基于RapidArc治疗递送剂量-体积直方图的患者特异性质量保证的综合位点特异性分析。

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5603/rpor.103529
Sumanta Manna, Benoy Kumar Singh, K J Maria Das
{"title":"基于RapidArc治疗递送剂量-体积直方图的患者特异性质量保证的综合位点特异性分析。","authors":"Sumanta Manna, Benoy Kumar Singh, K J Maria Das","doi":"10.5603/rpor.103529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current study aims to evaluate the use of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics as part of a comprehensive pre-treatment quality assurance (PSQA) protocol for RapidArc treatment delivery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of ninety patients were included in this study, with the patient population divided into four groups: Brain (n = 15), Head and Neck (H & N) (n = 30), Thorax (n = 15), and Pelvis (n = 30) RapidArc plans. The delivered dose was assessed using the Octavius 4D 1500 detector array and the Verisoft DVH application, focusing on DVH-related errors pertaining to targets and organ-at-risk (OARs). Additionally, three-dimensional local and global gamma passing rates were analyzed in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes using various gamma criteria, including 3 mm/3%, 3 mm/2%, 2 mm/3%, and 2 mm/2%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All treatment plans met the action level requirement, achieving a gamma acceptance rate exceeding 95% with a 3%/3 mm criterion. Among the anatomical planes, the transverse plane consistently exhibited the highest passing rates for various global gamma criteria across all treatment sites. Local gamma analysis revealed that the coronal plane had the highest passing rates for thorax and pelvis sites compared to other planes. DVH analysis indicated that doses to target volumes remained within specified tolerances for all cases. The most significant OAR dose discrepancies were observed in the H&N region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating DVH metrics into the RapidArc PSQA protocol can yield clinically significant results closely aligned with the gamma index. It was observed that a single action-level approach cannot be universally applied to DVH metrics across different anatomical sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":47283,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"29 6","pages":"675-689"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive site-specific analysis of patient-specific quality assurance based on dose volume histogram of RapidArc treatment delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Sumanta Manna, Benoy Kumar Singh, K J Maria Das\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/rpor.103529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current study aims to evaluate the use of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics as part of a comprehensive pre-treatment quality assurance (PSQA) protocol for RapidArc treatment delivery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of ninety patients were included in this study, with the patient population divided into four groups: Brain (n = 15), Head and Neck (H & N) (n = 30), Thorax (n = 15), and Pelvis (n = 30) RapidArc plans. The delivered dose was assessed using the Octavius 4D 1500 detector array and the Verisoft DVH application, focusing on DVH-related errors pertaining to targets and organ-at-risk (OARs). Additionally, three-dimensional local and global gamma passing rates were analyzed in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes using various gamma criteria, including 3 mm/3%, 3 mm/2%, 2 mm/3%, and 2 mm/2%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All treatment plans met the action level requirement, achieving a gamma acceptance rate exceeding 95% with a 3%/3 mm criterion. Among the anatomical planes, the transverse plane consistently exhibited the highest passing rates for various global gamma criteria across all treatment sites. Local gamma analysis revealed that the coronal plane had the highest passing rates for thorax and pelvis sites compared to other planes. DVH analysis indicated that doses to target volumes remained within specified tolerances for all cases. The most significant OAR dose discrepancies were observed in the H&N region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating DVH metrics into the RapidArc PSQA protocol can yield clinically significant results closely aligned with the gamma index. It was observed that a single action-level approach cannot be universally applied to DVH metrics across different anatomical sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"675-689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.103529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.103529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前的研究旨在评估剂量-体积直方图(DVH)指标作为RapidArc治疗递送的综合治疗前质量保证(PSQA)方案的一部分的使用。材料和方法:本研究共纳入90例患者,患者人群分为四组:脑(n = 15)、头颈部(H & n) (n = 30)、胸腔(n = 15)和骨盆(n = 30)。使用Octavius 4D 1500探测器阵列和Verisoft DVH应用程序评估给药剂量,重点关注与靶标和危险器官(OARs)相关的DVH相关误差。此外,在轴位、冠状面和矢状面使用各种伽马标准(包括3mm /3%、3mm /2%、2mm /3%和2mm /2%)分析三维局部和全局伽马通过率。结果:所有治疗方案均达到行动水平要求,以3%/ 3mm为标准,伽玛满意率超过95%。在解剖平面中,横切面在所有治疗部位的各种全局伽玛标准中始终表现出最高的通过率。局部伽玛分析显示,冠状面与其他平面相比,胸部和骨盆部位的通过率最高。DVH分析表明,所有病例的靶量剂量均在规定的耐受范围内。在H&N地区观察到最显著的OAR剂量差异。结论:将DVH指标整合到RapidArc PSQA方案中可以产生与gamma指数密切相关的临床显著结果。我们观察到,单一的行动水平方法不能普遍适用于不同解剖部位的DVH指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive site-specific analysis of patient-specific quality assurance based on dose volume histogram of RapidArc treatment delivery.

Background: The current study aims to evaluate the use of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics as part of a comprehensive pre-treatment quality assurance (PSQA) protocol for RapidArc treatment delivery.

Materials and methods: A total of ninety patients were included in this study, with the patient population divided into four groups: Brain (n = 15), Head and Neck (H & N) (n = 30), Thorax (n = 15), and Pelvis (n = 30) RapidArc plans. The delivered dose was assessed using the Octavius 4D 1500 detector array and the Verisoft DVH application, focusing on DVH-related errors pertaining to targets and organ-at-risk (OARs). Additionally, three-dimensional local and global gamma passing rates were analyzed in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes using various gamma criteria, including 3 mm/3%, 3 mm/2%, 2 mm/3%, and 2 mm/2%.

Results: All treatment plans met the action level requirement, achieving a gamma acceptance rate exceeding 95% with a 3%/3 mm criterion. Among the anatomical planes, the transverse plane consistently exhibited the highest passing rates for various global gamma criteria across all treatment sites. Local gamma analysis revealed that the coronal plane had the highest passing rates for thorax and pelvis sites compared to other planes. DVH analysis indicated that doses to target volumes remained within specified tolerances for all cases. The most significant OAR dose discrepancies were observed in the H&N region.

Conclusion: Integrating DVH metrics into the RapidArc PSQA protocol can yield clinically significant results closely aligned with the gamma index. It was observed that a single action-level approach cannot be universally applied to DVH metrics across different anatomical sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is an interdisciplinary bimonthly journal, publishing original contributions in clinical oncology and radiotherapy, as well as in radiotherapy physics, techniques and radiotherapy equipment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is a journal of the Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Czech Society of Radiation Oncology, the Hungarian Society for Radiation Oncology, the Slovenian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Polish Study Group of Head and Neck Cancer, the Guild of Bulgarian Radiotherapists and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, affiliated with the Spanish Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and the Portuguese Society of Radiotherapy - Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信