Martina Rauscher, Zeb Youard, Alice Faccin, Sanjay S Patel, Hang Pang, Olaf Zent
{"title":"意外接触四价登革热减毒活疫苗 TAK-003 后的妊娠结局。","authors":"Martina Rauscher, Zeb Youard, Alice Faccin, Sanjay S Patel, Hang Pang, Olaf Zent","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2480297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The tetravalent dengue vaccine TAK-003 is contraindicated during pregnancy. Pregnant women were excluded from TAK-003 clinical studies; however, some pregnancies occurred unintentionally.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This post-hoc analysis of phase 2 and 3 studies, evaluated pregnancy outcomes and neonatal adverse events (AEs) following unintentional vaccination during the time period ('exposure window') when women could be pregnant (within 44 days before last menstrual period until the outcome of pregnancy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 557 reported pregnancies, 38 (TAK-003, <i>n</i> = 28/375; placebo, <i>n</i> = 10/182) occurred inside the exposure window. Of these, 28 (TAK-003, <i>n</i> = 23; placebo, <i>n</i> = 5) resulted in live births, four resulted in elective terminations (TAK-003, <i>n</i> = 2; placebo, <i>n</i> = 2), five in spontaneous abortions (TAK-003, <i>n</i> = 3; placebo, <i>n</i> = 2) and one unknown outcome (placebo).Of the spontaneous abortions, there was no significant difference between TAK-003 and placebo recipients, or between those occurring within or outside the exposure window. Six participants who received TAK-003 in the exposure window and two neonates experienced serious AEs; none were considered TAK-003 related.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This post-hoc analysis found no evidence of increased adverse pregnancy outcomes following unintentional TAK-003 vaccination occurring inside the exposure window compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The clinical trials from which data were extracted are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifiers are NCT02193087, NCT01511250, NCT02302066, NCT02425098, NCT03746015, NCT02747927, NCT03999996, NCT03423173, NCT03342898, NCT03771963, NCT04313244, NCT02948829, NCT035252119, NCT03341637).</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnancy outcomes following unintentional exposure to TAK-003, a live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine.\",\"authors\":\"Martina Rauscher, Zeb Youard, Alice Faccin, Sanjay S Patel, Hang Pang, Olaf Zent\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14760584.2025.2480297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The tetravalent dengue vaccine TAK-003 is contraindicated during pregnancy. Pregnant women were excluded from TAK-003 clinical studies; however, some pregnancies occurred unintentionally.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This post-hoc analysis of phase 2 and 3 studies, evaluated pregnancy outcomes and neonatal adverse events (AEs) following unintentional vaccination during the time period ('exposure window') when women could be pregnant (within 44 days before last menstrual period until the outcome of pregnancy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 557 reported pregnancies, 38 (TAK-003, <i>n</i> = 28/375; placebo, <i>n</i> = 10/182) occurred inside the exposure window. Of these, 28 (TAK-003, <i>n</i> = 23; placebo, <i>n</i> = 5) resulted in live births, four resulted in elective terminations (TAK-003, <i>n</i> = 2; placebo, <i>n</i> = 2), five in spontaneous abortions (TAK-003, <i>n</i> = 3; placebo, <i>n</i> = 2) and one unknown outcome (placebo).Of the spontaneous abortions, there was no significant difference between TAK-003 and placebo recipients, or between those occurring within or outside the exposure window. Six participants who received TAK-003 in the exposure window and two neonates experienced serious AEs; none were considered TAK-003 related.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This post-hoc analysis found no evidence of increased adverse pregnancy outcomes following unintentional TAK-003 vaccination occurring inside the exposure window compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The clinical trials from which data were extracted are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifiers are NCT02193087, NCT01511250, NCT02302066, NCT02425098, NCT03746015, NCT02747927, NCT03999996, NCT03423173, NCT03342898, NCT03771963, NCT04313244, NCT02948829, NCT035252119, NCT03341637).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Vaccines\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"221-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2480297\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2480297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:怀孕期间禁忌使用四价登革热疫苗TAK-003。孕妇被排除在TAK-003临床研究之外;然而,有些怀孕是无意中发生的。研究设计和方法:这项对2期和3期研究的事后分析,评估了在妇女可能怀孕的时间段(“暴露窗口”)(最后一次月经前44天内)意外接种疫苗后的妊娠结局和新生儿不良事件(ae)。结果:557例妊娠报告中38例(TAK-003, n = 28/375;安慰剂(n = 10/182)发生在暴露窗内。其中28例(TAK-003, n = 23;安慰剂组,n = 5)导致活产,4例导致选择性终止妊娠(TAK-003, n = 2;安慰剂组,n = 2),自然流产组5例(TAK-003, n = 3;安慰剂,n = 2)和一个未知结果(安慰剂)。在自然流产方面,服用TAK-003的母亲和服用安慰剂的母亲之间,以及在暴露窗口内外发生的流产之间,没有显著差异;没有人认为TAK-003相关。结论:本事后分析发现,与安慰剂相比,在暴露窗口内无意接种TAK-003疫苗后,没有证据表明不良妊娠结局增加。临床试验注册:提取数据的临床试验在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册(标识符为NCT02193087、NCT01511250、NCT02302066、NCT02425098、NCT03746015、NCT02747927、NCT03999996、NCT03423173、NCT03342898、NCT03771963、NCT04313244、NCT02948829、NCT035252119、NCT03341637)。
Pregnancy outcomes following unintentional exposure to TAK-003, a live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine.
Background: The tetravalent dengue vaccine TAK-003 is contraindicated during pregnancy. Pregnant women were excluded from TAK-003 clinical studies; however, some pregnancies occurred unintentionally.
Research design and methods: This post-hoc analysis of phase 2 and 3 studies, evaluated pregnancy outcomes and neonatal adverse events (AEs) following unintentional vaccination during the time period ('exposure window') when women could be pregnant (within 44 days before last menstrual period until the outcome of pregnancy).
Results: Of the 557 reported pregnancies, 38 (TAK-003, n = 28/375; placebo, n = 10/182) occurred inside the exposure window. Of these, 28 (TAK-003, n = 23; placebo, n = 5) resulted in live births, four resulted in elective terminations (TAK-003, n = 2; placebo, n = 2), five in spontaneous abortions (TAK-003, n = 3; placebo, n = 2) and one unknown outcome (placebo).Of the spontaneous abortions, there was no significant difference between TAK-003 and placebo recipients, or between those occurring within or outside the exposure window. Six participants who received TAK-003 in the exposure window and two neonates experienced serious AEs; none were considered TAK-003 related.
Conclusions: This post-hoc analysis found no evidence of increased adverse pregnancy outcomes following unintentional TAK-003 vaccination occurring inside the exposure window compared with placebo.
Clinical trial registration: The clinical trials from which data were extracted are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifiers are NCT02193087, NCT01511250, NCT02302066, NCT02425098, NCT03746015, NCT02747927, NCT03999996, NCT03423173, NCT03342898, NCT03771963, NCT04313244, NCT02948829, NCT035252119, NCT03341637).
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.