IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005338
Jonathan Dalton, Rachel Huang, Alec Giakas, Michael Carter, Robert J Oris, Jeremy Heard, Chloe K Herczeg, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alexander Charlton, Evgeniy V Uvarov, Sehajvir Singh, Mark F Kurd, Jeffrey A Rihn, Ian David Kaye, Thomas D Cha, John J Mangan, Jose Canseco, Alan Hilibrand, Alexander Vaccaro, Gregory Schroeder, Christopher Kepler
{"title":"Impact of Chronic Preoperative Gabapentinoid Exposure on Surgical and Patient Reported Outcome Measures following Lumbar Fusion.","authors":"Jonathan Dalton, Rachel Huang, Alec Giakas, Michael Carter, Robert J Oris, Jeremy Heard, Chloe K Herczeg, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alexander Charlton, Evgeniy V Uvarov, Sehajvir Singh, Mark F Kurd, Jeffrey A Rihn, Ian David Kaye, Thomas D Cha, John J Mangan, Jose Canseco, Alan Hilibrand, Alexander Vaccaro, Gregory Schroeder, Christopher Kepler","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relationship between long-term gabapentinoid use and outcomes after lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Gabapentinoids, which include gabapentin and pregabalin, are commonly prescribed for radiculopathic pain. Basic science research has indicated that gabapentinoids may be detrimental to bone health/healing and clinical works has shown that initiating gabapentinoids at the time of spine surgery may decrease postoperative opioid requirements and increase risks of adverse outcomes. Despite these findings, no literature exists examining the impact of chronic gabapentinoid prescriptions on outcomes after lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients who underwent elective one/two-level lumbar fusion (2017-2022) were identified via Structured Query Language search. Patient demographic/surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and preoperative gabapentinoid use were collected. Perioperative opioid data were collected utilizing the Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Appropriate statistical analyses were conducted with alpha set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst 461 included patients, 47 (10.2%) and 61 (13.2%) were chronically prescribed pregabalin and gabapentin, respectively. All groups were similar in terms of demographics, and surgical type/complexity. There were no differences in surgical outcomes, including two-year revision rate. Patients taking pregabalin consumed more total MMEs compared to gabapentin (132±344 vs. 104±351, P=0.022) and non-gabapentinoid patients (132±344 vs. 90.3±267, P=0.007). However, preoperative total MMEs were similar 60 days prior to surgery. Bivariate analysis demonstrated postoperative differences in back pain improvement at six-months (P=0.025) between groups, however pairwise comparison did not show significance. Similarly, multivariate analysis did not show gabapentinoid usage as independently predictive of back pain scores. All other PROM comparisons were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite compelling basic science literature suggesting gabapentinoid exposure hindering bone health and healing capacity, the current investigation did not find an increase in surgical revision or other adverse outcomes, including opioid use and PROMs, associated with chronic preoperative gabapentinoid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性队列:评估长期使用加巴喷丁与腰椎融合术后疗效之间的关系:加巴喷丁类药物包括加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林,是治疗根神经痛的常用处方药。基础科学研究表明,加巴喷丁类药物可能不利于骨骼健康/愈合,而临床工作表明,在脊柱手术时使用加巴喷丁类药物可能会减少术后阿片类药物的需求量,并增加不良后果的风险。尽管有这些研究结果,但目前还没有文献研究长期服用加巴喷丁类药物对腰椎融合术后疗效的影响:通过结构化查询语言搜索确定了接受选择性一/两级腰椎融合术的成人患者(2017-2022 年)。收集了患者的人口统计学/手术特征、手术结果、患者报告的结果测量指标(PROMs)以及术前加巴喷丁胺的使用情况。利用宾夕法尼亚州处方药监测计划收集了围手术期阿片类药物数据。进行了适当的统计分析,阿尔法值设定为 0.05:在纳入的 461 名患者中,分别有 47 人(10.2%)和 61 人(13.2%)长期服用普瑞巴林和加巴喷丁。所有组别在人口统计学、手术类型/复杂性方面相似。手术结果(包括两年翻修率)方面没有差异。与加巴喷丁(132±344 vs. 104±351,P=0.022)和非加巴喷丁患者(132±344 vs. 90.3±267,P=0.007)相比,服用普瑞巴林的患者消耗的MME总量更多。不过,术前60天的总MME值相似。双变量分析显示,各组患者术后六个月背痛改善情况存在差异(P=0.025),但配对比较未显示出显著性。同样,多变量分析也未显示使用加巴喷丁诺类药物对背痛评分有独立的预测作用。所有其他PROM比较结果在各组之间相似:尽管令人信服的基础科学文献表明,接触加巴喷丁类药物会阻碍骨骼健康和愈合能力,但目前的调查并未发现术前长期使用加巴喷丁类药物会增加手术翻修或其他不良后果,包括阿片类药物的使用和PROMs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Chronic Preoperative Gabapentinoid Exposure on Surgical and Patient Reported Outcome Measures following Lumbar Fusion.

Study design: Retrospective cohort.

Objective: To assess the relationship between long-term gabapentinoid use and outcomes after lumbar fusion.

Summary of background data: Gabapentinoids, which include gabapentin and pregabalin, are commonly prescribed for radiculopathic pain. Basic science research has indicated that gabapentinoids may be detrimental to bone health/healing and clinical works has shown that initiating gabapentinoids at the time of spine surgery may decrease postoperative opioid requirements and increase risks of adverse outcomes. Despite these findings, no literature exists examining the impact of chronic gabapentinoid prescriptions on outcomes after lumbar fusion.

Methods: Adult patients who underwent elective one/two-level lumbar fusion (2017-2022) were identified via Structured Query Language search. Patient demographic/surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and preoperative gabapentinoid use were collected. Perioperative opioid data were collected utilizing the Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Appropriate statistical analyses were conducted with alpha set at 0.05.

Results: Amongst 461 included patients, 47 (10.2%) and 61 (13.2%) were chronically prescribed pregabalin and gabapentin, respectively. All groups were similar in terms of demographics, and surgical type/complexity. There were no differences in surgical outcomes, including two-year revision rate. Patients taking pregabalin consumed more total MMEs compared to gabapentin (132±344 vs. 104±351, P=0.022) and non-gabapentinoid patients (132±344 vs. 90.3±267, P=0.007). However, preoperative total MMEs were similar 60 days prior to surgery. Bivariate analysis demonstrated postoperative differences in back pain improvement at six-months (P=0.025) between groups, however pairwise comparison did not show significance. Similarly, multivariate analysis did not show gabapentinoid usage as independently predictive of back pain scores. All other PROM comparisons were similar between groups.

Conclusion: Despite compelling basic science literature suggesting gabapentinoid exposure hindering bone health and healing capacity, the current investigation did not find an increase in surgical revision or other adverse outcomes, including opioid use and PROMs, associated with chronic preoperative gabapentinoid use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信