Ildiko Lingvay, Julie Krogsdahl Bache, Cyrus V Desouza, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Andrea Navarria, Shehla S Shaikh, André G D Vianna
{"title":"在人口统计学亚组中,每周一次胰岛素Icodec与每天一次比较者的疗效和低血糖状况。","authors":"Ildiko Lingvay, Julie Krogsdahl Bache, Cyrus V Desouza, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Andrea Navarria, Shehla S Shaikh, André G D Vianna","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This post hoc analysis evaluated the impact of age, ethnicity, and race on efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes with once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) vs once-daily (OD) basal insulin comparators, leveraging data from the ONWARDS 1 to 5 phase 3a clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes were assessed within each trial in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3, and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes across subgroups of age (<55, 55-64, and ≥65 years), ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino), and race (Asian, Black/African American, White, Other). The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to planned end of treatment. Other outcomes assessed included the achievement of HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia and the number of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemic episodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all trials, the estimated treatment differences for change in HbA1c and the odds ratios for achieving HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were similar across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups with icodec vs OD insulin (no statistically significant treatment by subgroup interactions were observed; P > .05 in all instances). Hypoglycemia rates were numerically low for both treatment groups and consistent across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy and hypoglycemia profile of icodec vs OD comparators was consistent across trial populations irrespective of age, ethnicity, or race.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e3596-e3606"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Hypoglycemia Profile of Once-weekly Insulin Icodec vs Once-daily Comparators Across Demographic Subgroups.\",\"authors\":\"Ildiko Lingvay, Julie Krogsdahl Bache, Cyrus V Desouza, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Andrea Navarria, Shehla S Shaikh, André G D Vianna\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgaf168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This post hoc analysis evaluated the impact of age, ethnicity, and race on efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes with once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) vs once-daily (OD) basal insulin comparators, leveraging data from the ONWARDS 1 to 5 phase 3a clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes were assessed within each trial in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3, and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes across subgroups of age (<55, 55-64, and ≥65 years), ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino), and race (Asian, Black/African American, White, Other). The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to planned end of treatment. Other outcomes assessed included the achievement of HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia and the number of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemic episodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all trials, the estimated treatment differences for change in HbA1c and the odds ratios for achieving HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were similar across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups with icodec vs OD insulin (no statistically significant treatment by subgroup interactions were observed; P > .05 in all instances). Hypoglycemia rates were numerically low for both treatment groups and consistent across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy and hypoglycemia profile of icodec vs OD comparators was consistent across trial populations irrespective of age, ethnicity, or race.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e3596-e3606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and Hypoglycemia Profile of Once-weekly Insulin Icodec vs Once-daily Comparators Across Demographic Subgroups.
Objective: This post hoc analysis evaluated the impact of age, ethnicity, and race on efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes with once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) vs once-daily (OD) basal insulin comparators, leveraging data from the ONWARDS 1 to 5 phase 3a clinical trials.
Methods: Efficacy and hypoglycemia outcomes were assessed within each trial in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3, and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes across subgroups of age (<55, 55-64, and ≥65 years), ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino), and race (Asian, Black/African American, White, Other). The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to planned end of treatment. Other outcomes assessed included the achievement of HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia and the number of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemic episodes.
Results: Across all trials, the estimated treatment differences for change in HbA1c and the odds ratios for achieving HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were similar across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups with icodec vs OD insulin (no statistically significant treatment by subgroup interactions were observed; P > .05 in all instances). Hypoglycemia rates were numerically low for both treatment groups and consistent across age, ethnicity, and race subgroups.
Conclusion: The efficacy and hypoglycemia profile of icodec vs OD comparators was consistent across trial populations irrespective of age, ethnicity, or race.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.