评估LYR-220莫米松鼻窦植入物在慢性鼻窦炎和既往筛窦手术患者中的应用:来自随机、盲法、对照BEACON 2期研究的结果

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Brent A Senior, Randall A Ow, M Scott Major, Stacey L Silvers, Jeffrey S Rosenbloom, Amber U Luong, Zachary M Soler, Robert Naclerio, Robert C Kern, Lindsay Brayton, Marina Mihova, Ela Sajjadi, Misun Lee, Vineeta Belanger, Richard Nieman
{"title":"评估LYR-220莫米松鼻窦植入物在慢性鼻窦炎和既往筛窦手术患者中的应用:来自随机、盲法、对照BEACON 2期研究的结果","authors":"Brent A Senior, Randall A Ow, M Scott Major, Stacey L Silvers, Jeffrey S Rosenbloom, Amber U Luong, Zachary M Soler, Robert Naclerio, Robert C Kern, Lindsay Brayton, Marina Mihova, Ela Sajjadi, Misun Lee, Vineeta Belanger, Richard Nieman","doi":"10.1002/alr.23567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) often fails to directly manage the underlying inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), resulting in symptom recurrence in a significant number of patients. LYR-220 is a long-acting (24-week) corticosteroid sinonasal implant being developed for treatment of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two adults with CRS and prior ESS were enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, controlled Phase 2 (BEACON) study. Patients received LYR-220 or a sham procedure bilaterally. The primary endpoint was occurrence of any treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline (CFBL) in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22); three cardinal symptoms (3CS) of CRS (nasal blockage, nasal discharge, and facial pain/pressure); loss-of-smell; ethmoid percent opacification volume; and need for rescue treatment (systemic corticosteroids [SCS] or sinonasal surgery).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No SAEs were reported in the study. SNOT-22 scores significantly improved with LYR-220 versus sham from week 2 onwards, with a between group difference of -16.8 at Week 24 (p = 0.007). Between group difference at Week 24 for 3CS was -1.50 (p = 0.02) and for ethmoid percent opacification volume was -8.14 (p = 0.035). Five patients from LYR-220 group and seven from sham group used SCS. LYR-220 showed improvement versus sham in the loss-of-smell from Week 8 through the end of treatment at 24 weeks (-0.87, p = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BEACON study demonstrated safety, efficacy, feasibility, and tolerability of LYR-220 in patients with CRS who have had prior ESS. The primary endpoint was met, with no SAEs reported. LYR-220 demonstrated statistically significant, clinically relevant improvements in key symptomatic and objective efficacy endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"e23567"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of LYR-220 Mometasone Sinonasal Implants in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Prior Ethmoid Surgery: Results From the Randomized, Blinded, Controlled BEACON Phase 2 Study.\",\"authors\":\"Brent A Senior, Randall A Ow, M Scott Major, Stacey L Silvers, Jeffrey S Rosenbloom, Amber U Luong, Zachary M Soler, Robert Naclerio, Robert C Kern, Lindsay Brayton, Marina Mihova, Ela Sajjadi, Misun Lee, Vineeta Belanger, Richard Nieman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alr.23567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) often fails to directly manage the underlying inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), resulting in symptom recurrence in a significant number of patients. LYR-220 is a long-acting (24-week) corticosteroid sinonasal implant being developed for treatment of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two adults with CRS and prior ESS were enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, controlled Phase 2 (BEACON) study. Patients received LYR-220 or a sham procedure bilaterally. The primary endpoint was occurrence of any treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline (CFBL) in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22); three cardinal symptoms (3CS) of CRS (nasal blockage, nasal discharge, and facial pain/pressure); loss-of-smell; ethmoid percent opacification volume; and need for rescue treatment (systemic corticosteroids [SCS] or sinonasal surgery).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No SAEs were reported in the study. SNOT-22 scores significantly improved with LYR-220 versus sham from week 2 onwards, with a between group difference of -16.8 at Week 24 (p = 0.007). Between group difference at Week 24 for 3CS was -1.50 (p = 0.02) and for ethmoid percent opacification volume was -8.14 (p = 0.035). Five patients from LYR-220 group and seven from sham group used SCS. LYR-220 showed improvement versus sham in the loss-of-smell from Week 8 through the end of treatment at 24 weeks (-0.87, p = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BEACON study demonstrated safety, efficacy, feasibility, and tolerability of LYR-220 in patients with CRS who have had prior ESS. The primary endpoint was met, with no SAEs reported. LYR-220 demonstrated statistically significant, clinically relevant improvements in key symptomatic and objective efficacy endpoints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e23567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23567\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)往往不能直接控制慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的潜在炎症,导致相当数量的患者症状复发。LYR-220是一种长效(24周)皮质类固醇鼻腔植入物,正在开发用于治疗这些患者。方法:42名患有CRS和既往ESS的成年人加入了多中心、随机、对照2期(BEACON)研究。患者接受LYR-220或双侧假手术。主要终点是任何与治疗相关的严重不良事件(sae)的发生。疗效终点包括鼻结果试验(SNOT-22)的基线变化(CFBL);CRS的三个主要症状(3CS)(鼻塞、流鼻水和面部疼痛/压力);loss-of-smell;筛浊率;需要抢救治疗(全身皮质类固醇[SCS]或鼻窦手术)。结果:本研究未发现急性呼吸道感染。从第2周开始,LYR-220组与sham组相比,SNOT-22评分显著提高,第24周组间差异为-16.8 (p = 0.007)。第24周3CS组间差异为-1.50 (p = 0.02),筛样混浊体积百分比为-8.14 (p = 0.035)。LYR-220组5例,假手术组7例。从第8周到第24周治疗结束,LYR-220在嗅觉丧失方面比sham有所改善(-0.87,p = 0.026)。结论:BEACON研究证明了LYR-220治疗有ESS病史的CRS患者的安全性、有效性、可行性和耐受性。主要终点达到,无不良反应报告。LYR-220在关键症状和客观疗效终点上表现出统计学上显著的临床相关改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of LYR-220 Mometasone Sinonasal Implants in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Prior Ethmoid Surgery: Results From the Randomized, Blinded, Controlled BEACON Phase 2 Study.

Background: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) often fails to directly manage the underlying inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), resulting in symptom recurrence in a significant number of patients. LYR-220 is a long-acting (24-week) corticosteroid sinonasal implant being developed for treatment of these patients.

Methods: Forty-two adults with CRS and prior ESS were enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, controlled Phase 2 (BEACON) study. Patients received LYR-220 or a sham procedure bilaterally. The primary endpoint was occurrence of any treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline (CFBL) in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22); three cardinal symptoms (3CS) of CRS (nasal blockage, nasal discharge, and facial pain/pressure); loss-of-smell; ethmoid percent opacification volume; and need for rescue treatment (systemic corticosteroids [SCS] or sinonasal surgery).

Results: No SAEs were reported in the study. SNOT-22 scores significantly improved with LYR-220 versus sham from week 2 onwards, with a between group difference of -16.8 at Week 24 (p = 0.007). Between group difference at Week 24 for 3CS was -1.50 (p = 0.02) and for ethmoid percent opacification volume was -8.14 (p = 0.035). Five patients from LYR-220 group and seven from sham group used SCS. LYR-220 showed improvement versus sham in the loss-of-smell from Week 8 through the end of treatment at 24 weeks (-0.87, p = 0.026).

Conclusions: The BEACON study demonstrated safety, efficacy, feasibility, and tolerability of LYR-220 in patients with CRS who have had prior ESS. The primary endpoint was met, with no SAEs reported. LYR-220 demonstrated statistically significant, clinically relevant improvements in key symptomatic and objective efficacy endpoints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信