Richard Furie, Jürgen Steffgen, Nora Fagan, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Yingyos Avihingsanon, Dimitrios T Boumpas, Kajohnsak Noppakun, Jing Wu, Ivette Revollo, David R Jayne
{"title":"活动性狼疮肾炎患者使用 BI 655064(一种拮抗剂抗 CD40 抗体)两年的治疗经验:一项探索性 II 期维持试验。","authors":"Richard Furie, Jürgen Steffgen, Nora Fagan, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Yingyos Avihingsanon, Dimitrios T Boumpas, Kajohnsak Noppakun, Jing Wu, Ivette Revollo, David R Jayne","doi":"10.1177/09612033251326990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of different doses of BI 655064 versus placebo added to standard of care during maintenance treatment for lupus nephritis (LN).Methods1293.13 was an exploratory, phase II maintenance trial. Patients were eligible for entry if they had completed 1 year of randomised treatment with BI 655064 (120, 180 or 240 mg) or placebo in the 1293.10 trial, responded to treatment at Year 1 (complete renal response [CRR], partial renal response or urinary protein/creatinine ratio ≤1) and consented to continue treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with CRR without renal flares at Year 2. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) scores and safety/tolerability.Results69/121 patients (57.0%) from the 1293.10 trial entered 1293.13. The adjusted proportion of patients with CRR decreased in all groups between Year 1 (BI 655064: 53.4%-72.7%; placebo: 71.4%) and Year 2 (BI 655064: 48.2%-59.5%; placebo: 57.5%). At Year 2, mean decreases in total SELENA-SLEDAI scores were greatest with BI 655064 240 mg (-10.6 points), followed by 120 mg (-8.9 points), 180 mg (-7.2 points) and placebo (-5.3 points). SELENA-SLEDAI non-renal scores decreased at Year 1 (BI 655064: -3.0 to -3.4; placebo: -1.8); this pattern remained with BI 655064 during Year 2 (-2.4 to -4.1), whereas placebo returned to near-baseline scores (-0.4). Over 2 years of treatment, almost all patients (97.1%) experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE). Compared with the other groups, higher rates of serious AEs (42.9% vs 23.1%-33.3%)-mainly driven by serious infections (23.8% vs 7.7%-14.3%)-and severe AEs (47.6% vs 13.3%-28.6%) were reported with BI 655064 240 mg.ConclusionsThis exploratory, phase II maintenance trial failed to demonstrate the benefits of BI 655064 on renal outcomes in the treatment of LN. However, some benefits in total and non-renal SELENA-SLEDAI scores were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"460-473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-year treatment experience with BI 655064, an antagonistic anti-CD40 antibody, in patients with active lupus nephritis: An exploratory, phase II maintenance trial.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Furie, Jürgen Steffgen, Nora Fagan, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Yingyos Avihingsanon, Dimitrios T Boumpas, Kajohnsak Noppakun, Jing Wu, Ivette Revollo, David R Jayne\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09612033251326990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of different doses of BI 655064 versus placebo added to standard of care during maintenance treatment for lupus nephritis (LN).Methods1293.13 was an exploratory, phase II maintenance trial. Patients were eligible for entry if they had completed 1 year of randomised treatment with BI 655064 (120, 180 or 240 mg) or placebo in the 1293.10 trial, responded to treatment at Year 1 (complete renal response [CRR], partial renal response or urinary protein/creatinine ratio ≤1) and consented to continue treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with CRR without renal flares at Year 2. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) scores and safety/tolerability.Results69/121 patients (57.0%) from the 1293.10 trial entered 1293.13. The adjusted proportion of patients with CRR decreased in all groups between Year 1 (BI 655064: 53.4%-72.7%; placebo: 71.4%) and Year 2 (BI 655064: 48.2%-59.5%; placebo: 57.5%). At Year 2, mean decreases in total SELENA-SLEDAI scores were greatest with BI 655064 240 mg (-10.6 points), followed by 120 mg (-8.9 points), 180 mg (-7.2 points) and placebo (-5.3 points). SELENA-SLEDAI non-renal scores decreased at Year 1 (BI 655064: -3.0 to -3.4; placebo: -1.8); this pattern remained with BI 655064 during Year 2 (-2.4 to -4.1), whereas placebo returned to near-baseline scores (-0.4). Over 2 years of treatment, almost all patients (97.1%) experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE). Compared with the other groups, higher rates of serious AEs (42.9% vs 23.1%-33.3%)-mainly driven by serious infections (23.8% vs 7.7%-14.3%)-and severe AEs (47.6% vs 13.3%-28.6%) were reported with BI 655064 240 mg.ConclusionsThis exploratory, phase II maintenance trial failed to demonstrate the benefits of BI 655064 on renal outcomes in the treatment of LN. However, some benefits in total and non-renal SELENA-SLEDAI scores were observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"460-473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008471/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251326990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251326990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评价不同剂量BI 655064与标准护理中添加安慰剂在狼疮肾炎(LN)维持治疗中的长期疗效和安全性。方法1293.13是一项探索性II期维持试验。如果患者在1293.10试验中完成了1年的BI 655064(120,180或240mg)或安慰剂随机治疗,在第1年对治疗有反应(完全肾反应[CRR],部分肾反应或尿蛋白/肌酐比值≤1)并同意继续治疗,则符合入组资格。主要终点是第2年无肾耀斑的CRR患者的比例。次要终点包括从基线开始的红斑狼疮雌激素安全性国家评估-系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SELENA-SLEDAI)评分和安全性/耐受性的变化。结果121例患者中有69例(57.0%)从1293.10试验进入1293.13。在第1年期间,所有组CRR患者的调整比例均有所下降(BI 655064: 53.4%-72.7%;安慰剂:71.4%)和第二年(BI 655064: 48.2%-59.5%;安慰剂:57.5%)。在第2年,bi655064 240 mg(-10.6分)的SELENA-SLEDAI总分平均下降幅度最大,其次是120 mg(-8.9分)、180 mg(-7.2分)和安慰剂(-5.3分)。SELENA-SLEDAI非肾脏评分在第一年下降(BI 655064: -3.0至-3.4;安慰剂:-1.8);BI 655064组在第2年仍保持这种模式(-2.4至-4.1),而安慰剂组则恢复到接近基线的评分(-0.4)。在2年的治疗中,几乎所有患者(97.1%)出现≥1次不良事件(AE)。与其他组相比,BI 655064 240 mg组报告的严重ae发生率(42.9% vs 23.1%-33.3%)和严重ae发生率(47.6% vs 13.3%-28.6%)较高,主要由严重感染引起(23.8% vs 7.7%-14.3%)。这项探索性II期维持试验未能证明BI 655064在治疗LN时对肾脏预后的益处。然而,总的和非肾性SELENA-SLEDAI评分有一些益处。
Two-year treatment experience with BI 655064, an antagonistic anti-CD40 antibody, in patients with active lupus nephritis: An exploratory, phase II maintenance trial.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of different doses of BI 655064 versus placebo added to standard of care during maintenance treatment for lupus nephritis (LN).Methods1293.13 was an exploratory, phase II maintenance trial. Patients were eligible for entry if they had completed 1 year of randomised treatment with BI 655064 (120, 180 or 240 mg) or placebo in the 1293.10 trial, responded to treatment at Year 1 (complete renal response [CRR], partial renal response or urinary protein/creatinine ratio ≤1) and consented to continue treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with CRR without renal flares at Year 2. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) scores and safety/tolerability.Results69/121 patients (57.0%) from the 1293.10 trial entered 1293.13. The adjusted proportion of patients with CRR decreased in all groups between Year 1 (BI 655064: 53.4%-72.7%; placebo: 71.4%) and Year 2 (BI 655064: 48.2%-59.5%; placebo: 57.5%). At Year 2, mean decreases in total SELENA-SLEDAI scores were greatest with BI 655064 240 mg (-10.6 points), followed by 120 mg (-8.9 points), 180 mg (-7.2 points) and placebo (-5.3 points). SELENA-SLEDAI non-renal scores decreased at Year 1 (BI 655064: -3.0 to -3.4; placebo: -1.8); this pattern remained with BI 655064 during Year 2 (-2.4 to -4.1), whereas placebo returned to near-baseline scores (-0.4). Over 2 years of treatment, almost all patients (97.1%) experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE). Compared with the other groups, higher rates of serious AEs (42.9% vs 23.1%-33.3%)-mainly driven by serious infections (23.8% vs 7.7%-14.3%)-and severe AEs (47.6% vs 13.3%-28.6%) were reported with BI 655064 240 mg.ConclusionsThis exploratory, phase II maintenance trial failed to demonstrate the benefits of BI 655064 on renal outcomes in the treatment of LN. However, some benefits in total and non-renal SELENA-SLEDAI scores were observed.
期刊介绍:
The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…