{"title":"物理医学和康复患者和医疗保健提供者对远程医疗的看法。","authors":"Gabrielle Gilmer, Gwendolyn Sowa","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our purpose was to assess perceptions of telemedicine among physical medicine and rehabilitation patients and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A 28-question online survey was conducted. Patients had to be 18 yrs or older who used telemedicine for a physical medicine and rehabilitation visit. Providers had to be a board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation provider who has used telemedicine in their practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients and 46 providers completed the survey. Patients and providers reported an intention to continue using telemedicine, regardless of insurance coverage/reimbursement. Patients and providers reported circumstances, such as needing a physical examination or a first-time visit, as being preferable for an in-person visit. Patients who were younger or a caretaker were more likely to report being willing to change providers if telemedicine was no longer offered than older or noncaretaker patients. Patients who made less than $30,000 annually or who did not own a car were more likely to report comfortability with telemedicine than patients who made more than $30,000 annually or who owned a car.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemedicine will continue as a staple of physical medicine and rehabilitation health care and is a particularly important resource for patients who are younger, caretakers, make less than $30,000 annually, or do not own a car.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":"104 4","pages":"349-356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Telemedicine Among Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Patients and Healthcare Providers.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Gilmer, Gwendolyn Sowa\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our purpose was to assess perceptions of telemedicine among physical medicine and rehabilitation patients and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A 28-question online survey was conducted. Patients had to be 18 yrs or older who used telemedicine for a physical medicine and rehabilitation visit. Providers had to be a board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation provider who has used telemedicine in their practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients and 46 providers completed the survey. Patients and providers reported an intention to continue using telemedicine, regardless of insurance coverage/reimbursement. Patients and providers reported circumstances, such as needing a physical examination or a first-time visit, as being preferable for an in-person visit. Patients who were younger or a caretaker were more likely to report being willing to change providers if telemedicine was no longer offered than older or noncaretaker patients. Patients who made less than $30,000 annually or who did not own a car were more likely to report comfortability with telemedicine than patients who made more than $30,000 annually or who owned a car.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemedicine will continue as a staple of physical medicine and rehabilitation health care and is a particularly important resource for patients who are younger, caretakers, make less than $30,000 annually, or do not own a car.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"104 4\",\"pages\":\"349-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926332/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002608\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceptions of Telemedicine Among Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Patients and Healthcare Providers.
Objective: Our purpose was to assess perceptions of telemedicine among physical medicine and rehabilitation patients and healthcare providers.
Design: A 28-question online survey was conducted. Patients had to be 18 yrs or older who used telemedicine for a physical medicine and rehabilitation visit. Providers had to be a board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation provider who has used telemedicine in their practice.
Results: Sixty-eight patients and 46 providers completed the survey. Patients and providers reported an intention to continue using telemedicine, regardless of insurance coverage/reimbursement. Patients and providers reported circumstances, such as needing a physical examination or a first-time visit, as being preferable for an in-person visit. Patients who were younger or a caretaker were more likely to report being willing to change providers if telemedicine was no longer offered than older or noncaretaker patients. Patients who made less than $30,000 annually or who did not own a car were more likely to report comfortability with telemedicine than patients who made more than $30,000 annually or who owned a car.
Conclusions: Telemedicine will continue as a staple of physical medicine and rehabilitation health care and is a particularly important resource for patients who are younger, caretakers, make less than $30,000 annually, or do not own a car.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).