从高阶因子数据对生态偶然性进行排序,证明了新西兰南岛河口的简化级联对生物多样性的整齐控制

IF 4.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07488
Ken Joseph E. Clemente, Mads S. Thomsen
{"title":"从高阶因子数据对生态偶然性进行排序,证明了新西兰南岛河口的简化级联对生物多样性的整齐控制","authors":"Ken Joseph E. Clemente,&nbsp;Mads S. Thomsen","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Community ecology has been described as a ‘mess' because ecological processes vary in space, time, and across species traits, resulting in myriads of ecological contingencies and low scientific predictability. Here, we aimed to identify and rank ecological contingencies and improve predictability using fully crossed high-order factorial mensurative and manipulative experiments across axes of spatiotemporal variability that may influence the strength of facilitation cascades on the South Island of New Zealand. Facilitation cascades, arising from chains of positive interactions, are prevalent in intertidal sedimentary estuaries, where biogenic habitat-formers, such as bivalves and attached seaweed, provide hard substrates, food, hiding places, and reduce environmental stress for small animals. Specifically, we measured facilitation of &gt; 65 000 small mobile invertebrates across eight archetypical contingencies, i.e. within and between seasons, latitudes, sites with different distances to the open ocean, vertical intertidal elevations, wider habitat matrix (bare sediment vs seagrass beds), and between small-scale habitat-forming species (the endemic cockle <i>Austrovenus</i> and attached cosmopolitan seaweeds, <i>Ulva</i> and <i>Gracilaria</i> spp.) and their sizes. Overall, our multifactorial tests revealed that most higher-order interactions (three-way or more) were not important ecologically and that many important lower-order interactions (two-way) were ‘simple', demonstrating that facilitation can increase when and where the baseline biodiversity is higher. Furthermore, most of the main test factors were significant and ecologically important, suggesting that facilitation of animals, generally and across other factors, was strongest on large and morphologically complex seaweeds, at near-ocean sites and deeper intertidal elevations, and in warmer summer months. Our case study highlights a relatively tidy – not messy – control of biodiversity of intertidal epifauna, and that high-order factorial sampling can help unravel and rank co-occurring spatiotemporal drivers to better understand ecological contingencies. Finally, our results may also inform management of habitat-forming species to preserve estuarine biodiversity and maintain their secondary production.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07488","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking ecological contingencies from high-order factorial data demonstrate tidy control of biodiversity from facilitation cascades in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Ken Joseph E. Clemente,&nbsp;Mads S. Thomsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecog.07488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Community ecology has been described as a ‘mess' because ecological processes vary in space, time, and across species traits, resulting in myriads of ecological contingencies and low scientific predictability. Here, we aimed to identify and rank ecological contingencies and improve predictability using fully crossed high-order factorial mensurative and manipulative experiments across axes of spatiotemporal variability that may influence the strength of facilitation cascades on the South Island of New Zealand. Facilitation cascades, arising from chains of positive interactions, are prevalent in intertidal sedimentary estuaries, where biogenic habitat-formers, such as bivalves and attached seaweed, provide hard substrates, food, hiding places, and reduce environmental stress for small animals. Specifically, we measured facilitation of &gt; 65 000 small mobile invertebrates across eight archetypical contingencies, i.e. within and between seasons, latitudes, sites with different distances to the open ocean, vertical intertidal elevations, wider habitat matrix (bare sediment vs seagrass beds), and between small-scale habitat-forming species (the endemic cockle <i>Austrovenus</i> and attached cosmopolitan seaweeds, <i>Ulva</i> and <i>Gracilaria</i> spp.) and their sizes. Overall, our multifactorial tests revealed that most higher-order interactions (three-way or more) were not important ecologically and that many important lower-order interactions (two-way) were ‘simple', demonstrating that facilitation can increase when and where the baseline biodiversity is higher. Furthermore, most of the main test factors were significant and ecologically important, suggesting that facilitation of animals, generally and across other factors, was strongest on large and morphologically complex seaweeds, at near-ocean sites and deeper intertidal elevations, and in warmer summer months. Our case study highlights a relatively tidy – not messy – control of biodiversity of intertidal epifauna, and that high-order factorial sampling can help unravel and rank co-occurring spatiotemporal drivers to better understand ecological contingencies. Finally, our results may also inform management of habitat-forming species to preserve estuarine biodiversity and maintain their secondary production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"2025 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07488\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07488\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07488","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

群落生态学被描述为“混乱”,因为生态过程在空间、时间和物种特征上都是不同的,导致无数的生态偶然性和低科学可预测性。在这里,我们旨在通过跨时空变异性轴的全交叉高阶因子测量和操作实验来识别和排序生态突发事件,并提高可预测性,这些事件可能会影响新西兰南岛促进级联的强度。在潮间带沉积河口中,由积极相互作用链产生的促进级联很普遍,那里的生物栖息地形成者,如双壳类和附着的海藻,提供了坚硬的基质、食物、藏身之处,并减少了小动物的环境压力。具体来说,我们测量了>;在8个典型偶发事件中,即季节内和季节之间,纬度,与开放海洋距离不同的地点,垂直潮间带海拔,更宽的栖息地基质(裸沉积物与海草床),以及小型栖息地形成物种(特有的Austrovenus蛤和附生的世界性海藻,Ulva和Gracilaria spp.)及其大小之间,共有65000只小型移动无脊椎动物。总体而言,我们的多因素测试显示,大多数高阶相互作用(三方或更多)在生态学上并不重要,而许多重要的低阶相互作用(双向)是“简单的”,这表明当基线生物多样性较高时,促进作用可以增加。此外,大多数主要测试因子具有显著性和生态重要性,表明动物的促进作用在大型和形态复杂的海藻、近海地点和较深的潮间带海拔以及较温暖的夏季最强。我们的案例研究强调了对潮间带浅层动物生物多样性的相对整洁(而不是混乱)的控制,并且高阶因子抽样可以帮助揭示和排序共同发生的时空驱动因素,以更好地理解生态突发事件。最后,我们的研究结果也可以为生境形成物种的管理提供参考,以保护河口生物多样性和维持其次生生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ranking ecological contingencies from high-order factorial data demonstrate tidy control of biodiversity from facilitation cascades in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand

Ranking ecological contingencies from high-order factorial data demonstrate tidy control of biodiversity from facilitation cascades in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand

Ranking ecological contingencies from high-order factorial data demonstrate tidy control of biodiversity from facilitation cascades in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand

Ranking ecological contingencies from high-order factorial data demonstrate tidy control of biodiversity from facilitation cascades in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand

Community ecology has been described as a ‘mess' because ecological processes vary in space, time, and across species traits, resulting in myriads of ecological contingencies and low scientific predictability. Here, we aimed to identify and rank ecological contingencies and improve predictability using fully crossed high-order factorial mensurative and manipulative experiments across axes of spatiotemporal variability that may influence the strength of facilitation cascades on the South Island of New Zealand. Facilitation cascades, arising from chains of positive interactions, are prevalent in intertidal sedimentary estuaries, where biogenic habitat-formers, such as bivalves and attached seaweed, provide hard substrates, food, hiding places, and reduce environmental stress for small animals. Specifically, we measured facilitation of > 65 000 small mobile invertebrates across eight archetypical contingencies, i.e. within and between seasons, latitudes, sites with different distances to the open ocean, vertical intertidal elevations, wider habitat matrix (bare sediment vs seagrass beds), and between small-scale habitat-forming species (the endemic cockle Austrovenus and attached cosmopolitan seaweeds, Ulva and Gracilaria spp.) and their sizes. Overall, our multifactorial tests revealed that most higher-order interactions (three-way or more) were not important ecologically and that many important lower-order interactions (two-way) were ‘simple', demonstrating that facilitation can increase when and where the baseline biodiversity is higher. Furthermore, most of the main test factors were significant and ecologically important, suggesting that facilitation of animals, generally and across other factors, was strongest on large and morphologically complex seaweeds, at near-ocean sites and deeper intertidal elevations, and in warmer summer months. Our case study highlights a relatively tidy – not messy – control of biodiversity of intertidal epifauna, and that high-order factorial sampling can help unravel and rank co-occurring spatiotemporal drivers to better understand ecological contingencies. Finally, our results may also inform management of habitat-forming species to preserve estuarine biodiversity and maintain their secondary production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信