标题X:格鲁吉亚避孕指南实施的提供者经验和看法:一项定性研究。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sophia C Garbarino, Elizabeth Reisinger Walker, Melissa J Kottke, Hayat Mekonen, Jessica M Sales
{"title":"标题X:格鲁吉亚避孕指南实施的提供者经验和看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Sophia C Garbarino, Elizabeth Reisinger Walker, Melissa J Kottke, Hayat Mekonen, Jessica M Sales","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Georgia Title X sites serve over 160,000 patients per year, providing critical contraceptive access. The U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria and Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC SPR) are meant to increase contraception access, but few studies have explored U.S. MEC SPR implementation. This qualitative study aimed to understand Georgia Title X providers' experiences with and attitudes toward U.S. MEC SPR implementation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>From March 2023 to December 2023, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 Georgia Title X providers. Participants also completed a short demographic survey. Transcripts were first assessed using rapid analysis techniques in Google Sheets, then analyzed more thoroughly with a thematic analysis approach in Dedoose. We calculated demographic descriptive statistics using SAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was diverse in race but not gender; all participants identified as cisgender women. Interviews revealed that most participants learned about the guidelines in medical or nursing school. Notable benefits of using the U.S. MEC SPR included facilitating patient contraceptive education and building providers' confidence in their prescribing skills. The only reported challenges were limited user-friendliness and limited information about certain medical conditions in the U.S. MEC. Participants had mixed experiences with clinic leadership prioritizing U.S. MEC SPR use but reported similar perceived patient barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the U.S. MEC SPR can help Title X providers serve clients seeking contraception, but barriers to widespread implementation remain. Efforts to increase guidelines use should consider providers' needs and preferences along with factors impacting patient access to contraceptive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Title X Provider Experiences With and Perceptions of Contraception Guidelines Implementation in Georgia: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sophia C Garbarino, Elizabeth Reisinger Walker, Melissa J Kottke, Hayat Mekonen, Jessica M Sales\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.whi.2025.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Georgia Title X sites serve over 160,000 patients per year, providing critical contraceptive access. The U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria and Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC SPR) are meant to increase contraception access, but few studies have explored U.S. MEC SPR implementation. This qualitative study aimed to understand Georgia Title X providers' experiences with and attitudes toward U.S. MEC SPR implementation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>From March 2023 to December 2023, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 Georgia Title X providers. Participants also completed a short demographic survey. Transcripts were first assessed using rapid analysis techniques in Google Sheets, then analyzed more thoroughly with a thematic analysis approach in Dedoose. We calculated demographic descriptive statistics using SAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was diverse in race but not gender; all participants identified as cisgender women. Interviews revealed that most participants learned about the guidelines in medical or nursing school. Notable benefits of using the U.S. MEC SPR included facilitating patient contraceptive education and building providers' confidence in their prescribing skills. The only reported challenges were limited user-friendliness and limited information about certain medical conditions in the U.S. MEC. Participants had mixed experiences with clinic leadership prioritizing U.S. MEC SPR use but reported similar perceived patient barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the U.S. MEC SPR can help Title X providers serve clients seeking contraception, but barriers to widespread implementation remain. Efforts to increase guidelines use should consider providers' needs and preferences along with factors impacting patient access to contraceptive care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2025.02.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2025.02.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:乔治亚州第十项法案网站每年为超过16万名患者提供服务,提供关键的避孕药具。美国医疗资格标准和避孕使用选择实践建议(美国MEC SPR)旨在增加避孕的可及性,但很少有研究探索美国MEC SPR的实施。本定性研究旨在了解乔治亚州标题X提供者对美国MEC SPR实施的经验和态度。研究设计:从2023年3月到2023年12月,我们对20名乔治亚州标题X提供者进行了半结构化访谈。参与者还完成了一项简短的人口调查。转录本首先在谷歌Sheets中使用快速分析技术进行评估,然后在Dedoose中使用主题分析方法进行更彻底的分析。我们使用SAS计算人口统计学描述性统计。结果:样本在种族上存在差异,但在性别上没有差异;所有参与者都被认定为顺性别女性。采访显示,大多数参与者都是在医学院或护理学校了解到这些指导方针的。使用美国MEC SPR的显著好处包括促进患者避孕教育和建立提供者对其处方技能的信心。唯一报告的挑战是美国MEC的用户友好性有限,以及关于某些医疗条件的信息有限。参与者对临床领导优先使用美国MEC SPR有不同的经历,但报告了类似的患者护理障碍。结论:本研究表明,美国MEC SPR可以帮助标题X提供者为寻求避孕的客户提供服务,但广泛实施的障碍仍然存在。增加指南使用的努力应考虑提供者的需求和偏好以及影响患者获得避孕护理的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Title X Provider Experiences With and Perceptions of Contraception Guidelines Implementation in Georgia: A Qualitative Study.

Objectives: Georgia Title X sites serve over 160,000 patients per year, providing critical contraceptive access. The U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria and Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC SPR) are meant to increase contraception access, but few studies have explored U.S. MEC SPR implementation. This qualitative study aimed to understand Georgia Title X providers' experiences with and attitudes toward U.S. MEC SPR implementation.

Study design: From March 2023 to December 2023, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 Georgia Title X providers. Participants also completed a short demographic survey. Transcripts were first assessed using rapid analysis techniques in Google Sheets, then analyzed more thoroughly with a thematic analysis approach in Dedoose. We calculated demographic descriptive statistics using SAS.

Results: The sample was diverse in race but not gender; all participants identified as cisgender women. Interviews revealed that most participants learned about the guidelines in medical or nursing school. Notable benefits of using the U.S. MEC SPR included facilitating patient contraceptive education and building providers' confidence in their prescribing skills. The only reported challenges were limited user-friendliness and limited information about certain medical conditions in the U.S. MEC. Participants had mixed experiences with clinic leadership prioritizing U.S. MEC SPR use but reported similar perceived patient barriers to care.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the U.S. MEC SPR can help Title X providers serve clients seeking contraception, but barriers to widespread implementation remain. Efforts to increase guidelines use should consider providers' needs and preferences along with factors impacting patient access to contraceptive care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信