一项关于日本重度抑郁症治疗前景和目标设定的医患沟通调查。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Takashi Tsuboi, Takeo Nakayama, Junko Horie, Fumie Tokuda, Yoshiya Moriguchi, Tatsuya Hoshino
{"title":"一项关于日本重度抑郁症治疗前景和目标设定的医患沟通调查。","authors":"Takashi Tsuboi, Takeo Nakayama, Junko Horie, Fumie Tokuda, Yoshiya Moriguchi, Tatsuya Hoshino","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06606-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating cause of disability worldwide. Recently, it has been suggested that individualized goal setting may play a role in patient-centered recovery. This study aimed to survey the landscape of patient-physician communication around goal setting for MDD treatment, as well as understand whether goal setting using the SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound) framework is associated with positive treatment indicators in MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in Japan (≥ 18 years of age) who self-reported a verified MDD diagnosis were eligible to complete a self-administered survey through the Personal Health Record service, a web-based smartphone app. Patients were asked about whether they communicated with physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. A 'SMART-Goal score' tool was developed to evaluate patient goals against the five SMART criteria. Treatment satisfaction scores and scores on the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale Short Version (TRUST) were assessed as indicators of outcomes in this study. Descriptive questions were used to explore patients' perceptions of goal setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 466 patients were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The majority (70.0%) reported communicating with their physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. These patients (Com + group) had a median (Q1, Q3) TRUST score of 70.0 (60.0, 80.0), compared with 50.0 (40.0, 70.0) in patients who reported an absence of communication (Com - group). Median (Q1, Q3) treatment satisfaction scores were 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) and 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) for the Com + and Com - groups, respectively. In high SMART-Goal scoring groups, approximately 75% of patients exceeded the overall median scores for TRUST (70.0) or treatment satisfaction (5.0) reported for the Com + group; only 25% of patients in low SMART-Goal scoring groups achieved the same in either measure. Most patients (89.3%) who set goals recommended goal setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study suggests that communication between patients and physicians regarding goal setting in MDD treatment may be associated with positive patient perceptions of treatment. High-quality SMART goal setting also appears to have positive aspects for patients with MDD, which may in turn affect treatment outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000050370) on 17 February 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"255"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of patient-physician communication regarding treatment prospects and goal setting in the management of major depressive disorder in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Tsuboi, Takeo Nakayama, Junko Horie, Fumie Tokuda, Yoshiya Moriguchi, Tatsuya Hoshino\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-025-06606-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating cause of disability worldwide. Recently, it has been suggested that individualized goal setting may play a role in patient-centered recovery. This study aimed to survey the landscape of patient-physician communication around goal setting for MDD treatment, as well as understand whether goal setting using the SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound) framework is associated with positive treatment indicators in MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in Japan (≥ 18 years of age) who self-reported a verified MDD diagnosis were eligible to complete a self-administered survey through the Personal Health Record service, a web-based smartphone app. Patients were asked about whether they communicated with physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. A 'SMART-Goal score' tool was developed to evaluate patient goals against the five SMART criteria. Treatment satisfaction scores and scores on the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale Short Version (TRUST) were assessed as indicators of outcomes in this study. Descriptive questions were used to explore patients' perceptions of goal setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 466 patients were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The majority (70.0%) reported communicating with their physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. These patients (Com + group) had a median (Q1, Q3) TRUST score of 70.0 (60.0, 80.0), compared with 50.0 (40.0, 70.0) in patients who reported an absence of communication (Com - group). Median (Q1, Q3) treatment satisfaction scores were 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) and 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) for the Com + and Com - groups, respectively. In high SMART-Goal scoring groups, approximately 75% of patients exceeded the overall median scores for TRUST (70.0) or treatment satisfaction (5.0) reported for the Com + group; only 25% of patients in low SMART-Goal scoring groups achieved the same in either measure. Most patients (89.3%) who set goals recommended goal setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study suggests that communication between patients and physicians regarding goal setting in MDD treatment may be associated with positive patient perceptions of treatment. High-quality SMART goal setting also appears to have positive aspects for patients with MDD, which may in turn affect treatment outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000050370) on 17 February 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921671/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06606-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06606-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重度抑郁症(MDD)是世界范围内常见的致残原因。最近,有人提出个性化的目标设定可能在以患者为中心的康复中发挥作用。本研究旨在调查围绕MDD治疗目标设定的医患沟通情况,并了解使用SMART(具体的、可测量的、可实现的、现实的和有时限的)框架设定目标是否与MDD的积极治疗指标相关。方法:日本(≥18岁)自我报告证实MDD诊断的患者有资格通过个人健康记录服务(基于网络的智能手机应用程序)完成自我管理的调查。患者被问及他们是否与医生就治疗前景和/或目标进行了沟通。开发了“SMART- goal评分”工具,根据5个SMART标准评估患者目标。治疗满意度评分和维克森林医生信任量表短版(Trust)评分被评估为本研究结果的指标。使用描述性问题来探讨患者对目标设定的看法。结果:共有466例患者符合纳入分析的条件。大多数(70.0%)报告与医生就治疗前景和/或目标进行了沟通。这些患者(Com +组)的中位(Q1, Q3) TRUST评分为70.0(60.0,80.0),而报告缺乏交流的患者(Com -组)为50.0(40.0,70.0)。Com +组和Com -组的治疗满意度中位数(Q1, Q3)分别为5.0(4.0,6.0)和4.0(3.0,5.0)。在SMART-Goal评分较高的组中,大约75%的患者超过了Com +组报告的TRUST总分中位数(70.0)或治疗满意度中位数(5.0);在SMART-Goal评分较低的组中,只有25%的患者在两项指标中都达到了相同的水平。大多数患者(89.3%)建议设定目标。结论:本探索性研究表明,患者和医生之间关于重度抑郁症治疗目标设定的沟通可能与患者对治疗的积极看法有关。高质量的SMART目标设定似乎对重度抑郁症患者也有积极的影响,这可能反过来影响治疗结果。需要进一步的研究来证实这些初步发现。试验注册:于2023年2月17日在UMIN临床试验注册中心注册(ID: UMIN000050370)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of patient-physician communication regarding treatment prospects and goal setting in the management of major depressive disorder in Japan.

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating cause of disability worldwide. Recently, it has been suggested that individualized goal setting may play a role in patient-centered recovery. This study aimed to survey the landscape of patient-physician communication around goal setting for MDD treatment, as well as understand whether goal setting using the SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound) framework is associated with positive treatment indicators in MDD.

Methods: Patients in Japan (≥ 18 years of age) who self-reported a verified MDD diagnosis were eligible to complete a self-administered survey through the Personal Health Record service, a web-based smartphone app. Patients were asked about whether they communicated with physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. A 'SMART-Goal score' tool was developed to evaluate patient goals against the five SMART criteria. Treatment satisfaction scores and scores on the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale Short Version (TRUST) were assessed as indicators of outcomes in this study. Descriptive questions were used to explore patients' perceptions of goal setting.

Results: In total, 466 patients were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The majority (70.0%) reported communicating with their physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. These patients (Com + group) had a median (Q1, Q3) TRUST score of 70.0 (60.0, 80.0), compared with 50.0 (40.0, 70.0) in patients who reported an absence of communication (Com - group). Median (Q1, Q3) treatment satisfaction scores were 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) and 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) for the Com + and Com - groups, respectively. In high SMART-Goal scoring groups, approximately 75% of patients exceeded the overall median scores for TRUST (70.0) or treatment satisfaction (5.0) reported for the Com + group; only 25% of patients in low SMART-Goal scoring groups achieved the same in either measure. Most patients (89.3%) who set goals recommended goal setting.

Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that communication between patients and physicians regarding goal setting in MDD treatment may be associated with positive patient perceptions of treatment. High-quality SMART goal setting also appears to have positive aspects for patients with MDD, which may in turn affect treatment outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial findings.

Trial registration: Registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000050370) on 17 February 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信