探索癌症治疗临床决策支持系统的可用性:一项以用户为中心的研究。

IF 1.9 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer reports Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70173
Darya Chyzhyk, Maddi Arregi, Maria Errazquin, Ainhoa Ariceta, Macarena Sevilla, Roberto Álvarez, Maider Alberich Inchausti
{"title":"探索癌症治疗临床决策支持系统的可用性:一项以用户为中心的研究。","authors":"Darya Chyzhyk,&nbsp;Maddi Arregi,&nbsp;Maria Errazquin,&nbsp;Ainhoa Ariceta,&nbsp;Macarena Sevilla,&nbsp;Roberto Álvarez,&nbsp;Maider Alberich Inchausti","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Adverse effects are a common burden for cancer patients, impacting their well-being and diminishing their quality of life. Therefore, it is essential to have a clinical decision support system that can proactively monitor patient progress to prevent and manage complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This research aims to thoroughly test the usability and user-friendliness of a medical device designed for managing adverse events for cancer patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). The study seeks to assess how well the device meets both patients' and HCPs' needs in real-world scenarios.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study used a multi-method approach to obtain a comprehensive understanding of participants experience and objective measure of usability. The testing was conducted with a diverse group of participants of six patients and six HCPs. Analysis included a descriptive summary of the demographic data, scenario completion rates, System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire score, and qualitative feedback from users. All participants successfully completed 100% of the activities, indicating a high level of understanding and usability across both user groups. Only two out of six patients encountered errors during the login activities, but these errors were unrelated to product safety. The obtained SUS score is in the 90th percentile for both user groups, classifying the device as grade A and highlighting its superior usability. Patients and HCPs found the interface intuitive and expressed an interest in incorporating the application into their daily routines and would recommend the application to others.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The assessed digital health medical device demonstrates excellent usability, safety, and ease of use for oncology patients and HCPs. Based on the received constructive feedback, minor improvements were identified for further refinement of the application that do not affect either its intended functionality or the overall functioning of the tool. Future work will focus on implementing these improvements and conducting further usability studies in clinical environments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System for Cancer Care: A User-Centered Study\",\"authors\":\"Darya Chyzhyk,&nbsp;Maddi Arregi,&nbsp;Maria Errazquin,&nbsp;Ainhoa Ariceta,&nbsp;Macarena Sevilla,&nbsp;Roberto Álvarez,&nbsp;Maider Alberich Inchausti\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnr2.70173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adverse effects are a common burden for cancer patients, impacting their well-being and diminishing their quality of life. Therefore, it is essential to have a clinical decision support system that can proactively monitor patient progress to prevent and manage complications.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research aims to thoroughly test the usability and user-friendliness of a medical device designed for managing adverse events for cancer patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). The study seeks to assess how well the device meets both patients' and HCPs' needs in real-world scenarios.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study used a multi-method approach to obtain a comprehensive understanding of participants experience and objective measure of usability. The testing was conducted with a diverse group of participants of six patients and six HCPs. Analysis included a descriptive summary of the demographic data, scenario completion rates, System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire score, and qualitative feedback from users. All participants successfully completed 100% of the activities, indicating a high level of understanding and usability across both user groups. Only two out of six patients encountered errors during the login activities, but these errors were unrelated to product safety. The obtained SUS score is in the 90th percentile for both user groups, classifying the device as grade A and highlighting its superior usability. Patients and HCPs found the interface intuitive and expressed an interest in incorporating the application into their daily routines and would recommend the application to others.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The assessed digital health medical device demonstrates excellent usability, safety, and ease of use for oncology patients and HCPs. Based on the received constructive feedback, minor improvements were identified for further refinement of the application that do not affect either its intended functionality or the overall functioning of the tool. Future work will focus on implementing these improvements and conducting further usability studies in clinical environments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer reports\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不良反应是癌症患者的常见负担,影响他们的健康并降低他们的生活质量。因此,必须有一个临床决策支持系统,可以主动监测患者的进展,以预防和管理并发症。目的:本研究旨在彻底测试一种用于管理癌症患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)不良事件的医疗设备的可用性和用户友好性。该研究旨在评估该设备在现实世界中如何满足患者和医护人员的需求。方法与结果:本研究采用多方法方法对参与者体验进行全面了解,对可用性进行客观测量。该测试是在六名患者和六名医护人员的不同参与者组中进行的。分析包括人口统计数据的描述性总结,场景完成率,系统可用性量表(SUS)问卷得分,以及来自用户的定性反馈。所有参与者都成功完成了100%的活动,这表明两个用户组的理解和可用性都很高。六名患者中只有两名在登录活动中遇到错误,但这些错误与产品安全无关。获得的SUS分数在两个用户组的第90百分位,将设备分类为A级,并突出其优越的可用性。患者和医护人员发现界面很直观,并表示有兴趣将该应用程序纳入他们的日常生活,并将该应用程序推荐给其他人。结论:所评估的数字健康医疗设备对肿瘤患者和医护人员具有良好的可用性、安全性和易用性。根据收到的建设性反馈,确定了用于进一步细化应用程序的小改进,这些改进既不影响其预期功能,也不影响工具的整体功能。未来的工作将集中在实施这些改进,并在临床环境中进行进一步的可用性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System for Cancer Care: A User-Centered Study

Exploring Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System for Cancer Care: A User-Centered Study

Background

Adverse effects are a common burden for cancer patients, impacting their well-being and diminishing their quality of life. Therefore, it is essential to have a clinical decision support system that can proactively monitor patient progress to prevent and manage complications.

Aims

This research aims to thoroughly test the usability and user-friendliness of a medical device designed for managing adverse events for cancer patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). The study seeks to assess how well the device meets both patients' and HCPs' needs in real-world scenarios.

Methods and Results

The study used a multi-method approach to obtain a comprehensive understanding of participants experience and objective measure of usability. The testing was conducted with a diverse group of participants of six patients and six HCPs. Analysis included a descriptive summary of the demographic data, scenario completion rates, System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire score, and qualitative feedback from users. All participants successfully completed 100% of the activities, indicating a high level of understanding and usability across both user groups. Only two out of six patients encountered errors during the login activities, but these errors were unrelated to product safety. The obtained SUS score is in the 90th percentile for both user groups, classifying the device as grade A and highlighting its superior usability. Patients and HCPs found the interface intuitive and expressed an interest in incorporating the application into their daily routines and would recommend the application to others.

Conclusion

The assessed digital health medical device demonstrates excellent usability, safety, and ease of use for oncology patients and HCPs. Based on the received constructive feedback, minor improvements were identified for further refinement of the application that do not affect either its intended functionality or the overall functioning of the tool. Future work will focus on implementing these improvements and conducting further usability studies in clinical environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信