范围审查:校本团体心理健康干预的潜在危害。

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Carolina Guzman-Holst, Rowan Streckfuss Davis, Jack L Andrews, Lucy Foulkes
{"title":"范围审查:校本团体心理健康干预的潜在危害。","authors":"Carolina Guzman-Holst, Rowan Streckfuss Davis, Jack L Andrews, Lucy Foulkes","doi":"10.1111/camh.12760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A growing body of evidence demonstrates that school-based mental health interventions may be potentially harmful. We define potential harm as any negative outcome or adverse event that could plausibly be linked to an intervention. In this scoping review, we examine three areas: the types of potential harms and adverse events reported in school-based mental health interventions; the subgroups of children and adolescents at heightened risk; and the proposed explanations for these potential harms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched eight databases (1960-2023), performed an author search and hand-searched for published and unpublished studies that evaluated controlled trials of school-based group mental health interventions based on cognitive-behavioural therapy and/or mindfulness techniques, with the aim of reducing or preventing internalising symptoms or increasing wellbeing. Two independent raters screened studies for eligibility and assessed study quality using Cochrane tools. From eligible studies, we reviewed those that reported at least one negative outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten out of 112 (8.93%) interventions (described in 120 studies) reported at least one negative outcome such as a decrease in wellbeing or an increase in depression or anxiety. Three out of 112 interventions (2.68%) reported the occurrence of specific adverse events, none of which were linked to the intervention. Of the 15/120 studies rated as high quality (i.e. those with low risk of bias), 5/15 (33.33%) reported at least one negative outcome. Negative outcomes were found for a number of subgroups including individuals deemed at high risk of mental health problems, male participants, younger children and children eligible for free school meals. About half (54.5%) of the studies acknowledged that the content of the intervention itself might have led to the negative outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To design and implement effective school-based mental health interventions, the issues of potential harm and their related measurement and reporting challenges must be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping review: potential harm from school-based group mental health interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Guzman-Holst, Rowan Streckfuss Davis, Jack L Andrews, Lucy Foulkes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/camh.12760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A growing body of evidence demonstrates that school-based mental health interventions may be potentially harmful. We define potential harm as any negative outcome or adverse event that could plausibly be linked to an intervention. In this scoping review, we examine three areas: the types of potential harms and adverse events reported in school-based mental health interventions; the subgroups of children and adolescents at heightened risk; and the proposed explanations for these potential harms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched eight databases (1960-2023), performed an author search and hand-searched for published and unpublished studies that evaluated controlled trials of school-based group mental health interventions based on cognitive-behavioural therapy and/or mindfulness techniques, with the aim of reducing or preventing internalising symptoms or increasing wellbeing. Two independent raters screened studies for eligibility and assessed study quality using Cochrane tools. From eligible studies, we reviewed those that reported at least one negative outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten out of 112 (8.93%) interventions (described in 120 studies) reported at least one negative outcome such as a decrease in wellbeing or an increase in depression or anxiety. Three out of 112 interventions (2.68%) reported the occurrence of specific adverse events, none of which were linked to the intervention. Of the 15/120 studies rated as high quality (i.e. those with low risk of bias), 5/15 (33.33%) reported at least one negative outcome. Negative outcomes were found for a number of subgroups including individuals deemed at high risk of mental health problems, male participants, younger children and children eligible for free school meals. About half (54.5%) of the studies acknowledged that the content of the intervention itself might have led to the negative outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To design and implement effective school-based mental health interventions, the issues of potential harm and their related measurement and reporting challenges must be addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child and Adolescent Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child and Adolescent Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12760\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的证据表明,以学校为基础的心理健康干预可能具有潜在的危害。我们将潜在危害定义为任何可能与干预有关的负面结果或不良事件。在这一范围综述中,我们研究了三个领域:学校心理健康干预中报告的潜在危害和不良事件的类型;高危儿童和青少年亚群体;以及对这些潜在危害的解释。方法:我们检索了8个数据库(1960-2023),进行了作者检索和手工检索已发表和未发表的研究,这些研究评估了基于认知行为疗法和/或正念技术的基于学校的群体心理健康干预的对照试验,目的是减少或预防内化症状或增加幸福感。两名独立评审员使用Cochrane工具筛选研究的合格性和评估研究质量。从符合条件的研究中,我们回顾了那些报告了至少一个负面结果的研究。结果:112项干预措施中有10项(8.93%)(在120项研究中描述)报告了至少一项负面结果,如幸福感下降或抑郁或焦虑增加。112项干预措施中有3项(2.68%)报告了特定不良事件的发生,这些不良事件均与干预措施无关。在被评为高质量(即低偏倚风险)的15/120项研究中,5/15(33.33%)报告了至少一个负面结果。在一些亚组中发现了负面结果,包括被认为有精神健康问题高风险的个人、男性参与者、年幼的儿童和有资格享受免费校餐的儿童。大约一半(54.5%)的研究承认干预本身的内容可能导致了负面结果。结论:为了设计和实施有效的校本心理健康干预措施,必须解决潜在危害问题及其相关的测量和报告挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scoping review: potential harm from school-based group mental health interventions.

Background: A growing body of evidence demonstrates that school-based mental health interventions may be potentially harmful. We define potential harm as any negative outcome or adverse event that could plausibly be linked to an intervention. In this scoping review, we examine three areas: the types of potential harms and adverse events reported in school-based mental health interventions; the subgroups of children and adolescents at heightened risk; and the proposed explanations for these potential harms.

Methods: We searched eight databases (1960-2023), performed an author search and hand-searched for published and unpublished studies that evaluated controlled trials of school-based group mental health interventions based on cognitive-behavioural therapy and/or mindfulness techniques, with the aim of reducing or preventing internalising symptoms or increasing wellbeing. Two independent raters screened studies for eligibility and assessed study quality using Cochrane tools. From eligible studies, we reviewed those that reported at least one negative outcome.

Results: Ten out of 112 (8.93%) interventions (described in 120 studies) reported at least one negative outcome such as a decrease in wellbeing or an increase in depression or anxiety. Three out of 112 interventions (2.68%) reported the occurrence of specific adverse events, none of which were linked to the intervention. Of the 15/120 studies rated as high quality (i.e. those with low risk of bias), 5/15 (33.33%) reported at least one negative outcome. Negative outcomes were found for a number of subgroups including individuals deemed at high risk of mental health problems, male participants, younger children and children eligible for free school meals. About half (54.5%) of the studies acknowledged that the content of the intervention itself might have led to the negative outcome.

Conclusion: To design and implement effective school-based mental health interventions, the issues of potential harm and their related measurement and reporting challenges must be addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Mental Health PEDIATRICS-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) publishes high quality, peer-reviewed child and adolescent mental health services research of relevance to academics, clinicians and commissioners internationally. The journal''s principal aim is to foster evidence-based clinical practice and clinically orientated research among clinicians and health services researchers working with children and adolescents, parents and their families in relation to or with a particular interest in mental health. CAMH publishes reviews, original articles, and pilot reports of innovative approaches, interventions, clinical methods and service developments. The journal has regular sections on Measurement Issues, Innovations in Practice, Global Child Mental Health and Humanities. All published papers should be of direct relevance to mental health practitioners and clearly draw out clinical implications for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信