生物疗法治疗克罗恩病的有效性和安全性:荟萃分析和系统综述的综合综述。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ping Jiang, Yunchen Li, Jidong Tian, Yuan Luo, Hu Xiangxiang, Xinhui Qiu, Chen Guo, Fu Cuicui
{"title":"生物疗法治疗克罗恩病的有效性和安全性:荟萃分析和系统综述的综合综述。","authors":"Ping Jiang, Yunchen Li, Jidong Tian, Yuan Luo, Hu Xiangxiang, Xinhui Qiu, Chen Guo, Fu Cuicui","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2025.502432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present an overview to summarize the efficacy and safety of biologics for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We gathered systematic reviews or meta-analyses on the efficacy and safety of biologic therapy for CD from the beginning to September 30, 2023, by searching the databases of the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase. Analysing reviews and extracting data, two researchers worked independently. Any discrepancies in the two researchers' assessments of the review process were reevaluated, and the argument was settled by consulting to other researchers. The following details was taken out of the data: author, publication year, study type, number of included studies, country of study, sample size, risk bias tools, biologic therapy, and primary outcomes. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and the AMSTAR-2, a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews (2nd edition), were then utilized to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 19 reviews in all. 1 systematic review, 5 meta-analyses, and 13 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were among the reviews that were included. 9 studies met the high quality, 5 met the moderate quality, 3 met the poor quality, and 2 met the critically low quality requirements of the AMSTAR-2 criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis of the evidence finds biologic agents for CD are effective and safe. Overall, there was moderate to high quality biologic evidence for CD, but future head-to-head controlled studies are required to better inform the relative positioning of these drugs for the management of CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":" ","pages":"502432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eficacia y seguridad de la terapia biológica en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Crohn: una revisión exhaustiva de metanálisis y revisiones sistemáticas.\",\"authors\":\"Ping Jiang, Yunchen Li, Jidong Tian, Yuan Luo, Hu Xiangxiang, Xinhui Qiu, Chen Guo, Fu Cuicui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2025.502432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present an overview to summarize the efficacy and safety of biologics for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We gathered systematic reviews or meta-analyses on the efficacy and safety of biologic therapy for CD from the beginning to September 30, 2023, by searching the databases of the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase. Analysing reviews and extracting data, two researchers worked independently. Any discrepancies in the two researchers' assessments of the review process were reevaluated, and the argument was settled by consulting to other researchers. The following details was taken out of the data: author, publication year, study type, number of included studies, country of study, sample size, risk bias tools, biologic therapy, and primary outcomes. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and the AMSTAR-2, a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews (2nd edition), were then utilized to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 19 reviews in all. 1 systematic review, 5 meta-analyses, and 13 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were among the reviews that were included. 9 studies met the high quality, 5 met the moderate quality, 3 met the poor quality, and 2 met the critically low quality requirements of the AMSTAR-2 criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis of the evidence finds biologic agents for CD are effective and safe. Overall, there was moderate to high quality biologic evidence for CD, but future head-to-head controlled studies are required to better inform the relative positioning of these drugs for the management of CD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"502432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2025.502432\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2025.502432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:综述生物制剂治疗克罗恩病(CD)的疗效和安全性。方法:通过检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据、中国科技期刊数据库、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase等数据库,收集从2023年9月30日开始至2023年9月30日期间有关CD生物治疗疗效和安全性的系统评价或荟萃分析。分析评论和提取数据,两位研究人员独立工作。两位研究人员对评审过程的评估中的任何差异都被重新评估,并通过咨询其他研究人员来解决争论。从数据中提取了以下详细信息:作者、出版年份、研究类型、纳入研究的数量、研究国家、样本量、风险偏倚工具、生物治疗和主要结果。然后使用推荐、评估、发展和评估等级(GRADE)和AMSTAR-2(系统评价的关键评估工具)(第二版)来评估证据的方法学质量和报告质量。结果:共19篇综述。纳入的综述包括1篇系统综述,5篇荟萃分析,13篇系统综述和荟萃分析。9项研究达到AMSTAR-2标准的高质量要求,5项达到中等质量要求,3项达到低质量要求,2项达到极低质量要求。结论:经证据分析,生物制剂治疗乳糜泻是安全有效的。总的来说,有中度到高质量的乳糜泻生物学证据,但需要未来的头对头对照研究来更好地告知这些药物在乳糜泻治疗中的相对定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eficacia y seguridad de la terapia biológica en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Crohn: una revisión exhaustiva de metanálisis y revisiones sistemáticas.

Objective: To present an overview to summarize the efficacy and safety of biologics for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD).

Methods: We gathered systematic reviews or meta-analyses on the efficacy and safety of biologic therapy for CD from the beginning to September 30, 2023, by searching the databases of the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase. Analysing reviews and extracting data, two researchers worked independently. Any discrepancies in the two researchers' assessments of the review process were reevaluated, and the argument was settled by consulting to other researchers. The following details was taken out of the data: author, publication year, study type, number of included studies, country of study, sample size, risk bias tools, biologic therapy, and primary outcomes. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and the AMSTAR-2, a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews (2nd edition), were then utilized to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of the evidence.

Results: There were 19 reviews in all. 1 systematic review, 5 meta-analyses, and 13 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were among the reviews that were included. 9 studies met the high quality, 5 met the moderate quality, 3 met the poor quality, and 2 met the critically low quality requirements of the AMSTAR-2 criteria.

Conclusions: The analysis of the evidence finds biologic agents for CD are effective and safe. Overall, there was moderate to high quality biologic evidence for CD, but future head-to-head controlled studies are required to better inform the relative positioning of these drugs for the management of CD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the first journal to cover the latest advances in pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and bile ducts, making it an indispensable tool for gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信