综合回顾双门静脉内窥镜脊柱手术:微创脊柱手术的历史、技术和意义。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005335
Alexander Yu, Samuel Q Li, Laura Ndjonko, Jamie Frost, Daniel Berman, Hyun-Jin Park, Samuel K Cho
{"title":"综合回顾双门静脉内窥镜脊柱手术:微创脊柱手术的历史、技术和意义。","authors":"Alexander Yu, Samuel Q Li, Laura Ndjonko, Jamie Frost, Daniel Berman, Hyun-Jin Park, Samuel K Cho","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Narrative review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide an overview of the evolution of biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BE) and its role in addressing specific challenges in minimally invasive spinal procedures, focusing on its technical features and clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Minimally invasive spine surgery has gained momentum due to its ability to reduce tissue damage, postoperative pain, and recovery times compared to traditional open surgery. BE has emerged as an innovative technique, offering unique visualization and maneuverability that allow for addressing complex spinal pathologies with comparable outcomes to other minimally invasive techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review explores the development of BE, its advantages and disadvantages compared to traditional and full endoscopic spine surgery, and its application in various spinal conditions, based on current literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BE facilitates enhanced visualization and maneuverability through the use of two independent portals, which allow for precise decompression, discectomy, and fusion procedures with minimal muscle disruption. Studies suggest that BE is well-suited for specific cases requiring delicate tissue handling and complex anatomical access. Studies report reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery compared to traditional methods. While challenges such as longer operation times and learning curves exist, BE offers a valuable alternative to other minimally invasive techniques in procedures like lumbar laminectomy, foraminotomy, and interbody fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biportal endoscopic spine surgery represents an important addition to the arsenal of minimally invasive spine techniques. Its flexibility and adaptability make it a promising option for specific spinal pathologies, particularly in cases where other techniques may pose limitations. Future research should focus on refining surgical protocols, enhancing training frameworks, and expanding the application of BE to other spinal regions and complex conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Review of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: History, Techniques, and Implications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Yu, Samuel Q Li, Laura Ndjonko, Jamie Frost, Daniel Berman, Hyun-Jin Park, Samuel K Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Narrative review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide an overview of the evolution of biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BE) and its role in addressing specific challenges in minimally invasive spinal procedures, focusing on its technical features and clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Minimally invasive spine surgery has gained momentum due to its ability to reduce tissue damage, postoperative pain, and recovery times compared to traditional open surgery. BE has emerged as an innovative technique, offering unique visualization and maneuverability that allow for addressing complex spinal pathologies with comparable outcomes to other minimally invasive techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review explores the development of BE, its advantages and disadvantages compared to traditional and full endoscopic spine surgery, and its application in various spinal conditions, based on current literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BE facilitates enhanced visualization and maneuverability through the use of two independent portals, which allow for precise decompression, discectomy, and fusion procedures with minimal muscle disruption. Studies suggest that BE is well-suited for specific cases requiring delicate tissue handling and complex anatomical access. Studies report reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery compared to traditional methods. While challenges such as longer operation times and learning curves exist, BE offers a valuable alternative to other minimally invasive techniques in procedures like lumbar laminectomy, foraminotomy, and interbody fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biportal endoscopic spine surgery represents an important addition to the arsenal of minimally invasive spine techniques. Its flexibility and adaptability make it a promising option for specific spinal pathologies, particularly in cases where other techniques may pose limitations. Future research should focus on refining surgical protocols, enhancing training frameworks, and expanding the application of BE to other spinal regions and complex conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005335\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:叙述性回顾。目的:概述双门静脉内窥镜脊柱手术(BE)的发展及其在解决微创脊柱手术中的具体挑战中的作用,重点介绍其技术特点和临床应用。背景资料总结:与传统的开放手术相比,微创脊柱手术由于其减少组织损伤、术后疼痛和恢复时间的能力而获得了发展势头。BE已经成为一种创新技术,提供独特的可视化和可操作性,可以解决复杂的脊柱病变,其结果与其他微创技术相当。方法:在文献基础上,综述BE手术的发展、与传统及全内窥镜脊柱手术相比的优缺点以及在各种脊柱疾病中的应用。结果:BE通过使用两个独立的入口,增强了可视化和可操作性,这使得精确的减压、椎间盘切除术和融合手术对肌肉的破坏最小。研究表明,BE非常适合需要精细组织处理和复杂解剖通路的特定病例。研究报告称,与传统方法相比,该方法减少了术后疼痛,缩短了住院时间,恢复速度更快。尽管存在手术时间较长和学习曲线等挑战,但BE在腰椎椎板切除术、椎间孔切开术和椎间融合术等微创手术中提供了有价值的替代技术。结论:双门静脉内窥镜脊柱手术是微创脊柱技术的重要补充。它的灵活性和适应性使其成为特定脊柱病变的有希望的选择,特别是在其他技术可能造成限制的情况下。未来的研究应侧重于完善手术方案,加强培训框架,并将BE扩展到其他脊柱区域和复杂情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive Review of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: History, Techniques, and Implications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Study design: Narrative review.

Objective: To provide an overview of the evolution of biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BE) and its role in addressing specific challenges in minimally invasive spinal procedures, focusing on its technical features and clinical applications.

Summary of background data: Minimally invasive spine surgery has gained momentum due to its ability to reduce tissue damage, postoperative pain, and recovery times compared to traditional open surgery. BE has emerged as an innovative technique, offering unique visualization and maneuverability that allow for addressing complex spinal pathologies with comparable outcomes to other minimally invasive techniques.

Methods: This review explores the development of BE, its advantages and disadvantages compared to traditional and full endoscopic spine surgery, and its application in various spinal conditions, based on current literature.

Results: BE facilitates enhanced visualization and maneuverability through the use of two independent portals, which allow for precise decompression, discectomy, and fusion procedures with minimal muscle disruption. Studies suggest that BE is well-suited for specific cases requiring delicate tissue handling and complex anatomical access. Studies report reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery compared to traditional methods. While challenges such as longer operation times and learning curves exist, BE offers a valuable alternative to other minimally invasive techniques in procedures like lumbar laminectomy, foraminotomy, and interbody fusion.

Conclusions: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery represents an important addition to the arsenal of minimally invasive spine techniques. Its flexibility and adaptability make it a promising option for specific spinal pathologies, particularly in cases where other techniques may pose limitations. Future research should focus on refining surgical protocols, enhancing training frameworks, and expanding the application of BE to other spinal regions and complex conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信