回家干预,以加强安全的医院到家庭的健康过渡:试点评估。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alicia I Arbaje, Yea-Jen Hsu, Sylvan Greyson, Kathryn H Bowles, Margaret V McDonald, Sasha Vergez, Katie Harbison, Nicole Williams, Dawn Hohl, Kimberly Carl, Ayse P Gurses, Jill A Marsteller, Bruce Leff
{"title":"回家干预,以加强安全的医院到家庭的健康过渡:试点评估。","authors":"Alicia I Arbaje, Yea-Jen Hsu, Sylvan Greyson, Kathryn H Bowles, Margaret V McDonald, Sasha Vergez, Katie Harbison, Nicole Williams, Dawn Hohl, Kimberly Carl, Ayse P Gurses, Jill A Marsteller, Bruce Leff","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care transitions from hospital to skilled home health care (HH) often pose safety risks, especially for older adults. The Coming Home Intervention (CHI) was developed to enhance these transitions based on the Hospital-to-Home Health Transition Quality (H3TQ) index, a previously validated survey instrument assessing quality issues during hospital-to-HH transitions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to pilot CHI and evaluate its impact at 2 large HH agencies in Baltimore, MD, and New York, NY.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2 participating HH agencies implement CHI by providing HH clinicians and patients tools for expectation setting, clarification of healthcare-related roles of family and HH personnel, clinical care guides to support information management, and the H3TQ for identification of quality/safety issues. Using a quasi-experimental, before-and-after difference-in-difference design, changes before and after CHI implementation were compared between intervention and comparison groups. Quality of hospital-to-HH transitions was rated by older adults/caregivers and HH clinicians using the H3TQ before and after CHI implementation. In total, 394 responses were from older adults/caregivers and 604 responses were from HH clinicians. Outcomes including identification of medication issues and 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization were evaluated using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set with a difference-in-difference approach (n = 3,471 in the Baltimore site; n = 758 in the New York City site). Results were analyzed and reported separately for each HH agency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CHI implementation in Baltimore was associated with a statistically non-significant, decreasing trend in 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval = 0.45-1.03). After implementation, older adults/caregivers rated quality issues measured by H3TQ less favorably. In New York City, older adults/caregivers reported fewer quality issues (incidence rate ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.89) after implementation. Assessment of other measures did not show significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pilot implementation of CHI demonstrated potential to improve hospital-to-HH transition quality. Study findings can guide future CHI implementation in larger studies in a broader population of older adults receiving HH services after hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Coming Home Intervention to Enhance Safe Hospital-to-Home Health Transitions: Pilot Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia I Arbaje, Yea-Jen Hsu, Sylvan Greyson, Kathryn H Bowles, Margaret V McDonald, Sasha Vergez, Katie Harbison, Nicole Williams, Dawn Hohl, Kimberly Carl, Ayse P Gurses, Jill A Marsteller, Bruce Leff\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care transitions from hospital to skilled home health care (HH) often pose safety risks, especially for older adults. The Coming Home Intervention (CHI) was developed to enhance these transitions based on the Hospital-to-Home Health Transition Quality (H3TQ) index, a previously validated survey instrument assessing quality issues during hospital-to-HH transitions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to pilot CHI and evaluate its impact at 2 large HH agencies in Baltimore, MD, and New York, NY.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2 participating HH agencies implement CHI by providing HH clinicians and patients tools for expectation setting, clarification of healthcare-related roles of family and HH personnel, clinical care guides to support information management, and the H3TQ for identification of quality/safety issues. Using a quasi-experimental, before-and-after difference-in-difference design, changes before and after CHI implementation were compared between intervention and comparison groups. Quality of hospital-to-HH transitions was rated by older adults/caregivers and HH clinicians using the H3TQ before and after CHI implementation. In total, 394 responses were from older adults/caregivers and 604 responses were from HH clinicians. Outcomes including identification of medication issues and 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization were evaluated using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set with a difference-in-difference approach (n = 3,471 in the Baltimore site; n = 758 in the New York City site). Results were analyzed and reported separately for each HH agency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CHI implementation in Baltimore was associated with a statistically non-significant, decreasing trend in 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval = 0.45-1.03). After implementation, older adults/caregivers rated quality issues measured by H3TQ less favorably. In New York City, older adults/caregivers reported fewer quality issues (incidence rate ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.89) after implementation. Assessment of other measures did not show significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pilot implementation of CHI demonstrated potential to improve hospital-to-HH transition quality. Study findings can guide future CHI implementation in larger studies in a broader population of older adults receiving HH services after hospital discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Management in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Management in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理从医院过渡到熟练的家庭卫生保健(HH)往往会带来安全风险,特别是对老年人。“回家干预”(CHI)是根据医院到家庭的健康过渡质量(H3TQ)指数开发的,H3TQ指数是一种先前经过验证的调查工具,用于评估医院到家庭健康过渡期间的质量问题。目的:本研究旨在试点CHI并评估其在马里兰州巴尔的摩和纽约州纽约两家大型医疗机构的影响。方法:两家参与的卫生保健机构通过为卫生保健临床医生和患者提供期望设定工具、澄清家庭和卫生保健人员的卫生保健相关角色、临床护理指南以支持信息管理、以及H3TQ以识别质量/安全问题来实施CHI。采用准实验、前后差中差设计,比较干预组和对照组实施CHI前后的变化。老年人/护理人员和HH临床医生在实施CHI之前和之后使用H3TQ对医院到HH过渡的质量进行评估。总共有394份回复来自老年人/护理人员,604份回复来自HH临床医生。结果包括药物问题的识别和30天急诊科使用或再住院,使用差异中差异方法的结果和评估信息集进行评估(n = 3,471在巴尔的摩站点;纽约市的n = 758)。对每个HH机构的结果分别进行分析和报告。结果:巴尔的摩实施CHI与30天急诊科使用或再住院的下降趋势相关,统计学上不显著(优势比= 0.68,95%可信区间= 0.45-1.03)。实施后,老年人/照顾者对H3TQ测量的质量问题的评价不太好。在纽约市,老年人/护理人员在实施后报告的质量问题较少(发病率比= 0.50,95%可信区间= 0.27-0.89)。对其他措施的评估没有显示出明显的变化。结论:CHI的试点实施显示了提高医院到医院过渡质量的潜力。研究结果可以指导未来在更广泛的老年人出院后接受HH服务的更大规模的研究中实施CHI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Coming Home Intervention to Enhance Safe Hospital-to-Home Health Transitions: Pilot Evaluation.

Background: Care transitions from hospital to skilled home health care (HH) often pose safety risks, especially for older adults. The Coming Home Intervention (CHI) was developed to enhance these transitions based on the Hospital-to-Home Health Transition Quality (H3TQ) index, a previously validated survey instrument assessing quality issues during hospital-to-HH transitions.

Objectives: This study aimed to pilot CHI and evaluate its impact at 2 large HH agencies in Baltimore, MD, and New York, NY.

Methods: The 2 participating HH agencies implement CHI by providing HH clinicians and patients tools for expectation setting, clarification of healthcare-related roles of family and HH personnel, clinical care guides to support information management, and the H3TQ for identification of quality/safety issues. Using a quasi-experimental, before-and-after difference-in-difference design, changes before and after CHI implementation were compared between intervention and comparison groups. Quality of hospital-to-HH transitions was rated by older adults/caregivers and HH clinicians using the H3TQ before and after CHI implementation. In total, 394 responses were from older adults/caregivers and 604 responses were from HH clinicians. Outcomes including identification of medication issues and 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization were evaluated using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set with a difference-in-difference approach (n = 3,471 in the Baltimore site; n = 758 in the New York City site). Results were analyzed and reported separately for each HH agency.

Results: CHI implementation in Baltimore was associated with a statistically non-significant, decreasing trend in 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval = 0.45-1.03). After implementation, older adults/caregivers rated quality issues measured by H3TQ less favorably. In New York City, older adults/caregivers reported fewer quality issues (incidence rate ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.89) after implementation. Assessment of other measures did not show significant changes.

Conclusion: The pilot implementation of CHI demonstrated potential to improve hospital-to-HH transition quality. Study findings can guide future CHI implementation in larger studies in a broader population of older adults receiving HH services after hospital discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信