中等强度间歇训练可提高训练有素的自行车运动员的耐力表现。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Knut Sindre Mølmen, Ingvill Odden, Margit Dahl Sørensen, Anne Mette Rustaden, Daniel Hammarström, Joar Hansen, Håvard Nygaard, Håvard Hamarsland, Bent R Rønnestad
{"title":"中等强度间歇训练可提高训练有素的自行车运动员的耐力表现。","authors":"Knut Sindre Mølmen, Ingvill Odden, Margit Dahl Sørensen, Anne Mette Rustaden, Daniel Hammarström, Joar Hansen, Håvard Nygaard, Håvard Hamarsland, Bent R Rønnestad","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the physiological effects of a moderate-intensity interval training (MIT) microcycle followed by an active recovery period (collectively termed MITblock) with a time-matched regular training period (REG) during the general preparation phase in well-trained cyclists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a randomized crossover design, 30 well-trained male cyclists (maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), 70.5 (4.6) mL·min-1·kg-1) completed both MITblock and REG. The MIT microcycle involved six interval sessions over seven days with 5-7 × 10-14 min work intervals at a perceived exertion (RPE) of 14-15 on the Borg 6-20 scale. A six-day active recovery period followed before physiological testing. During REG, cyclists performed their regular preparatory-phase training routine, which primarily involved low-intensity exercise. Specific guidelines included completing either two MIT sessions or one MIT session and one high-intensity interval session per week. Endurance performance indicators assessed included changes in 15 min maximal average power output (PO15min), power output at 4 mmol·L-1 [blood lactate] (PO4mmol), 1 min peak power output during incremental testing (POVO2max), and VO2max.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the Training Impulse (TRIMP) score was not different between MITblock and REG (1944 (436) vs. 1800 (232), respectively; p = 0.27), MITblock resulted in significantly greater improvements than REG in PO4mmol (4.0 (4.4)% vs. -1.3 (3.7)%, p < 0.01), POVO2max (2.5 (4.5)% vs. -0.7 (3.9)%, p < 0.01) and VO2max (2.0 (3.9)% vs. 0.0 (3.5)%, p = 0.05). Changes in PO15min were not statistically different between MITblock and REG (3.9 (8.3)% vs. 0.2 (6.8)%, p = 0.14). During MIT intervals, RPE was 14.4 (0.3), corresponding to 66 (5)% of POVO2max, 85 (3)% of maximal heart rate, and 2.8 (1.1) mmol·L-1 [blood lactate].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Six moderate-intensity interval sessions over seven days, followed by a six-day active recovery period, induce improvements in endurance performance indicators compared to a time-matched regular training period in well-trained cyclists.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Moderate-Intensity Interval Training Block Improves Endurance Performance in Well-Trained Cyclists.\",\"authors\":\"Knut Sindre Mølmen, Ingvill Odden, Margit Dahl Sørensen, Anne Mette Rustaden, Daniel Hammarström, Joar Hansen, Håvard Nygaard, Håvard Hamarsland, Bent R Rønnestad\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the physiological effects of a moderate-intensity interval training (MIT) microcycle followed by an active recovery period (collectively termed MITblock) with a time-matched regular training period (REG) during the general preparation phase in well-trained cyclists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a randomized crossover design, 30 well-trained male cyclists (maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), 70.5 (4.6) mL·min-1·kg-1) completed both MITblock and REG. The MIT microcycle involved six interval sessions over seven days with 5-7 × 10-14 min work intervals at a perceived exertion (RPE) of 14-15 on the Borg 6-20 scale. A six-day active recovery period followed before physiological testing. During REG, cyclists performed their regular preparatory-phase training routine, which primarily involved low-intensity exercise. Specific guidelines included completing either two MIT sessions or one MIT session and one high-intensity interval session per week. Endurance performance indicators assessed included changes in 15 min maximal average power output (PO15min), power output at 4 mmol·L-1 [blood lactate] (PO4mmol), 1 min peak power output during incremental testing (POVO2max), and VO2max.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the Training Impulse (TRIMP) score was not different between MITblock and REG (1944 (436) vs. 1800 (232), respectively; p = 0.27), MITblock resulted in significantly greater improvements than REG in PO4mmol (4.0 (4.4)% vs. -1.3 (3.7)%, p < 0.01), POVO2max (2.5 (4.5)% vs. -0.7 (3.9)%, p < 0.01) and VO2max (2.0 (3.9)% vs. 0.0 (3.5)%, p = 0.05). Changes in PO15min were not statistically different between MITblock and REG (3.9 (8.3)% vs. 0.2 (6.8)%, p = 0.14). During MIT intervals, RPE was 14.4 (0.3), corresponding to 66 (5)% of POVO2max, 85 (3)% of maximal heart rate, and 2.8 (1.1) mmol·L-1 [blood lactate].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Six moderate-intensity interval sessions over seven days, followed by a six-day active recovery period, induce improvements in endurance performance indicators compared to a time-matched regular training period in well-trained cyclists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003706\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了中等强度间歇训练(MIT)微周期后的积极恢复期(统称为MITblock)与训练有素的自行车运动员在一般准备阶段的时间匹配常规训练期(REG)的生理效果。方法:采用随机交叉设计,30名训练有素的男性自行车运动员(最大耗氧量(VO2max)为70.5 (4.6)mL·min-1·kg-1)完成MITblock和REG。MIT微周期包括6次间隔,为期7天,每次5-7 × 10-14分钟的工作间隔,RPE在Borg 6-20量表上为14-15。生理测试前有6天的积极恢复期。在REG期间,骑自行车者进行常规的准备阶段训练,主要包括低强度运动。具体的指导方针包括每周完成两次麻省理工学院课程或一次麻省理工学院课程和一次高强度间歇课程。评估的耐力性能指标包括15分钟最大平均功率输出(PO15min)、4mmol·L-1[血乳酸]功率输出(PO4mmol)、增量测试时1分钟峰值功率输出(POVO2max)和VO2max的变化。结果:虽然MITblock和REG的训练冲动(TRIMP)评分在1944(436)和1800(232)之间没有差异;p = 0.27), MITblock对PO4mmol(4.0(4.4)%比-1.3 (3.7)%,p < 0.01)、POVO2max(2.5(4.5)%比-0.7 (3.9)%,p < 0.01)和VO2max(2.0(3.9)%比0.0 (3.5)%,p = 0.05)的改善显著高于REG。MITblock和REG组PO15min的变化无统计学差异(3.9 (8.3)% vs. 0.2 (6.8)%, p = 0.14)。在MIT间歇期,RPE为14.4(0.3),对应于POVO2max的66(5)%,最大心率的85(3)%和2.8 (1.1)mmol·L-1[血乳酸]。结论:在7天内进行6次中等强度间歇训练,然后进行6天的积极恢复期,与训练有素的自行车运动员进行时间匹配的常规训练期相比,耐力表现指标得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Moderate-Intensity Interval Training Block Improves Endurance Performance in Well-Trained Cyclists.

Purpose: This study compared the physiological effects of a moderate-intensity interval training (MIT) microcycle followed by an active recovery period (collectively termed MITblock) with a time-matched regular training period (REG) during the general preparation phase in well-trained cyclists.

Methods: Using a randomized crossover design, 30 well-trained male cyclists (maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), 70.5 (4.6) mL·min-1·kg-1) completed both MITblock and REG. The MIT microcycle involved six interval sessions over seven days with 5-7 × 10-14 min work intervals at a perceived exertion (RPE) of 14-15 on the Borg 6-20 scale. A six-day active recovery period followed before physiological testing. During REG, cyclists performed their regular preparatory-phase training routine, which primarily involved low-intensity exercise. Specific guidelines included completing either two MIT sessions or one MIT session and one high-intensity interval session per week. Endurance performance indicators assessed included changes in 15 min maximal average power output (PO15min), power output at 4 mmol·L-1 [blood lactate] (PO4mmol), 1 min peak power output during incremental testing (POVO2max), and VO2max.

Results: Although the Training Impulse (TRIMP) score was not different between MITblock and REG (1944 (436) vs. 1800 (232), respectively; p = 0.27), MITblock resulted in significantly greater improvements than REG in PO4mmol (4.0 (4.4)% vs. -1.3 (3.7)%, p < 0.01), POVO2max (2.5 (4.5)% vs. -0.7 (3.9)%, p < 0.01) and VO2max (2.0 (3.9)% vs. 0.0 (3.5)%, p = 0.05). Changes in PO15min were not statistically different between MITblock and REG (3.9 (8.3)% vs. 0.2 (6.8)%, p = 0.14). During MIT intervals, RPE was 14.4 (0.3), corresponding to 66 (5)% of POVO2max, 85 (3)% of maximal heart rate, and 2.8 (1.1) mmol·L-1 [blood lactate].

Conclusions: Six moderate-intensity interval sessions over seven days, followed by a six-day active recovery period, induce improvements in endurance performance indicators compared to a time-matched regular training period in well-trained cyclists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信