除草剂配方和扩散剂对大黄蜂喷雾和接触后存活率的影响。

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecotoxicology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s10646-025-02876-x
Ryleigh V Gelles, Thomas S Davis
{"title":"除草剂配方和扩散剂对大黄蜂喷雾和接触后存活率的影响。","authors":"Ryleigh V Gelles, Thomas S Davis","doi":"10.1007/s10646-025-02876-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surfactants are often included as co-formulants in the application of herbicides to aid in spreading and adherence to plant surfaces, but toxicity to native bees has not been extensively tested. In a set of progressive experiments, we evaluated effects of products containing glyphosate and spreading agents, as well as spreading agents alone, on bumblebees (Bombus impatiens Cresson) using parametric survival analysis. We test spreaders from multiple chemical classes including Silwet L-77© (trisiloxane), Alligare 90© (polyoxyethylene), and Southern Ag SA-50© (C10-16 alcohols). We report low lethality of high-glyphosate herbicide formulations (Rodeo©), but bee mortality increased ~20% with addition of a silicone-based spreading agent (Silwet L-77©). Spreaders alone strongly affected bee survival: effects were concentration-specific and did not differ depending on exposure method (spray application vs. application to surfaces contacted by bees). The widely used trisiloxane-based spreader Silwet L-77© was especially hazardous, and exposure to high concentrations of Silwet L-77© caused rapid and near-total mortality in B. impatiens. Analysis of whole-bee cuticle extracts after exposure revealed clear differences in the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles associated with exposure to spreading agents: the alkane n-hexacosane was present in all extracts but was detected in greater relative abundance from bees exposed to Silwet L-77© and Alligare 90©. To support wild bee conservation efforts, we recommend substituting alcohol-based spreaders for siloxane-based spreaders when possible. In addition, certain cuticular hydrocarbons may be useful as biomarkers of previous exposure to certain surfactants, which can aid investigations evaluating causes of bumblebee decline across landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":"736-745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of herbicide formulations and spreading agents on survival of the bumblebee Bombus impatiens following spray and contact exposure.\",\"authors\":\"Ryleigh V Gelles, Thomas S Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10646-025-02876-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surfactants are often included as co-formulants in the application of herbicides to aid in spreading and adherence to plant surfaces, but toxicity to native bees has not been extensively tested. In a set of progressive experiments, we evaluated effects of products containing glyphosate and spreading agents, as well as spreading agents alone, on bumblebees (Bombus impatiens Cresson) using parametric survival analysis. We test spreaders from multiple chemical classes including Silwet L-77© (trisiloxane), Alligare 90© (polyoxyethylene), and Southern Ag SA-50© (C10-16 alcohols). We report low lethality of high-glyphosate herbicide formulations (Rodeo©), but bee mortality increased ~20% with addition of a silicone-based spreading agent (Silwet L-77©). Spreaders alone strongly affected bee survival: effects were concentration-specific and did not differ depending on exposure method (spray application vs. application to surfaces contacted by bees). The widely used trisiloxane-based spreader Silwet L-77© was especially hazardous, and exposure to high concentrations of Silwet L-77© caused rapid and near-total mortality in B. impatiens. Analysis of whole-bee cuticle extracts after exposure revealed clear differences in the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles associated with exposure to spreading agents: the alkane n-hexacosane was present in all extracts but was detected in greater relative abundance from bees exposed to Silwet L-77© and Alligare 90©. To support wild bee conservation efforts, we recommend substituting alcohol-based spreaders for siloxane-based spreaders when possible. In addition, certain cuticular hydrocarbons may be useful as biomarkers of previous exposure to certain surfactants, which can aid investigations evaluating causes of bumblebee decline across landscapes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"736-745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-025-02876-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-025-02876-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

表面活性剂通常作为共配方剂加入除草剂的应用中,以帮助扩散和附着在植物表面,但对本地蜜蜂的毒性尚未得到广泛测试。在一系列渐进式实验中,我们利用参数生存分析评估了含有草甘膦和传播剂的产品以及单独传播剂对大黄蜂(Bombus impatiens Cresson)的影响。我们测试了多种化学类别的涂布剂,包括Silwet L-77©(三硅氧烷),alligator 90©(聚氧乙烯)和Southern Ag SA-50©(C10-16醇)。我们报告了高草甘膦除草剂配方的低致死率(Rodeo©),但添加硅基扩散剂(Silwet L-77©)后蜜蜂死亡率增加了约20%。单独使用喷雾剂会强烈影响蜜蜂的生存:效果是浓度特异性的,并且不取决于暴露方法(喷雾施用与蜜蜂接触的表面施用)。广泛使用的三硅氧烷基散布剂银湿L-77©危害特别大,暴露于高浓度银湿L-77©可使凤仙花迅速死亡,几乎全部死亡。暴露后对全蜜蜂角质层提取物的分析显示,与暴露于扩散剂相关的角质层碳氢化合物分布存在明显差异:所有提取物中都存在正己烷,但暴露于Silwet L-77©和Alligare 90©的蜜蜂中检测到的相对丰度更高。为了支持野生蜜蜂的保护工作,我们建议在可能的情况下用基于酒精的扩散剂代替基于硅氧烷的扩散剂。此外,某些表皮碳氢化合物可能是有用的生物标志物,以前暴露于某些表面活性剂,这可以帮助调查评估大黄蜂在景观中减少的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of herbicide formulations and spreading agents on survival of the bumblebee Bombus impatiens following spray and contact exposure.

Evaluation of herbicide formulations and spreading agents on survival of the bumblebee Bombus impatiens following spray and contact exposure.

Evaluation of herbicide formulations and spreading agents on survival of the bumblebee Bombus impatiens following spray and contact exposure.

Evaluation of herbicide formulations and spreading agents on survival of the bumblebee Bombus impatiens following spray and contact exposure.

Surfactants are often included as co-formulants in the application of herbicides to aid in spreading and adherence to plant surfaces, but toxicity to native bees has not been extensively tested. In a set of progressive experiments, we evaluated effects of products containing glyphosate and spreading agents, as well as spreading agents alone, on bumblebees (Bombus impatiens Cresson) using parametric survival analysis. We test spreaders from multiple chemical classes including Silwet L-77© (trisiloxane), Alligare 90© (polyoxyethylene), and Southern Ag SA-50© (C10-16 alcohols). We report low lethality of high-glyphosate herbicide formulations (Rodeo©), but bee mortality increased ~20% with addition of a silicone-based spreading agent (Silwet L-77©). Spreaders alone strongly affected bee survival: effects were concentration-specific and did not differ depending on exposure method (spray application vs. application to surfaces contacted by bees). The widely used trisiloxane-based spreader Silwet L-77© was especially hazardous, and exposure to high concentrations of Silwet L-77© caused rapid and near-total mortality in B. impatiens. Analysis of whole-bee cuticle extracts after exposure revealed clear differences in the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles associated with exposure to spreading agents: the alkane n-hexacosane was present in all extracts but was detected in greater relative abundance from bees exposed to Silwet L-77© and Alligare 90©. To support wild bee conservation efforts, we recommend substituting alcohol-based spreaders for siloxane-based spreaders when possible. In addition, certain cuticular hydrocarbons may be useful as biomarkers of previous exposure to certain surfactants, which can aid investigations evaluating causes of bumblebee decline across landscapes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信