{"title":"衡量医疗保健部门的生产力:文献计量学和内容分析。","authors":"Ionela-Andreea Puiu, Abigaela Bîlbîie","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00612-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Productivity in the healthcare sector has evolved as an appealing research topic in the last few years. Despite the growing interest, the extant scientific literature mostly concentrates on methodologies rather than theoretical and practical insights. Although diverse methodologies provide valuable quantitative wisdom, their application is often misaligned with broader economic theories or healthcare purposes, limiting their contribution to advancing theoretical and practical understanding of efficiency and productivity in healthcare systems. In this respect, the current study endeavors to bridge the research gap concerning the lack of a comprehensive overview of productivity measurements in the healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigate this concern through a bibliometric and content analysis of articles published on healthcare productivity measurement techniques in the Web of Science database between 2003 and 2023. We provide a quantitative and critical analysis of conceptualization, methods, findings, and implications of the selected published articles concerning productivity measurements in the healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our research discovered that the sanitary crisis generated by COVID-19 boosted the publication of scientific papers on productivity measurements in healthcare, with Europe emerging as a leading region in publication output. Although Data Envelopment Analysis and the Malmquist Index monopolize the range of measurement techniques used to quantify productivity, current research highlights the requirement for alternative methodologies to grasp the multidimensionality of healthcare productivity, including its interaction with quality and technological progress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We raise awareness that future efforts should prioritize multidimensional and context-sensitive approaches to measuring healthcare productivity, balancing efficiency, technological progress, and quality of care. Policymakers should focus on designing context-specific policies tailored to regional challenges and promoting targeted research funding to explore underrepresented areas of healthcare services.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring productivity in the healthcare sector: a bibliometric and content analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ionela-Andreea Puiu, Abigaela Bîlbîie\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00612-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Productivity in the healthcare sector has evolved as an appealing research topic in the last few years. Despite the growing interest, the extant scientific literature mostly concentrates on methodologies rather than theoretical and practical insights. Although diverse methodologies provide valuable quantitative wisdom, their application is often misaligned with broader economic theories or healthcare purposes, limiting their contribution to advancing theoretical and practical understanding of efficiency and productivity in healthcare systems. In this respect, the current study endeavors to bridge the research gap concerning the lack of a comprehensive overview of productivity measurements in the healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigate this concern through a bibliometric and content analysis of articles published on healthcare productivity measurement techniques in the Web of Science database between 2003 and 2023. We provide a quantitative and critical analysis of conceptualization, methods, findings, and implications of the selected published articles concerning productivity measurements in the healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our research discovered that the sanitary crisis generated by COVID-19 boosted the publication of scientific papers on productivity measurements in healthcare, with Europe emerging as a leading region in publication output. Although Data Envelopment Analysis and the Malmquist Index monopolize the range of measurement techniques used to quantify productivity, current research highlights the requirement for alternative methodologies to grasp the multidimensionality of healthcare productivity, including its interaction with quality and technological progress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We raise awareness that future efforts should prioritize multidimensional and context-sensitive approaches to measuring healthcare productivity, balancing efficiency, technological progress, and quality of care. Policymakers should focus on designing context-specific policies tailored to regional challenges and promoting targeted research funding to explore underrepresented areas of healthcare services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00612-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00612-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在过去的几年里,医疗保健部门的生产力已经发展成为一个有吸引力的研究课题。尽管人们的兴趣越来越浓厚,但现有的科学文献大多集中在方法论上,而不是理论和实践的见解。尽管不同的方法提供了有价值的定量智慧,但它们的应用往往与更广泛的经济理论或医疗保健目的不一致,限制了它们对提高医疗保健系统效率和生产力的理论和实践理解的贡献。在这方面,目前的研究努力弥合有关缺乏在医疗保健部门的生产力测量的全面概述的研究差距。方法:我们通过对2003年至2023年在Web of Science数据库中发表的关于医疗保健生产力测量技术的文章进行文献计量学和内容分析来研究这一问题。我们提供了一个定量的和批判性的分析的概念,方法,研究结果,并选定发表的文章有关的生产力测量在医疗保健部门的影响。结果:我们的研究发现,COVID-19引发的卫生危机促进了有关医疗保健生产力衡量的科学论文的发表,欧洲正在成为出版物产量的领先地区。虽然数据包络分析和Malmquist指数垄断了用于量化生产力的测量技术范围,但当前的研究强调了对替代方法的需求,以掌握医疗保健生产力的多维度,包括其与质量和技术进步的相互作用。结论:我们提高了人们的认识,即未来的工作应优先考虑多维度和上下文敏感的方法来衡量医疗保健生产力,平衡效率、技术进步和护理质量。决策者应该把重点放在设计针对地区挑战的具体情况的政策,并促进有针对性的研究资助,以探索代表性不足的医疗保健服务领域。
Measuring productivity in the healthcare sector: a bibliometric and content analysis.
Background: Productivity in the healthcare sector has evolved as an appealing research topic in the last few years. Despite the growing interest, the extant scientific literature mostly concentrates on methodologies rather than theoretical and practical insights. Although diverse methodologies provide valuable quantitative wisdom, their application is often misaligned with broader economic theories or healthcare purposes, limiting their contribution to advancing theoretical and practical understanding of efficiency and productivity in healthcare systems. In this respect, the current study endeavors to bridge the research gap concerning the lack of a comprehensive overview of productivity measurements in the healthcare sector.
Methods: We investigate this concern through a bibliometric and content analysis of articles published on healthcare productivity measurement techniques in the Web of Science database between 2003 and 2023. We provide a quantitative and critical analysis of conceptualization, methods, findings, and implications of the selected published articles concerning productivity measurements in the healthcare sector.
Results: Our research discovered that the sanitary crisis generated by COVID-19 boosted the publication of scientific papers on productivity measurements in healthcare, with Europe emerging as a leading region in publication output. Although Data Envelopment Analysis and the Malmquist Index monopolize the range of measurement techniques used to quantify productivity, current research highlights the requirement for alternative methodologies to grasp the multidimensionality of healthcare productivity, including its interaction with quality and technological progress.
Conclusions: We raise awareness that future efforts should prioritize multidimensional and context-sensitive approaches to measuring healthcare productivity, balancing efficiency, technological progress, and quality of care. Policymakers should focus on designing context-specific policies tailored to regional challenges and promoting targeted research funding to explore underrepresented areas of healthcare services.
期刊介绍:
Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.