Mehdi Ghaderian, Saba Ramezani, Samin Behdad, Mojgan Gharipour, Mehrnoush Dianatkhah, Silva Hovesepian, Negin Salemi
{"title":"I型和II型amplatzer导管闭塞器用于膜周围室间隔缺损闭合的安全性和有效性:一项系统综述。","authors":"Mehdi Ghaderian, Saba Ramezani, Samin Behdad, Mojgan Gharipour, Mehrnoush Dianatkhah, Silva Hovesepian, Negin Salemi","doi":"10.48305/arya.2024.42641.2962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a common congenital heart defect that affects many individuals. Transcatheter closure has become a successful treatment method. However, certain devices used for closure can lead to life-threatening complications such as complete heart block. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Amplatzer duct occluders (ADOs) types I and II for closing perimembranous VSDs (pmVSDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and searched multiple databases for English articles on pmVSD closure using ADO I/II published up to 2022. Relevant keywords were used and the data were categorized to report the incidence of common complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study, which involved 1,691 patients with primary pmVSD and ages ranging from 6 months to 15 years, found that ADO type I had a high success rate with low rates of complete heart block and other complications. ADO type II had a higher rate of severe complications, particularly complete heart block. The overall estimated success rate for device implantation was 97.3%, with only one procedure-related death. The occurrence of complete heart block was 2.3%, and residual shunts were the most frequent complication (4.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this systematic review provide valuable insights into the use of ADO types I and II for closing pmVSDs. Healthcare professionals should be aware of these findings and closely monitor patients who undergo ADO device closure for pmVSDs. Further research is recommended to determine the specific indications for using each type of Amplatzer device in the relevant population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46477,"journal":{"name":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","volume":"20 6","pages":"54-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of using amplatzer ductal occluder type I and II for peri membranous ventricular septal defect closure: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Ghaderian, Saba Ramezani, Samin Behdad, Mojgan Gharipour, Mehrnoush Dianatkhah, Silva Hovesepian, Negin Salemi\",\"doi\":\"10.48305/arya.2024.42641.2962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a common congenital heart defect that affects many individuals. Transcatheter closure has become a successful treatment method. However, certain devices used for closure can lead to life-threatening complications such as complete heart block. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Amplatzer duct occluders (ADOs) types I and II for closing perimembranous VSDs (pmVSDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and searched multiple databases for English articles on pmVSD closure using ADO I/II published up to 2022. Relevant keywords were used and the data were categorized to report the incidence of common complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study, which involved 1,691 patients with primary pmVSD and ages ranging from 6 months to 15 years, found that ADO type I had a high success rate with low rates of complete heart block and other complications. ADO type II had a higher rate of severe complications, particularly complete heart block. The overall estimated success rate for device implantation was 97.3%, with only one procedure-related death. The occurrence of complete heart block was 2.3%, and residual shunts were the most frequent complication (4.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this systematic review provide valuable insights into the use of ADO types I and II for closing pmVSDs. Healthcare professionals should be aware of these findings and closely monitor patients who undergo ADO device closure for pmVSDs. Further research is recommended to determine the specific indications for using each type of Amplatzer device in the relevant population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARYA Atherosclerosis\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"54-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913456/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARYA Atherosclerosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48305/arya.2024.42641.2962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48305/arya.2024.42641.2962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:室间隔缺损(VSD)是一种常见的先天性心脏缺陷,影响着许多人。经导管闭合术已成为一种成功的治疗方法。然而,某些用于闭合的设备可能导致危及生命的并发症,如完全性心脏传导阻滞。本系统性综述旨在评估 I 型和 II 型 Amplatzer 导管封堵器(ADOs)用于关闭膜周 VSD(pmVSDs)的有效性和安全性:本综述遵循 PRISMA 2020 指南,检索了多个数据库中截至 2022 年发表的使用 ADO I/II 封闭 pmVSD 的英文文章。使用了相关关键词,并对数据进行了分类,以报告常见并发症的发生率:研究发现,ADO I型成功率高,完全性心脏传导阻滞和其他并发症发生率低。ADO II 型的严重并发症发生率较高,尤其是完全性心脏传导阻滞。据估计,设备植入的总体成功率为 97.3%,只有一例与手术相关的死亡。完全性心脏传导阻滞的发生率为 2.3%,残余分流是最常见的并发症(4.8%):本系统综述的研究结果为使用 ADO I 型和 II 型关闭 pmVSD 提供了宝贵的见解。医护人员应了解这些发现,并密切监测因 pmVSD 而接受 ADO 装置闭合术的患者。建议开展进一步研究,以确定在相关人群中使用每种类型 Amplatzer 装置的具体适应症。
Safety and efficacy of using amplatzer ductal occluder type I and II for peri membranous ventricular septal defect closure: A systematic review.
Background: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a common congenital heart defect that affects many individuals. Transcatheter closure has become a successful treatment method. However, certain devices used for closure can lead to life-threatening complications such as complete heart block. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Amplatzer duct occluders (ADOs) types I and II for closing perimembranous VSDs (pmVSDs).
Methods: This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and searched multiple databases for English articles on pmVSD closure using ADO I/II published up to 2022. Relevant keywords were used and the data were categorized to report the incidence of common complications.
Results: The study, which involved 1,691 patients with primary pmVSD and ages ranging from 6 months to 15 years, found that ADO type I had a high success rate with low rates of complete heart block and other complications. ADO type II had a higher rate of severe complications, particularly complete heart block. The overall estimated success rate for device implantation was 97.3%, with only one procedure-related death. The occurrence of complete heart block was 2.3%, and residual shunts were the most frequent complication (4.8%).
Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review provide valuable insights into the use of ADO types I and II for closing pmVSDs. Healthcare professionals should be aware of these findings and closely monitor patients who undergo ADO device closure for pmVSDs. Further research is recommended to determine the specific indications for using each type of Amplatzer device in the relevant population.