围绕俄罗斯LGBTIQ+活动人士遭受暴力的移情报道(德米特里·奇热夫斯基和安娜·普鲁茨科娃的案例)。

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Evgeny Shtorn
{"title":"围绕俄罗斯LGBTIQ+活动人士遭受暴力的移情报道(德米特里·奇热夫斯基和安娜·普鲁茨科娃的案例)。","authors":"Evgeny Shtorn","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2480774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article serves two interconnected purposes. First, it examines media coverage of the violent attack on LGBTIQ+ activists Dmitry Chizhevsky and Anna Prutskova at the St. Petersburg community center LaSky on 3 November 2013. Two masked assailants entered the center and opened fire, severely injuring Dmitry and wounding Anna. The attack occurred amid heightened public debates surrounding the \"gay propaganda\" law, which intensified hostility toward LGBTIQ+ individuals. This study critically assesses how Russian media framed the violence, shaping public perception of activists at the forefront of LGBTIQ+ rights struggles. Secondly, the article engages with the standpoint theory, foregrounding the author's explicit political and ethical stance. Rather than employing conventional research methods such as interviews, this study integrates activist perspectives into academic discourse, reflecting the author's transition from activism to scholarship. This approach challenges the notion of detached objectivity, particularly in addressing structural discrimination and violence. The article advocates empathetic reporting, emphasizing its role in upholding human rights and countering systemic erasure. By combining critical media analysis with an activist lens, this article underscores how media portrayals of violence against LGBTIQ+ individuals shape public perception and discourse. It argues that acknowledging positionality enriches scholarly engagement with social justice issues, providing an insider perspective often dismissed in favor of perceived neutrality or objectivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empathetic Reporting Surrounding the Violence Against LGBTIQ+ Activists in Russia (The Case of Dmitry Chizhevsky and Anna Prutskova).\",\"authors\":\"Evgeny Shtorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2480774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article serves two interconnected purposes. First, it examines media coverage of the violent attack on LGBTIQ+ activists Dmitry Chizhevsky and Anna Prutskova at the St. Petersburg community center LaSky on 3 November 2013. Two masked assailants entered the center and opened fire, severely injuring Dmitry and wounding Anna. The attack occurred amid heightened public debates surrounding the \\\"gay propaganda\\\" law, which intensified hostility toward LGBTIQ+ individuals. This study critically assesses how Russian media framed the violence, shaping public perception of activists at the forefront of LGBTIQ+ rights struggles. Secondly, the article engages with the standpoint theory, foregrounding the author's explicit political and ethical stance. Rather than employing conventional research methods such as interviews, this study integrates activist perspectives into academic discourse, reflecting the author's transition from activism to scholarship. This approach challenges the notion of detached objectivity, particularly in addressing structural discrimination and violence. The article advocates empathetic reporting, emphasizing its role in upholding human rights and countering systemic erasure. By combining critical media analysis with an activist lens, this article underscores how media portrayals of violence against LGBTIQ+ individuals shape public perception and discourse. It argues that acknowledging positionality enriches scholarly engagement with social justice issues, providing an insider perspective often dismissed in favor of perceived neutrality or objectivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2480774\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2480774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章有两个相互关联的目的。首先,报告检视媒体对2013年11月3日在圣彼得堡社区中心LaSky发生的LGBTIQ+活动人士Dmitry Chizhevsky和Anna Prutskova遭暴力攻击事件的报导。两名蒙面袭击者进入中心并开枪,德米特里严重受伤,安娜受伤。这起袭击发生时,公众正围绕“同性恋宣传”法展开激烈辩论,该法律加剧了对LGBTIQ+个人的敌意。这项研究批判性地评估了俄罗斯媒体如何塑造暴力,塑造公众对LGBTIQ+权利斗争前沿活动家的看法。其次,文章运用立场理论,突出了作者明确的政治伦理立场。本研究没有采用访谈等传统研究方法,而是将行动者视角融入学术话语,反映了作者从行动者向学术的过渡。这种方法挑战了超然客观的概念,特别是在处理结构性歧视和暴力方面。这篇文章提倡移情报道,强调其在维护人权和反对系统性抹杀方面的作用。通过结合批判性媒体分析和活动家的视角,本文强调了媒体对LGBTIQ+个体遭受暴力的描述如何影响公众的认知和话语。它认为,承认立场丰富了对社会正义问题的学术参与,提供了一种内部视角,这种视角往往被认为是中立或客观的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empathetic Reporting Surrounding the Violence Against LGBTIQ+ Activists in Russia (The Case of Dmitry Chizhevsky and Anna Prutskova).

This article serves two interconnected purposes. First, it examines media coverage of the violent attack on LGBTIQ+ activists Dmitry Chizhevsky and Anna Prutskova at the St. Petersburg community center LaSky on 3 November 2013. Two masked assailants entered the center and opened fire, severely injuring Dmitry and wounding Anna. The attack occurred amid heightened public debates surrounding the "gay propaganda" law, which intensified hostility toward LGBTIQ+ individuals. This study critically assesses how Russian media framed the violence, shaping public perception of activists at the forefront of LGBTIQ+ rights struggles. Secondly, the article engages with the standpoint theory, foregrounding the author's explicit political and ethical stance. Rather than employing conventional research methods such as interviews, this study integrates activist perspectives into academic discourse, reflecting the author's transition from activism to scholarship. This approach challenges the notion of detached objectivity, particularly in addressing structural discrimination and violence. The article advocates empathetic reporting, emphasizing its role in upholding human rights and countering systemic erasure. By combining critical media analysis with an activist lens, this article underscores how media portrayals of violence against LGBTIQ+ individuals shape public perception and discourse. It argues that acknowledging positionality enriches scholarly engagement with social justice issues, providing an insider perspective often dismissed in favor of perceived neutrality or objectivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信