自我制定的技术使用和身体活动:习惯形成和维持的比较定性研究。

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Eleonoora Hintsa, Martin S. Hagger, Taru Lintunen, Kyra Hamilton, Keegan Knittle
{"title":"自我制定的技术使用和身体活动:习惯形成和维持的比较定性研究。","authors":"Eleonoora Hintsa,&nbsp;Martin S. Hagger,&nbsp;Taru Lintunen,&nbsp;Kyra Hamilton,&nbsp;Keegan Knittle","doi":"10.1111/aphw.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is minimal empirical evidence on which techniques effectively promote physical activity habit formation. This qualitative study addresses this knowledge gap by identifying the self-enactable techniques that people with varying levels of physical activity experience and habit strength use to support their own physical activity behavior and form or maintain habits. Novice (<i>n</i> = 8), intermediate (<i>n</i> = 8), and expert (<i>n</i> = 8) exercisers were recruited via purposive sampling to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analyzed with deductive content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. Forty-five self-enactable techniques were frequently reported in at least one of the experience groups. Thematic analyses indicated seeming differences in technique use across experience levels, from information seeking and support among novices, to acceptance and overcoming initiation inertia among intermediates, to environmental restructuring and personal growth among experts. Increasing experience also seemed associated with a greater focus on the short-term benefits of physical activity and flexible, broad-based automatic approaches to planning and self-regulation. Within-person longitudinal studies using validated measures that capture nuance in technique use can improve scientific understanding of habit formation processes in physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-enactable technique use and physical activity: A comparative qualitative study of habit formation and maintenance\",\"authors\":\"Eleonoora Hintsa,&nbsp;Martin S. Hagger,&nbsp;Taru Lintunen,&nbsp;Kyra Hamilton,&nbsp;Keegan Knittle\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aphw.70016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is minimal empirical evidence on which techniques effectively promote physical activity habit formation. This qualitative study addresses this knowledge gap by identifying the self-enactable techniques that people with varying levels of physical activity experience and habit strength use to support their own physical activity behavior and form or maintain habits. Novice (<i>n</i> = 8), intermediate (<i>n</i> = 8), and expert (<i>n</i> = 8) exercisers were recruited via purposive sampling to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analyzed with deductive content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. Forty-five self-enactable techniques were frequently reported in at least one of the experience groups. Thematic analyses indicated seeming differences in technique use across experience levels, from information seeking and support among novices, to acceptance and overcoming initiation inertia among intermediates, to environmental restructuring and personal growth among experts. Increasing experience also seemed associated with a greater focus on the short-term benefits of physical activity and flexible, broad-based automatic approaches to planning and self-regulation. Within-person longitudinal studies using validated measures that capture nuance in technique use can improve scientific understanding of habit formation processes in physical activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied psychology. Health and well-being\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied psychology. Health and well-being\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aphw.70016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aphw.70016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很少有经验证据表明技术能有效地促进体育活动习惯的形成。本定性研究通过确定具有不同体育活动经验水平和习惯强度的人用来支持自己的体育活动行为并形成或保持习惯的自我实施技术来解决这一知识差距。采用有目的抽样的方法,招募新手(n = 8)、中级(n = 8)和专家级(n = 8)锻炼者参加半结构化访谈。访谈分析采用演绎内容分析和归纳主题分析。至少有一个体验组经常报告45种自我实施的技巧。专题分析表明,从新手的信息寻求和支持,到中级人员的接受和克服入门惰性,再到专家的环境调整和个人成长,不同经验水平的技术使用似乎存在差异。经验的增加似乎还与更关注体育活动的短期效益以及灵活、广泛的自动规划和自我调节方法有关。使用有效的测量方法进行的个人纵向研究可以捕捉技术使用中的细微差别,从而提高对体育活动中习惯形成过程的科学理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-enactable technique use and physical activity: A comparative qualitative study of habit formation and maintenance

There is minimal empirical evidence on which techniques effectively promote physical activity habit formation. This qualitative study addresses this knowledge gap by identifying the self-enactable techniques that people with varying levels of physical activity experience and habit strength use to support their own physical activity behavior and form or maintain habits. Novice (n = 8), intermediate (n = 8), and expert (n = 8) exercisers were recruited via purposive sampling to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analyzed with deductive content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. Forty-five self-enactable techniques were frequently reported in at least one of the experience groups. Thematic analyses indicated seeming differences in technique use across experience levels, from information seeking and support among novices, to acceptance and overcoming initiation inertia among intermediates, to environmental restructuring and personal growth among experts. Increasing experience also seemed associated with a greater focus on the short-term benefits of physical activity and flexible, broad-based automatic approaches to planning and self-regulation. Within-person longitudinal studies using validated measures that capture nuance in technique use can improve scientific understanding of habit formation processes in physical activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信