Hamzah Adwan, Lars Hammann, John Bielfeldt, Sven Becker, Thomas J Vogl
{"title":"经静脉肺化疗栓塞和微波消融治疗乳腺癌肺转移:倾向得分匹配分析。","authors":"Hamzah Adwan, Lars Hammann, John Bielfeldt, Sven Becker, Thomas J Vogl","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-01966-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcomes of patients with pulmonary metastases from breast cancer, who were treated with transvenous pulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE) and consecutive microwave ablation (MWA) with patients treated by TPCE alone.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included patients with unresectable and/or non-responsive to systemic chemotherapy pulmonary metastases originating from breast cancer, treated by TPCE followed by MWA, in case of adequate response to TPCE, or by TPCE alone. The groups of patients were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. After PSM, 23 patients were included in the combination therapy group (Group 1) and 42 patients were included in the monotherapy group (Group 2). The median overall survival (OS) time was 33.6 months for Group 1 with a 2-year OS rate of 62%, and 20.2 months for Group 2 with a 2-year OS rate of 43%. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding OS (p value: 0.429). The rate of progressive/recurrent disease was 17.4% (4/23) in Group 1 and 23.8% (10/42) in Group 2 (p value: 0.754). The number of metastases was the only significant factor for OS in all patients after PSM (p value: 0.032, HR: 1.016, 95% CI 1.001-1.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPCE is an effective potential treatment for lung metastases of breast cancer, which can be performed alone or combined with MWA. Patients who responded to TPCE and received subsequent MWA demonstrated non-significant better OS and local tumor control.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":"706-713"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transvenous pulmonary chemoembolization and microwave ablation for lung metastases from breast cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hamzah Adwan, Lars Hammann, John Bielfeldt, Sven Becker, Thomas J Vogl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-025-01966-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcomes of patients with pulmonary metastases from breast cancer, who were treated with transvenous pulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE) and consecutive microwave ablation (MWA) with patients treated by TPCE alone.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included patients with unresectable and/or non-responsive to systemic chemotherapy pulmonary metastases originating from breast cancer, treated by TPCE followed by MWA, in case of adequate response to TPCE, or by TPCE alone. The groups of patients were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. After PSM, 23 patients were included in the combination therapy group (Group 1) and 42 patients were included in the monotherapy group (Group 2). The median overall survival (OS) time was 33.6 months for Group 1 with a 2-year OS rate of 62%, and 20.2 months for Group 2 with a 2-year OS rate of 43%. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding OS (p value: 0.429). The rate of progressive/recurrent disease was 17.4% (4/23) in Group 1 and 23.8% (10/42) in Group 2 (p value: 0.754). The number of metastases was the only significant factor for OS in all patients after PSM (p value: 0.032, HR: 1.016, 95% CI 1.001-1.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPCE is an effective potential treatment for lung metastases of breast cancer, which can be performed alone or combined with MWA. Patients who responded to TPCE and received subsequent MWA demonstrated non-significant better OS and local tumor control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"706-713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-01966-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-01966-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较经静脉肺化疗栓塞(TPCE)联合连续微波消融(MWA)治疗乳腺癌肺转移患者与单纯TPCE治疗患者的预后。材料和方法:本回顾性单中心研究纳入了不可切除和/或对全身化疗无反应的乳腺癌肺转移患者,在对TPCE有足够反应的情况下,先接受TPCE治疗,再接受MWA治疗,或单独接受TPCE治疗。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)对患者组进行平衡。结果:共有97例患者符合本研究的纳入标准。PSM后,23例患者被纳入联合治疗组(1组),42例患者被纳入单药治疗组(2组)。1组的中位总生存期(OS)为33.6个月,2年OS率为62%,2组为20.2个月,2年OS率为43%。两组间OS差异无统计学意义(p值:0.429)。第1组进展/复发率为17.4%(4/23),第2组为23.8% (10/42)(p值:0.754)。转移数量是PSM后所有患者OS的唯一显著因素(p值:0.032,HR: 1.016, 95% CI 1.001-1.031)。结论:TPCE是治疗乳腺癌肺转移的一种有效的潜在治疗方法,可单独或联合MWA治疗。对TPCE有反应并接受后续MWA的患者表现出无明显改善的OS和局部肿瘤控制。
Transvenous pulmonary chemoembolization and microwave ablation for lung metastases from breast cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of patients with pulmonary metastases from breast cancer, who were treated with transvenous pulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE) and consecutive microwave ablation (MWA) with patients treated by TPCE alone.
Material and methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients with unresectable and/or non-responsive to systemic chemotherapy pulmonary metastases originating from breast cancer, treated by TPCE followed by MWA, in case of adequate response to TPCE, or by TPCE alone. The groups of patients were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: A total of 97 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. After PSM, 23 patients were included in the combination therapy group (Group 1) and 42 patients were included in the monotherapy group (Group 2). The median overall survival (OS) time was 33.6 months for Group 1 with a 2-year OS rate of 62%, and 20.2 months for Group 2 with a 2-year OS rate of 43%. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding OS (p value: 0.429). The rate of progressive/recurrent disease was 17.4% (4/23) in Group 1 and 23.8% (10/42) in Group 2 (p value: 0.754). The number of metastases was the only significant factor for OS in all patients after PSM (p value: 0.032, HR: 1.016, 95% CI 1.001-1.031).
Conclusion: TPCE is an effective potential treatment for lung metastases of breast cancer, which can be performed alone or combined with MWA. Patients who responded to TPCE and received subsequent MWA demonstrated non-significant better OS and local tumor control.
期刊介绍:
Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.