“我觉得我的权利被侵犯了”:乌干达东部停止使用依赖提供者的避孕方法所面临的挑战。

IF 1.9 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Agnes Nabulondera, Madeline Powers, Rose Chalo Nabirye, Sarah Racheal Akello, Munanura Turyasiima, Joshua Epuitai
{"title":"“我觉得我的权利被侵犯了”:乌干达东部停止使用依赖提供者的避孕方法所面临的挑战。","authors":"Agnes Nabulondera, Madeline Powers, Rose Chalo Nabirye, Sarah Racheal Akello, Munanura Turyasiima, Joshua Epuitai","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00354-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The right to autonomy in family planning is a cornerstone of reproductive health. Yet, many women face challenges when seeking to discontinue provider-dependent contraceptive methods, such as implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs). This study explored the experiences of women in Eastern Uganda regarding the discontinuation of implants/IUDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted 15 in-depth interviews with women and six key informant interviews with healthcare providers. The study obtained ethical clearance and used a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two themes were identified: (1) reasons for refusal and (2) women's reactions to refusal to discontinue IUDs/implants. Women were denied to discontinue IUDs/implants because the due date had not been reached, insertion cards were missing, and there were healthcare constraints, especially inadequate equipment. Early removal or discontinuation before the due date was considered as a waste of resources, unjustifiable, and it was seen to increase risk of pregnancy among young girls. Healthcare workers preferred to first counsel for side effects instead of heeding women's requests to discontinue IUDs/implants. Women often felt betrayed and powerless when they were denied to discontinue using IUDs/implants. They felt that their reproductive rights were undermined which fostered mistrust towards future use of provider-dependent contraceptives. Women reported physical, social, and mental health struggles including strained marital relationships following denial to discontinue IUDs/implants. Most of the women incurred costs in discontinuing the use of IUDs/implants in private facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the need to uphold women's autonomy by improving access to removal services, and addressing systemic and provider-level barriers to discontinuation of IUDs/implants. Insertion cards should not be a mandatory requirement during discontinuation of contraceptives, while enhancing record-keeping systems can address the need for insertion cards. Respecting women's rights to discontinue contraceptives is essential for ensuring voluntary and sustained family planning use.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"I felt my rights were violated\\\": Challenges with the discontinuation of provider-dependent contraceptive methods in Eastern Uganda.\",\"authors\":\"Agnes Nabulondera, Madeline Powers, Rose Chalo Nabirye, Sarah Racheal Akello, Munanura Turyasiima, Joshua Epuitai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40834-025-00354-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The right to autonomy in family planning is a cornerstone of reproductive health. Yet, many women face challenges when seeking to discontinue provider-dependent contraceptive methods, such as implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs). This study explored the experiences of women in Eastern Uganda regarding the discontinuation of implants/IUDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted 15 in-depth interviews with women and six key informant interviews with healthcare providers. The study obtained ethical clearance and used a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two themes were identified: (1) reasons for refusal and (2) women's reactions to refusal to discontinue IUDs/implants. Women were denied to discontinue IUDs/implants because the due date had not been reached, insertion cards were missing, and there were healthcare constraints, especially inadequate equipment. Early removal or discontinuation before the due date was considered as a waste of resources, unjustifiable, and it was seen to increase risk of pregnancy among young girls. Healthcare workers preferred to first counsel for side effects instead of heeding women's requests to discontinue IUDs/implants. Women often felt betrayed and powerless when they were denied to discontinue using IUDs/implants. They felt that their reproductive rights were undermined which fostered mistrust towards future use of provider-dependent contraceptives. Women reported physical, social, and mental health struggles including strained marital relationships following denial to discontinue IUDs/implants. Most of the women incurred costs in discontinuing the use of IUDs/implants in private facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the need to uphold women's autonomy by improving access to removal services, and addressing systemic and provider-level barriers to discontinuation of IUDs/implants. Insertion cards should not be a mandatory requirement during discontinuation of contraceptives, while enhancing record-keeping systems can address the need for insertion cards. Respecting women's rights to discontinue contraceptives is essential for ensuring voluntary and sustained family planning use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception and reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception and reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00354-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00354-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:计划生育自主权是生殖健康的基石。然而,许多妇女在寻求停止依赖提供者的避孕方法时面临挑战,例如植入物和宫内节育器(iud)。这项研究探讨了乌干达东部妇女关于停止植入物/宫内节育器的经历。方法:采用定性描述设计,我们对妇女进行了15次深度访谈,并对医疗保健提供者进行了6次关键信息访谈。该研究获得了伦理许可,并采用了专题分析。结果:确定了两个主题:(1)拒绝原因和(2)女性对拒绝停止宫内节育器/植入物的反应。妇女被拒绝停止宫内节育器/植入物,因为未到预产期,插入卡丢失,保健方面存在限制,特别是设备不足。在预产期之前提前终止妊娠或中止妊娠被认为是浪费资源,是不合理的,而且被认为会增加年轻女孩怀孕的风险。医护人员更倾向于首先咨询副作用,而不是听从妇女要求停止使用宫内节育器/植入物。当妇女被拒绝停止使用宫内节育器/植入物时,她们常常感到被背叛和无能为力。她们认为她们的生殖权利受到了损害,这使她们对今后使用依赖提供者的避孕药具产生了不信任。妇女报告了身体、社会和精神健康方面的挣扎,包括拒绝停止宫内节育器/植入物后婚姻关系紧张。大多数妇女因在私人设施停止使用宫内节育器/植入物而支付费用。结论:研究结果强调了维护妇女自主权的必要性,通过改善获得摘除服务的机会,解决系统和提供者层面的宫内节育器/植入物停止的障碍。插入卡不应成为停止避孕期间的强制性要求,而加强记录保存系统可以解决插入卡的需求。尊重妇女停止使用避孕药具的权利对于确保自愿和持续使用计划生育至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"I felt my rights were violated": Challenges with the discontinuation of provider-dependent contraceptive methods in Eastern Uganda.

Background: The right to autonomy in family planning is a cornerstone of reproductive health. Yet, many women face challenges when seeking to discontinue provider-dependent contraceptive methods, such as implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs). This study explored the experiences of women in Eastern Uganda regarding the discontinuation of implants/IUDs.

Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted 15 in-depth interviews with women and six key informant interviews with healthcare providers. The study obtained ethical clearance and used a thematic analysis.

Results: Two themes were identified: (1) reasons for refusal and (2) women's reactions to refusal to discontinue IUDs/implants. Women were denied to discontinue IUDs/implants because the due date had not been reached, insertion cards were missing, and there were healthcare constraints, especially inadequate equipment. Early removal or discontinuation before the due date was considered as a waste of resources, unjustifiable, and it was seen to increase risk of pregnancy among young girls. Healthcare workers preferred to first counsel for side effects instead of heeding women's requests to discontinue IUDs/implants. Women often felt betrayed and powerless when they were denied to discontinue using IUDs/implants. They felt that their reproductive rights were undermined which fostered mistrust towards future use of provider-dependent contraceptives. Women reported physical, social, and mental health struggles including strained marital relationships following denial to discontinue IUDs/implants. Most of the women incurred costs in discontinuing the use of IUDs/implants in private facilities.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the need to uphold women's autonomy by improving access to removal services, and addressing systemic and provider-level barriers to discontinuation of IUDs/implants. Insertion cards should not be a mandatory requirement during discontinuation of contraceptives, while enhancing record-keeping systems can address the need for insertion cards. Respecting women's rights to discontinue contraceptives is essential for ensuring voluntary and sustained family planning use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信