286824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We compared long-term outcomes in 78 patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD) treated at the University Medical Center Hamburg, Germany, between December 2015 and August 2022 who received either ruxolitinib alone (Ruxo, N=29) or Ruxo plus extracorporeal photopheresis (Ruxo-ECP, N=49). Patients were well balanced between both arms except for SR-aGvHD grade IV which was higher in the Ruxo-ECP group (45% vs. 14%, P<0.001). In both cohorts, steroids were tapered rapidly, and median steroid treatment was 39 days in Ruxo and 35 days in Ruxo-ECP. The overall response rate including complete remissions (CR) of aGvHD at day 28 was 90% and 31% for Ruxo versus 86% and 0% (P<0.001, respectively) for Ruxo-ECP. At six months, partial remission (PR) and CR status of evaluable patients was 11% and 50% in Ruxo-ECP versus 10% and 40% after Ruxo alone, respectively (P=0.018). At 12 months, PR and CR status was 6% and 17% in the Ruxo group, but 82% and 64% (P<0.001) in the Ruxo-ECP cohort, and the cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was significantly higher after Ruxo versus Ruxo-ECP at 49% (95% CI: 33-69%) versus 24% (95% CI: 15-38%) (P=0.01). Reconstitution of B cells occurred significantly earlier at one and three months in the Ruxo arm. No difference in 1-year non-relapse mortality, relapse, and 2-year overall survival was observed. Despite the limitations of this retrospective single- center study, the data suggest a better long-term control of aGvHD and less chronic GvHD at one year combining ruxolitinib with ECP compared to ruxolitinib alone in SR-aGvHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haematologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1536-1544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208160/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2024.286824\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2024.286824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们比较了2015年12月至2022年8月期间在德国汉堡大学医学中心治疗的78例类固醇难治性急性移植物抗宿主病(SR-aGVHD)患者的长期预后,这些患者接受鲁索替尼单独治疗(Ruxo, n=29)或鲁xo加体外光疗(Ruxo- ecp, n=49)。除了Ruxo-ECP组更高的SR-aGVHD IV级(45% vs. 14%, p。
Lower incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease after ruxolitinib plus extracorporeal photopheresis versus ruxolitinib alone in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
We compared long-term outcomes in 78 patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD) treated at the University Medical Center Hamburg, Germany, between December 2015 and August 2022 who received either ruxolitinib alone (Ruxo, N=29) or Ruxo plus extracorporeal photopheresis (Ruxo-ECP, N=49). Patients were well balanced between both arms except for SR-aGvHD grade IV which was higher in the Ruxo-ECP group (45% vs. 14%, P<0.001). In both cohorts, steroids were tapered rapidly, and median steroid treatment was 39 days in Ruxo and 35 days in Ruxo-ECP. The overall response rate including complete remissions (CR) of aGvHD at day 28 was 90% and 31% for Ruxo versus 86% and 0% (P<0.001, respectively) for Ruxo-ECP. At six months, partial remission (PR) and CR status of evaluable patients was 11% and 50% in Ruxo-ECP versus 10% and 40% after Ruxo alone, respectively (P=0.018). At 12 months, PR and CR status was 6% and 17% in the Ruxo group, but 82% and 64% (P<0.001) in the Ruxo-ECP cohort, and the cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was significantly higher after Ruxo versus Ruxo-ECP at 49% (95% CI: 33-69%) versus 24% (95% CI: 15-38%) (P=0.01). Reconstitution of B cells occurred significantly earlier at one and three months in the Ruxo arm. No difference in 1-year non-relapse mortality, relapse, and 2-year overall survival was observed. Despite the limitations of this retrospective single- center study, the data suggest a better long-term control of aGvHD and less chronic GvHD at one year combining ruxolitinib with ECP compared to ruxolitinib alone in SR-aGvHD.
期刊介绍:
Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research.
Scope:
The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that:
Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases.
Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.