床边超声引导造影剂灌肠治疗疑似胎便塞综合征的早产儿:10年单中心经验。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Won-Seok Yoo, Haesung Yoon, In Geol Ho, Jisoo Kim, Hyun Ji Lim, Jung-Tak Oh, Hoseon Eun, Mi-Jung Lee
{"title":"床边超声引导造影剂灌肠治疗疑似胎便塞综合征的早产儿:10年单中心经验。","authors":"Won-Seok Yoo, Haesung Yoon, In Geol Ho, Jisoo Kim, Hyun Ji Lim, Jung-Tak Oh, Hoseon Eun, Mi-Jung Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11511-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bedside ultrasound-guided contrast enema (US-enema) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and to assess factors associated with its outcome.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included preterm NICU babies who underwent US-enema for suspected meconium plug syndrome between 2014 and 2023. Patient characteristics, procedure-related factors, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) grades on US, presence of microcolon, and outcomes were reviewed. Group comparison and correlation analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two patients (mean gestational age at birth, 27.1 ± 2.5 weeks; mean birth weight, 872.0 ± 378.5 g; 45 males) with 128 sessions of US-enema were enrolled. Forty patients had no NEC, 32 had grade 1 NEC, and 10 had grade 2 NEC. Enema was repeated in 37 patients (45.1%), up to four times. The mean age at initial US-enema was 17.3 days. US-enema was successful in 68.3% (56/82) of patients. There were three events (3/128, 2.3%) of bowel perforation during enema, all had microcolon (p = 0.02), and two cases (2/82, 2.4%) of bowel-related mortality. Patients with enema success had higher gestational age at birth (27.6 vs. 25.9 weeks; p = 0.006), were older at initial enema (19.3 vs. 13.0 days; p = 0.02), and showed microcolon less frequently (12.5% (7/56) vs. 61.5% (16/26); p < 0.001) than those with enema failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-enema is safe and effective for preterm NICU babies with suspected meconium plug syndrome. Higher gestational age at birth and older age at enema without microcolon were associated with successful enema.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Bedside ultrasound-guided contrast enema (US-enema) is considered an effective technique for preterm neonates with meconium plug syndrome, but data on outcome-related factors are limited. Findings US-enema successfully treated 68.3% of patients, with a 2.3% rate of bowel perforation. Higher gestational/postnatal age and absence of microcolon were associated with successful enemas. Clinical relevance US-enema is an effective and safe technique for meconium plug syndrome with a low risk of complications. Preterm neonates with higher gestational age at birth, older age at the time of enema, and without microcolon showed better treatment responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bedside ultrasound-guided contrast enema for preterm infants with suspected meconium plug syndrome: a 10-year single-center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Won-Seok Yoo, Haesung Yoon, In Geol Ho, Jisoo Kim, Hyun Ji Lim, Jung-Tak Oh, Hoseon Eun, Mi-Jung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-025-11511-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bedside ultrasound-guided contrast enema (US-enema) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and to assess factors associated with its outcome.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included preterm NICU babies who underwent US-enema for suspected meconium plug syndrome between 2014 and 2023. Patient characteristics, procedure-related factors, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) grades on US, presence of microcolon, and outcomes were reviewed. Group comparison and correlation analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two patients (mean gestational age at birth, 27.1 ± 2.5 weeks; mean birth weight, 872.0 ± 378.5 g; 45 males) with 128 sessions of US-enema were enrolled. Forty patients had no NEC, 32 had grade 1 NEC, and 10 had grade 2 NEC. Enema was repeated in 37 patients (45.1%), up to four times. The mean age at initial US-enema was 17.3 days. US-enema was successful in 68.3% (56/82) of patients. There were three events (3/128, 2.3%) of bowel perforation during enema, all had microcolon (p = 0.02), and two cases (2/82, 2.4%) of bowel-related mortality. Patients with enema success had higher gestational age at birth (27.6 vs. 25.9 weeks; p = 0.006), were older at initial enema (19.3 vs. 13.0 days; p = 0.02), and showed microcolon less frequently (12.5% (7/56) vs. 61.5% (16/26); p < 0.001) than those with enema failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-enema is safe and effective for preterm NICU babies with suspected meconium plug syndrome. Higher gestational age at birth and older age at enema without microcolon were associated with successful enema.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Bedside ultrasound-guided contrast enema (US-enema) is considered an effective technique for preterm neonates with meconium plug syndrome, but data on outcome-related factors are limited. Findings US-enema successfully treated 68.3% of patients, with a 2.3% rate of bowel perforation. Higher gestational/postnatal age and absence of microcolon were associated with successful enemas. Clinical relevance US-enema is an effective and safe technique for meconium plug syndrome with a low risk of complications. Preterm neonates with higher gestational age at birth, older age at the time of enema, and without microcolon showed better treatment responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11511-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11511-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价床边超声引导造影剂灌肠(us -灌肠)在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的安全性和有效性,并评价影响其预后的相关因素。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入2014年至2023年间因疑似胎便塞综合征接受us灌肠的新生儿重症监护病房早产儿。回顾了患者特征、手术相关因素、坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)在美国的分级、微结肠的存在和结果。进行组间比较和相关性分析。结果:82例患者(平均胎龄27.1±2.5周;平均出生体重872.0±378.5 g;45名男性)进行128次美国灌肠。40例患者无NEC, 32例为1级NEC, 10例为2级NEC。37例(45.1%)患者重复灌肠,最多4次。初始us灌肠时的平均年龄为17.3天。美国灌肠成功率为68.3%(56/82)。灌肠时肠穿孔3例(3/128,2.3%),均有微结肠(p = 0.02),肠道相关死亡2例(2/82,2.4%)。灌肠成功的患者出生时胎龄更高(27.6周vs 25.9周;P = 0.006),初始灌肠时年龄较大(19.3天vs. 13.0天;P = 0.02),且微结肠发生率较低(12.5% (7/56)vs. 61.5% (16/26);结论:us灌肠治疗疑似胎塞综合征的NICU早产儿安全有效。出生时胎龄越高,灌肠时无微结肠的年龄越大,灌肠成功率越高。床边超声引导对比灌肠(us -灌肠)被认为是治疗胎塞综合征早产儿的有效技术,但有关结果相关因素的数据有限。结果:美国灌肠成功率为68.3%,肠穿孔发生率为2.3%。较高的胎龄/产后年龄和没有微结肠与灌肠成功有关。超声灌肠是治疗胎便塞综合征的一种安全有效的技术,并发症风险低。出生胎龄较高、灌肠时胎龄较大、未出现微结肠的早产儿治疗效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bedside ultrasound-guided contrast enema for preterm infants with suspected meconium plug syndrome: a 10-year single-center experience.

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bedside ultrasound-guided contrast enema (US-enema) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and to assess factors associated with its outcome.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included preterm NICU babies who underwent US-enema for suspected meconium plug syndrome between 2014 and 2023. Patient characteristics, procedure-related factors, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) grades on US, presence of microcolon, and outcomes were reviewed. Group comparison and correlation analyses were performed.

Results: Eighty-two patients (mean gestational age at birth, 27.1 ± 2.5 weeks; mean birth weight, 872.0 ± 378.5 g; 45 males) with 128 sessions of US-enema were enrolled. Forty patients had no NEC, 32 had grade 1 NEC, and 10 had grade 2 NEC. Enema was repeated in 37 patients (45.1%), up to four times. The mean age at initial US-enema was 17.3 days. US-enema was successful in 68.3% (56/82) of patients. There were three events (3/128, 2.3%) of bowel perforation during enema, all had microcolon (p = 0.02), and two cases (2/82, 2.4%) of bowel-related mortality. Patients with enema success had higher gestational age at birth (27.6 vs. 25.9 weeks; p = 0.006), were older at initial enema (19.3 vs. 13.0 days; p = 0.02), and showed microcolon less frequently (12.5% (7/56) vs. 61.5% (16/26); p < 0.001) than those with enema failure.

Conclusion: US-enema is safe and effective for preterm NICU babies with suspected meconium plug syndrome. Higher gestational age at birth and older age at enema without microcolon were associated with successful enema.

Key points: Question Bedside ultrasound-guided contrast enema (US-enema) is considered an effective technique for preterm neonates with meconium plug syndrome, but data on outcome-related factors are limited. Findings US-enema successfully treated 68.3% of patients, with a 2.3% rate of bowel perforation. Higher gestational/postnatal age and absence of microcolon were associated with successful enemas. Clinical relevance US-enema is an effective and safe technique for meconium plug syndrome with a low risk of complications. Preterm neonates with higher gestational age at birth, older age at the time of enema, and without microcolon showed better treatment responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信