主动底部接触齿轮足迹的区域变化

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Mollie Rickwood, Chris Kerry, Ole R. Eigaard, Antonello Sala, Ciarán McLaverty, Callum M. Roberts, Brendan J. Godley, Kristian Metcalfe
{"title":"主动底部接触齿轮足迹的区域变化","authors":"Mollie Rickwood,&nbsp;Chris Kerry,&nbsp;Ole R. Eigaard,&nbsp;Antonello Sala,&nbsp;Ciarán McLaverty,&nbsp;Callum M. Roberts,&nbsp;Brendan J. Godley,&nbsp;Kristian Metcalfe","doi":"10.1111/faf.12893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fishing with active bottom-contacting gears (here collectively described as 'bottom trawling') is considered the greatest source of anthropogenic disturbance to marine sediments. However, uncertainties are apparent in studies evaluating the severity of their impacts from fishing with these gears at the global scale. A major uncertainty is the estimation of the area of seabed disturbed by applying European-based vessel size to gear footprint (i.e., gear width) relationships to the global fleet, thereby assuming these relations hold worldwide. To test the strength of this assumption, we conducted a structured review to understand global variation in fishing gear parameters and, thus, footprint of bottom trawling gears. While we find a European bias in the primary literature, we find that the relationship between vessel size and gear footprint differs significantly among FAO Major Fishing Areas, suggesting that European-based relationships are not representative of fleets worldwide. For example, otter trawler footprints in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea increase by 10.2 m for every meter increase in overall vessel length compared to just 3.3 m for otter trawlers in the Northwest Atlantic. These findings challenge the reliability of previous estimates of the global footprint of bottom trawling gears, thus highlighting the urgent need for improved availability of commercial data to create a globally representative data set that can address uncertainties in the quantification of anthropogenic disturbance of the benthic environment and the consequential impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem integrity and carbon losses.</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"26 3","pages":"488-503"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12893","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional Variation in Active Bottom-Contacting Gear Footprints\",\"authors\":\"Mollie Rickwood,&nbsp;Chris Kerry,&nbsp;Ole R. Eigaard,&nbsp;Antonello Sala,&nbsp;Ciarán McLaverty,&nbsp;Callum M. Roberts,&nbsp;Brendan J. Godley,&nbsp;Kristian Metcalfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.12893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Fishing with active bottom-contacting gears (here collectively described as 'bottom trawling') is considered the greatest source of anthropogenic disturbance to marine sediments. However, uncertainties are apparent in studies evaluating the severity of their impacts from fishing with these gears at the global scale. A major uncertainty is the estimation of the area of seabed disturbed by applying European-based vessel size to gear footprint (i.e., gear width) relationships to the global fleet, thereby assuming these relations hold worldwide. To test the strength of this assumption, we conducted a structured review to understand global variation in fishing gear parameters and, thus, footprint of bottom trawling gears. While we find a European bias in the primary literature, we find that the relationship between vessel size and gear footprint differs significantly among FAO Major Fishing Areas, suggesting that European-based relationships are not representative of fleets worldwide. For example, otter trawler footprints in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea increase by 10.2 m for every meter increase in overall vessel length compared to just 3.3 m for otter trawlers in the Northwest Atlantic. These findings challenge the reliability of previous estimates of the global footprint of bottom trawling gears, thus highlighting the urgent need for improved availability of commercial data to create a globally representative data set that can address uncertainties in the quantification of anthropogenic disturbance of the benthic environment and the consequential impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem integrity and carbon losses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"488-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12893\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12893\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12893","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动触底渔具捕鱼(这里统称为“底拖网捕鱼”)被认为是人为干扰海洋沉积物的最大来源。然而,在评估全球范围内使用这些渔具捕鱼对其影响的严重程度的研究中,存在明显的不确定性。一个主要的不确定性是,通过将基于欧洲的船舶尺寸应用于全球船队的齿轮足迹(即齿轮宽度)关系,从而假设这些关系在全球范围内都成立,从而估计海床受到干扰的面积。为了验证这一假设的正确性,我们进行了一次结构化的回顾,以了解渔具参数的全球变化,从而了解底拖网渔具的足迹。虽然我们在主要文献中发现欧洲偏差,但我们发现船舶尺寸和渔具足迹之间的关系在粮农组织主要渔区之间存在显著差异,这表明以欧洲为基础的关系并不代表全球船队。例如,地中海和黑海的水獭拖网渔船的足迹每增加1米,就会增加10.2米,而西北大西洋的水獭拖网渔船的足迹仅为3.3米。这些发现对以往对海底拖网渔具全球足迹估计的可靠性提出了挑战,因此,迫切需要改善商业数据的可用性,以创建一个具有全球代表性的数据集,以解决量化底栖环境人为干扰及其对生物多样性、生态系统完整性和碳损失的影响中的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Regional Variation in Active Bottom-Contacting Gear Footprints

Regional Variation in Active Bottom-Contacting Gear Footprints

Fishing with active bottom-contacting gears (here collectively described as 'bottom trawling') is considered the greatest source of anthropogenic disturbance to marine sediments. However, uncertainties are apparent in studies evaluating the severity of their impacts from fishing with these gears at the global scale. A major uncertainty is the estimation of the area of seabed disturbed by applying European-based vessel size to gear footprint (i.e., gear width) relationships to the global fleet, thereby assuming these relations hold worldwide. To test the strength of this assumption, we conducted a structured review to understand global variation in fishing gear parameters and, thus, footprint of bottom trawling gears. While we find a European bias in the primary literature, we find that the relationship between vessel size and gear footprint differs significantly among FAO Major Fishing Areas, suggesting that European-based relationships are not representative of fleets worldwide. For example, otter trawler footprints in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea increase by 10.2 m for every meter increase in overall vessel length compared to just 3.3 m for otter trawlers in the Northwest Atlantic. These findings challenge the reliability of previous estimates of the global footprint of bottom trawling gears, thus highlighting the urgent need for improved availability of commercial data to create a globally representative data set that can address uncertainties in the quantification of anthropogenic disturbance of the benthic environment and the consequential impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem integrity and carbon losses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信