评估全基因组测序方案检测抗菌素耐药性,毒力因子和抗菌素耐药细菌的移动遗传元件。

Gabriel Cipriani, Karin Helmersen, Ricardo Ruiz Mazzon, Glauber Wagner, Hege Vangstein Aamot, Fabienne Antunes Ferreira
{"title":"评估全基因组测序方案检测抗菌素耐药性,毒力因子和抗菌素耐药细菌的移动遗传元件。","authors":"Gabriel Cipriani, Karin Helmersen, Ricardo Ruiz Mazzon, Glauber Wagner, Hege Vangstein Aamot, Fabienne Antunes Ferreira","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical threat to global health, underscoring the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tools. Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (ESBL-Kp) are listed among the World Health Organization's priority pathogens.<b>Hypothesis.</b> A rapid nanopore-based protocol can accurately and efficiently detect AMR genes, virulence factors (VFs) and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) in MRSA and ESBL-Kp, offering performance comparable to or superior to traditional sequencing methods.<b>Aim.</b> Evaluate whole-genome sequencing (WGS) protocols for detecting AMR genes, VFs and MGEs in MRSA and ESBL-Kp, to identify the most accurate and efficient tool for pathogen profiling.<b>Methodology.</b> Five distinct WGS protocols, including a rapid nanopore-based protocol (ONT20h) and four slower sequencing methods, were evaluated for their effectiveness in detecting genetic markers. The protocols' performances were compared across AMR genes, VFs and MGEs. Additionally, phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed to assess concordance with the genomic findings.<b>Results.</b> Compared to four slower sequencing protocols, the rapid nanopore-based protocol (ONT20h) demonstrated comparable or superior performance in AMR gene detection and equivalent VF identification. Although MGE detection varied among protocols, ONT20h showed a high level of agreement with phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing.<b>Conclusion.</b> The findings highlight the potential of rapid WGS as a valuable tool for clinical microbiology, enabling timely implementation of infection control measures and informed therapeutic decisions. However, further studies are required to optimize the clinical application of this technology, considering costs, availability of bioinformatics tools and quality of reference databases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of whole-genome sequencing protocols for detection of antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors and mobile genetic elements in antimicrobial-resistant bacteria.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Cipriani, Karin Helmersen, Ricardo Ruiz Mazzon, Glauber Wagner, Hege Vangstein Aamot, Fabienne Antunes Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmm.0.001990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical threat to global health, underscoring the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tools. Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (ESBL-Kp) are listed among the World Health Organization's priority pathogens.<b>Hypothesis.</b> A rapid nanopore-based protocol can accurately and efficiently detect AMR genes, virulence factors (VFs) and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) in MRSA and ESBL-Kp, offering performance comparable to or superior to traditional sequencing methods.<b>Aim.</b> Evaluate whole-genome sequencing (WGS) protocols for detecting AMR genes, VFs and MGEs in MRSA and ESBL-Kp, to identify the most accurate and efficient tool for pathogen profiling.<b>Methodology.</b> Five distinct WGS protocols, including a rapid nanopore-based protocol (ONT20h) and four slower sequencing methods, were evaluated for their effectiveness in detecting genetic markers. The protocols' performances were compared across AMR genes, VFs and MGEs. Additionally, phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed to assess concordance with the genomic findings.<b>Results.</b> Compared to four slower sequencing protocols, the rapid nanopore-based protocol (ONT20h) demonstrated comparable or superior performance in AMR gene detection and equivalent VF identification. Although MGE detection varied among protocols, ONT20h showed a high level of agreement with phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing.<b>Conclusion.</b> The findings highlight the potential of rapid WGS as a valuable tool for clinical microbiology, enabling timely implementation of infection control measures and informed therapeutic decisions. However, further studies are required to optimize the clinical application of this technology, considering costs, availability of bioinformatics tools and quality of reference databases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"74 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。抗菌素耐药性(AMR)对全球健康构成严重威胁,强调需要快速和准确的诊断工具。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和产生广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)的肺炎克雷伯菌(ESBL- kp)被列为世界卫生组织的优先病原体。基于纳米孔的快速检测方案能够准确、高效地检测MRSA和ESBL-Kp中的AMR基因、毒力因子(VFs)和移动遗传元件(MGEs),其性能可与传统测序方法相媲美或优于传统测序方法。评估检测MRSA和ESBL-Kp中AMR基因、VFs和MGEs的全基因组测序(WGS)方案,以确定最准确和有效的病原体分析工具。五种不同的WGS方案,包括基于纳米孔的快速方案(ONT20h)和四种较慢的测序方法,评估了它们在检测遗传标记方面的有效性。在AMR基因、VFs和MGEs之间比较了协议的性能。此外,还进行了表型抗菌药物敏感性试验,以评估与基因组研究结果的一致性。与四种较慢的测序方案相比,基于纳米孔的快速测序方案(ONT20h)在AMR基因检测和等效VF鉴定方面表现出相当或更好的性能。虽然不同方案的MGE检测结果不同,但ONT20h与表型药敏试验结果高度一致。这些发现强调了快速WGS作为临床微生物学的一种有价值的工具的潜力,能够及时实施感染控制措施和知情的治疗决策。然而,考虑到成本、生物信息学工具的可用性和参考数据库的质量,需要进一步的研究来优化该技术的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of whole-genome sequencing protocols for detection of antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors and mobile genetic elements in antimicrobial-resistant bacteria.

Introduction. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical threat to global health, underscoring the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tools. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-Kp) are listed among the World Health Organization's priority pathogens.Hypothesis. A rapid nanopore-based protocol can accurately and efficiently detect AMR genes, virulence factors (VFs) and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) in MRSA and ESBL-Kp, offering performance comparable to or superior to traditional sequencing methods.Aim. Evaluate whole-genome sequencing (WGS) protocols for detecting AMR genes, VFs and MGEs in MRSA and ESBL-Kp, to identify the most accurate and efficient tool for pathogen profiling.Methodology. Five distinct WGS protocols, including a rapid nanopore-based protocol (ONT20h) and four slower sequencing methods, were evaluated for their effectiveness in detecting genetic markers. The protocols' performances were compared across AMR genes, VFs and MGEs. Additionally, phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed to assess concordance with the genomic findings.Results. Compared to four slower sequencing protocols, the rapid nanopore-based protocol (ONT20h) demonstrated comparable or superior performance in AMR gene detection and equivalent VF identification. Although MGE detection varied among protocols, ONT20h showed a high level of agreement with phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Conclusion. The findings highlight the potential of rapid WGS as a valuable tool for clinical microbiology, enabling timely implementation of infection control measures and informed therapeutic decisions. However, further studies are required to optimize the clinical application of this technology, considering costs, availability of bioinformatics tools and quality of reference databases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信