多物种关系决定了鸟类的喂养方式。

Tuomas Aivelo, Mikko Aulio, Johanna Enström, Purabi Deshpande, Anna Haukka, Heta Lähdesmäki, Katja Rönkä, Andrea Santangeli, Virpi Väkkärä, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Rose Thorogood, Anttoni Kervinen
{"title":"多物种关系决定了鸟类的喂养方式。","authors":"Tuomas Aivelo, Mikko Aulio, Johanna Enström, Purabi Deshpande, Anna Haukka, Heta Lähdesmäki, Katja Rönkä, Andrea Santangeli, Virpi Väkkärä, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Rose Thorogood, Anttoni Kervinen","doi":"10.1038/s44185-025-00080-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While humans often feed birds in their backyards, there is a growing awareness that this has positive and negative effects on local biodiversity. Whether the observed species assemblage shapes human activities has, however, rarely been investigated. We analyzed 15,088 open-ended answers from 9473 Finnish respondents about why they have increased or reduced feeding birds. They mentioned 58 avian and non-avian species linked to changed practices. The main reasons for change were (1) respondent's relation to nonhuman species, (2) respondent's relation to other humans, and (3) relations between nonhuman species. Most taxa and reasons could lead to both increase or decrease in feeding, although the direction was context-dependent. We suggest that bird-feeding is an interactive process where the species community strongly affects feeding practices, which in turn can affect community composition. Recognizing this process is crucial for understanding the effects of bird-feeding on both humans and nature and providing more nuanced guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":520249,"journal":{"name":"npj biodiversity","volume":"4 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multispecies relations shape bird-feeding practices.\",\"authors\":\"Tuomas Aivelo, Mikko Aulio, Johanna Enström, Purabi Deshpande, Anna Haukka, Heta Lähdesmäki, Katja Rönkä, Andrea Santangeli, Virpi Väkkärä, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Rose Thorogood, Anttoni Kervinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44185-025-00080-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While humans often feed birds in their backyards, there is a growing awareness that this has positive and negative effects on local biodiversity. Whether the observed species assemblage shapes human activities has, however, rarely been investigated. We analyzed 15,088 open-ended answers from 9473 Finnish respondents about why they have increased or reduced feeding birds. They mentioned 58 avian and non-avian species linked to changed practices. The main reasons for change were (1) respondent's relation to nonhuman species, (2) respondent's relation to other humans, and (3) relations between nonhuman species. Most taxa and reasons could lead to both increase or decrease in feeding, although the direction was context-dependent. We suggest that bird-feeding is an interactive process where the species community strongly affects feeding practices, which in turn can affect community composition. Recognizing this process is crucial for understanding the effects of bird-feeding on both humans and nature and providing more nuanced guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj biodiversity\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj biodiversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44185-025-00080-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44185-025-00080-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然人类经常在后院喂鸟,但人们越来越意识到这对当地生物多样性有积极和消极的影响。然而,观察到的物种组合是否会影响人类活动,很少有人进行调查。我们分析了9473名芬兰受访者的15088个开放式答案,内容是他们为什么增加或减少喂鸟。他们提到了58种与改变做法有关的鸟类和非鸟类物种。变化的主要原因是(1)被调查者与非人类物种的关系,(2)被调查者与其他人类的关系,(3)非人类物种之间的关系。大多数种类和原因都可能导致取食增加或减少,但方向与环境有关。我们认为鸟类取食是一个相互作用的过程,物种群落强烈影响取食行为,而取食行为反过来又影响群落组成。认识到这一过程对于理解鸟类喂养对人类和自然的影响以及提供更细致的指导至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multispecies relations shape bird-feeding practices.

Multispecies relations shape bird-feeding practices.

While humans often feed birds in their backyards, there is a growing awareness that this has positive and negative effects on local biodiversity. Whether the observed species assemblage shapes human activities has, however, rarely been investigated. We analyzed 15,088 open-ended answers from 9473 Finnish respondents about why they have increased or reduced feeding birds. They mentioned 58 avian and non-avian species linked to changed practices. The main reasons for change were (1) respondent's relation to nonhuman species, (2) respondent's relation to other humans, and (3) relations between nonhuman species. Most taxa and reasons could lead to both increase or decrease in feeding, although the direction was context-dependent. We suggest that bird-feeding is an interactive process where the species community strongly affects feeding practices, which in turn can affect community composition. Recognizing this process is crucial for understanding the effects of bird-feeding on both humans and nature and providing more nuanced guidance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信