从病史事件预测中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤的风险

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Quality Management in Health Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497
Aaron J Hill
{"title":"从病史事件预测中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤的风险","authors":"Aaron J Hill","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are the second leading cause of cancer death among males aged 39 years and younger, and the leading cause of cancer death among males and females younger than 20. There are few widely accepted predictors and a lack of United States Preventive Services Taskforce recommendations for MBT. This study examined how medical history could be used to assess the risk of MBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using over 400,000 patients' medical histories, including nearly 1,800 with MBT, Logistic Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to predict MBT. More than 25,000 diagnoses were grouped into 16 body systems, plus pairwise and triple combinations, as well as indicators for missing values. Data were split into 80/20 training and validation sets with fit and accuracy assessed using McFadden's R2 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnoses of the endocrine, nervous, and lymphatic systems consistently showed greater than three times more association with MBT. The best performing model at an AUC of 0.83 consisted of 14 body system diagnosis groups and pairwise interactions among groups, in addition to demographic, social determinant of health, death, and six missing diagnosis grouping indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated how large data models can predict MBT in patients using EHR data. With the lack of preventive screening guidelines and known risk factors associated with MBT, predictive models provide a universal, non-invasive, and inexpensive method of identifying at-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"149-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Risk of Malignant CNS Tumors From Medical History Events.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron J Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are the second leading cause of cancer death among males aged 39 years and younger, and the leading cause of cancer death among males and females younger than 20. There are few widely accepted predictors and a lack of United States Preventive Services Taskforce recommendations for MBT. This study examined how medical history could be used to assess the risk of MBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using over 400,000 patients' medical histories, including nearly 1,800 with MBT, Logistic Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to predict MBT. More than 25,000 diagnoses were grouped into 16 body systems, plus pairwise and triple combinations, as well as indicators for missing values. Data were split into 80/20 training and validation sets with fit and accuracy assessed using McFadden's R2 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnoses of the endocrine, nervous, and lymphatic systems consistently showed greater than three times more association with MBT. The best performing model at an AUC of 0.83 consisted of 14 body system diagnosis groups and pairwise interactions among groups, in addition to demographic, social determinant of health, death, and six missing diagnosis grouping indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated how large data models can predict MBT in patients using EHR data. With the lack of preventive screening guidelines and known risk factors associated with MBT, predictive models provide a universal, non-invasive, and inexpensive method of identifying at-risk patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Management in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"149-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Management in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:恶性脑和其他中枢神经系统肿瘤(MBT)是39岁及以下男性癌症死亡的第二大原因,也是20岁以下男性和女性癌症死亡的主要原因。很少有被广泛接受的预测因素,并且缺乏美国预防服务工作组对MBT的建议。本研究探讨了如何利用病史来评估MBT的风险。方法:采用Logistic最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归预测40多万例患者的病史,其中近1800例患者患有MBT。超过25,000个诊断结果被分为16个身体系统,加上成对和三重组合,以及缺失值的指标。将数据分成80/20个训练集和验证集,使用麦克法登R2和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估拟合和准确性。结果:内分泌、神经和淋巴系统的诊断一致显示与MBT的相关性大于3倍。除人口统计学、健康、死亡的社会决定因素和6个缺失诊断组指标外,AUC为0.83的最佳模型包括14个身体系统诊断组和组间的两两相互作用。结论:本研究证明了大数据模型如何利用电子病历数据预测患者的MBT。由于缺乏预防性筛查指南和已知的与MBT相关的危险因素,预测模型提供了一种通用的、非侵入性的、廉价的识别高危患者的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Risk of Malignant CNS Tumors From Medical History Events.

Background and objectives: Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are the second leading cause of cancer death among males aged 39 years and younger, and the leading cause of cancer death among males and females younger than 20. There are few widely accepted predictors and a lack of United States Preventive Services Taskforce recommendations for MBT. This study examined how medical history could be used to assess the risk of MBT.

Methods: Using over 400,000 patients' medical histories, including nearly 1,800 with MBT, Logistic Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to predict MBT. More than 25,000 diagnoses were grouped into 16 body systems, plus pairwise and triple combinations, as well as indicators for missing values. Data were split into 80/20 training and validation sets with fit and accuracy assessed using McFadden's R2 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: Diagnoses of the endocrine, nervous, and lymphatic systems consistently showed greater than three times more association with MBT. The best performing model at an AUC of 0.83 consisted of 14 body system diagnosis groups and pairwise interactions among groups, in addition to demographic, social determinant of health, death, and six missing diagnosis grouping indicators.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated how large data models can predict MBT in patients using EHR data. With the lack of preventive screening guidelines and known risk factors associated with MBT, predictive models provide a universal, non-invasive, and inexpensive method of identifying at-risk patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信