矿物油的粘度和数量影响渗透压,不影响胚胎发育。

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Zygote Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1017/S0967199425000012
Hiroyuki Watanabe, Mikiko Tokoro, Masae Kojima, Chizuru Kudo, Kazuho Ihara, Noritaka Fukunaga, Yoshimasa Asada
{"title":"矿物油的粘度和数量影响渗透压,不影响胚胎发育。","authors":"Hiroyuki Watanabe, Mikiko Tokoro, Masae Kojima, Chizuru Kudo, Kazuho Ihara, Noritaka Fukunaga, Yoshimasa Asada","doi":"10.1017/S0967199425000012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dry incubators prevent bacterial growth and allow time-lapse imaging. However, they cause more significant osmotic pressure changes in the culture medium than in humidified incubators. Few reports have explored the effect of osmotic pressure on human embryos cultured under different conditions. This study examined how changes in osmotic pressure affect human embryos in a dry incubator. The study incubated embryos in culture mediums covered with mineral oil of varying viscosities and quantities. The osmotic pressure of the culture medium was measured daily for six-day period (Day 0-6) in four experimental groups established by varying the viscosity and volume of mineral oil: low viscosity (Light), 3.0 ml or 4.5 ml, and high viscosity (Heavy), 3.0 ml or 4.5 ml of mineral oil. The Light 3.0 ml and Heavy 4.5 ml groups, showing the greatest difference in the osmotic pressure, were used to culture of human embryos. After six days of incubation, the osmotic pressure increased the most in Light 3.0 ml group. Heavy 4.5 ml group had the smallest change. However, no significant differences were noted in the formation rates of blastocysts, good-quality blastocysts, or cell count between the two groups. The study suggests that even when the culture medium is covered with heavy mineral oil in a dry incubator, osmotic pressure increases after six days but does not significantly affect the formation of blastocysts. These findings provide valuable insights into the effects of varying osmotic pressure on embryonic development and may help in optimizing conditions for <i>in vitro</i> fertilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":24075,"journal":{"name":"Zygote","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mineral oil viscosity and quantity impact osmotic pressure, not embryo development.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Watanabe, Mikiko Tokoro, Masae Kojima, Chizuru Kudo, Kazuho Ihara, Noritaka Fukunaga, Yoshimasa Asada\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0967199425000012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dry incubators prevent bacterial growth and allow time-lapse imaging. However, they cause more significant osmotic pressure changes in the culture medium than in humidified incubators. Few reports have explored the effect of osmotic pressure on human embryos cultured under different conditions. This study examined how changes in osmotic pressure affect human embryos in a dry incubator. The study incubated embryos in culture mediums covered with mineral oil of varying viscosities and quantities. The osmotic pressure of the culture medium was measured daily for six-day period (Day 0-6) in four experimental groups established by varying the viscosity and volume of mineral oil: low viscosity (Light), 3.0 ml or 4.5 ml, and high viscosity (Heavy), 3.0 ml or 4.5 ml of mineral oil. The Light 3.0 ml and Heavy 4.5 ml groups, showing the greatest difference in the osmotic pressure, were used to culture of human embryos. After six days of incubation, the osmotic pressure increased the most in Light 3.0 ml group. Heavy 4.5 ml group had the smallest change. However, no significant differences were noted in the formation rates of blastocysts, good-quality blastocysts, or cell count between the two groups. The study suggests that even when the culture medium is covered with heavy mineral oil in a dry incubator, osmotic pressure increases after six days but does not significantly affect the formation of blastocysts. These findings provide valuable insights into the effects of varying osmotic pressure on embryonic development and may help in optimizing conditions for <i>in vitro</i> fertilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zygote\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zygote\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199425000012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zygote","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199425000012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

干燥培养箱防止细菌生长,并允许延时成像。然而,它们在培养基中引起的渗透压变化比在加湿培养箱中引起的渗透压变化更显著。很少有报道探讨渗透压对不同条件下培养的人类胚胎的影响。这项研究考察了在干燥培养箱中渗透压的变化如何影响人类胚胎。该研究在覆盖有不同粘度和数量矿物油的培养基中培养胚胎。通过改变矿物油的粘度和体积建立4个实验组:低粘度(轻),3.0 ml或4.5 ml,高粘度(重),3.0 ml或4.5 ml的矿物油,每天测量培养基的渗透压,为期6天(第0-6天)。用渗透压差异最大的轻3.0 ml组和重4.5 ml组培养人胚胎。孵育6 d后,以Light 3.0 ml组渗透压升高最多。重度4.5 ml组变化最小。然而,两组之间囊胚的形成率、优质囊胚或细胞计数没有显著差异。该研究表明,即使在干燥培养箱中用重矿物油覆盖培养基,渗透压在6天后也会增加,但对囊胚的形成没有明显影响。这些发现为不同渗透压对胚胎发育的影响提供了有价值的见解,并可能有助于优化体外受精的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mineral oil viscosity and quantity impact osmotic pressure, not embryo development.

Dry incubators prevent bacterial growth and allow time-lapse imaging. However, they cause more significant osmotic pressure changes in the culture medium than in humidified incubators. Few reports have explored the effect of osmotic pressure on human embryos cultured under different conditions. This study examined how changes in osmotic pressure affect human embryos in a dry incubator. The study incubated embryos in culture mediums covered with mineral oil of varying viscosities and quantities. The osmotic pressure of the culture medium was measured daily for six-day period (Day 0-6) in four experimental groups established by varying the viscosity and volume of mineral oil: low viscosity (Light), 3.0 ml or 4.5 ml, and high viscosity (Heavy), 3.0 ml or 4.5 ml of mineral oil. The Light 3.0 ml and Heavy 4.5 ml groups, showing the greatest difference in the osmotic pressure, were used to culture of human embryos. After six days of incubation, the osmotic pressure increased the most in Light 3.0 ml group. Heavy 4.5 ml group had the smallest change. However, no significant differences were noted in the formation rates of blastocysts, good-quality blastocysts, or cell count between the two groups. The study suggests that even when the culture medium is covered with heavy mineral oil in a dry incubator, osmotic pressure increases after six days but does not significantly affect the formation of blastocysts. These findings provide valuable insights into the effects of varying osmotic pressure on embryonic development and may help in optimizing conditions for in vitro fertilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zygote
Zygote 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: An international journal dedicated to the rapid publication of original research in early embryology, Zygote covers interdisciplinary studies on gametogenesis through fertilization to gastrulation in animals and humans. The scope has been expanded to include clinical papers, molecular and developmental genetics. The editors will favour work describing fundamental processes in the cellular and molecular mechanisms of animal development, and, in particular, the identification of unifying principles in biology. Nonetheless, new technologies, review articles, debates and letters will become a prominent feature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信