西罗莫司对肾移植受者长期不良心血管结局的影响:一项全国性队列研究。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jinhyun Park, Wonhui Choi, Jinseub Hwang, Ha Young Jang, Yun Kim, Young-Mi Ah, Jin-Won Kwon, Kyung Hee Choi, Yun-Kyoung Song
{"title":"西罗莫司对肾移植受者长期不良心血管结局的影响:一项全国性队列研究。","authors":"Jinhyun Park, Wonhui Choi, Jinseub Hwang, Ha Young Jang, Yun Kim, Young-Mi Ah, Jin-Won Kwon, Kyung Hee Choi, Yun-Kyoung Song","doi":"10.1111/eci.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease due to the long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy. This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular outcomes in Korean KTRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a cohort of 7180 eligible KTRs identified from 2010 to 2021, 387 KTRs who received sirolimus were included. To control for confounding variables, propensity score matching was applied, and the landmark method was used to address immortal time bias. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed no significant difference in MACE between the sirolimus-treated and untreated groups (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, .77-2.55), despite a higher incidence of dyslipidaemia in the sirolimus-treated group. However, subgroup analysis revealed an increased MACE risk in KTRs with pre-transplant congestive heart failure (CHF) who were treated with sirolimus (hazard ratio, 6.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-21.74), while no significant differences were found in other subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while sirolimus can be a viable option for immunosuppression, it should be used cautiously in those with pre-existing CHF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e70027"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of sirolimus on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: A nationwide cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jinhyun Park, Wonhui Choi, Jinseub Hwang, Ha Young Jang, Yun Kim, Young-Mi Ah, Jin-Won Kwon, Kyung Hee Choi, Yun-Kyoung Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eci.70027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease due to the long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy. This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular outcomes in Korean KTRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a cohort of 7180 eligible KTRs identified from 2010 to 2021, 387 KTRs who received sirolimus were included. To control for confounding variables, propensity score matching was applied, and the landmark method was used to address immortal time bias. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed no significant difference in MACE between the sirolimus-treated and untreated groups (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, .77-2.55), despite a higher incidence of dyslipidaemia in the sirolimus-treated group. However, subgroup analysis revealed an increased MACE risk in KTRs with pre-transplant congestive heart failure (CHF) who were treated with sirolimus (hazard ratio, 6.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-21.74), while no significant differences were found in other subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while sirolimus can be a viable option for immunosuppression, it should be used cautiously in those with pre-existing CHF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.70027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾移植受者(KTRs)由于长期使用免疫抑制治疗而处于心血管疾病的高风险。本研究旨在评估西罗莫司对韩国ktr患者心血管结局的长期影响。方法:从2010年至2021年确定的7180例符合条件的KTRs队列中,纳入387例接受西罗莫司治疗的KTRs。为了控制混杂变量,采用倾向得分匹配,并使用地标法来解决不朽的时间偏差。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),定义为心肌梗死、冠状动脉血运重建术、缺血性卒中和全因死亡率的复合。结果:分析显示西罗莫司治疗组与未治疗组的MACE无显著差异(风险比为1.40;95%可信区间,0.77 -2.55),尽管西罗莫司治疗组的血脂异常发生率较高。然而,亚组分析显示,移植前患有充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的KTRs患者接受西罗莫司治疗的MACE风险增加(风险比,6.22;95%可信区间(1.78 ~ 21.74),而其他亚组间无显著差异。结论:这些发现表明,虽然西罗莫司可以作为免疫抑制的可行选择,但对于已存在的CHF患者应谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of sirolimus on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: A nationwide cohort study.

Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease due to the long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy. This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular outcomes in Korean KTRs.

Methods: From a cohort of 7180 eligible KTRs identified from 2010 to 2021, 387 KTRs who received sirolimus were included. To control for confounding variables, propensity score matching was applied, and the landmark method was used to address immortal time bias. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality.

Results: The analysis showed no significant difference in MACE between the sirolimus-treated and untreated groups (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, .77-2.55), despite a higher incidence of dyslipidaemia in the sirolimus-treated group. However, subgroup analysis revealed an increased MACE risk in KTRs with pre-transplant congestive heart failure (CHF) who were treated with sirolimus (hazard ratio, 6.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-21.74), while no significant differences were found in other subgroups.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that while sirolimus can be a viable option for immunosuppression, it should be used cautiously in those with pre-existing CHF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信