Thomas H Dierikx, Douwe H Visser, Tim de Meij, James Versalovic, Mariska Mg Leeflang, Chris Cooper, Mohan Pammi
{"title":"诊断新生儿败血症的分子检测:诊断测试准确性综述。","authors":"Thomas H Dierikx, Douwe H Visser, Tim de Meij, James Versalovic, Mariska Mg Leeflang, Chris Cooper, Mohan Pammi","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD011926.pub3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microbial cultures for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis have low sensitivity and reporting delay. Advances in molecular microbiology have fostered new molecular assays that are rapid and may improve neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of various molecular methods for the diagnosis of culture-positive bacterial and fungal sepsis in neonates and to explore heterogeneity among studies by analyzing subgroups classified by gestational age and type of sepsis onset and compare molecular tests with one another.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries in August 2023. We checked reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews where subject matter related to the intervention or population examined in this review.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included studies that were prospective or retrospective, cohort or cross-sectional design, which evaluated molecular assays (index test) in neonates with suspected sepsis in comparison with microbial cultures (reference standard).</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. We performed meta-analyses using the bivariate model and entered data into Review Manager.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Seventy-four studies were eligible for inclusion, of which 68 studies provided data for meta-analysis. The total number of participants was 14,309 (1328 infants who were culture-positive and 12,981 infants who were culture-negative) from 68 studies that were included in the meta-analysis. The summary estimate of sensitivity was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.95) and of specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92) (low-certainty evidence). We explored heterogeneity by subgroup analyses of type of test, gestational age, type of sepsis onset and prevalence of sepsis. We found insufficient explanations for the heterogeneity (low- to very low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analyses including studies that analyzed blood samples, using good methodology and those that did not use multiple samples from the same participant revealed similar results (low-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>Molecular assays have the advantage of producing rapid results and have moderate diagnostic accuracy. Molecular assays may prevent overuse of antibiotics in neonates with suspected sepsis. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these molecular assays should be evaluated using randomized trials comparing molecular assays as an add-on test versus conventional methods without the add-on test in neonates with suspected sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"3 ","pages":"CD011926"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates: a diagnostic test accuracy review.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas H Dierikx, Douwe H Visser, Tim de Meij, James Versalovic, Mariska Mg Leeflang, Chris Cooper, Mohan Pammi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/14651858.CD011926.pub3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microbial cultures for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis have low sensitivity and reporting delay. Advances in molecular microbiology have fostered new molecular assays that are rapid and may improve neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of various molecular methods for the diagnosis of culture-positive bacterial and fungal sepsis in neonates and to explore heterogeneity among studies by analyzing subgroups classified by gestational age and type of sepsis onset and compare molecular tests with one another.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries in August 2023. We checked reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews where subject matter related to the intervention or population examined in this review.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included studies that were prospective or retrospective, cohort or cross-sectional design, which evaluated molecular assays (index test) in neonates with suspected sepsis in comparison with microbial cultures (reference standard).</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. We performed meta-analyses using the bivariate model and entered data into Review Manager.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Seventy-four studies were eligible for inclusion, of which 68 studies provided data for meta-analysis. The total number of participants was 14,309 (1328 infants who were culture-positive and 12,981 infants who were culture-negative) from 68 studies that were included in the meta-analysis. The summary estimate of sensitivity was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.95) and of specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92) (low-certainty evidence). We explored heterogeneity by subgroup analyses of type of test, gestational age, type of sepsis onset and prevalence of sepsis. We found insufficient explanations for the heterogeneity (low- to very low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analyses including studies that analyzed blood samples, using good methodology and those that did not use multiple samples from the same participant revealed similar results (low-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>Molecular assays have the advantage of producing rapid results and have moderate diagnostic accuracy. Molecular assays may prevent overuse of antibiotics in neonates with suspected sepsis. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these molecular assays should be evaluated using randomized trials comparing molecular assays as an add-on test versus conventional methods without the add-on test in neonates with suspected sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"CD011926\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011926.pub3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011926.pub3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:微生物培养诊断新生儿败血症敏感性低,报告延迟。分子微生物学的进步促进了新的快速分子检测,可以改善新生儿的预后。目的:通过对不同分子检测方法对培养阳性新生儿细菌和真菌脓毒症的诊断准确性进行评估,并通过对胎龄和脓毒症发病类型进行亚组分析,探讨各研究之间的异质性,比较分子检测方法之间的差异。检索方法:检索了2023年8月CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase和试验注册库。我们检查了纳入研究和系统综述的参考文献列表,其中的主题与本综述中所检查的干预措施或人群有关。选择标准:我们纳入了前瞻性或回顾性、队列或横断面设计的研究,这些研究评估了疑似脓毒症新生儿的分子测定(指数试验)与微生物培养(参考标准)的比较。数据收集和分析:两位综述作者独立筛选研究,提取数据并评估研究的方法学质量。我们使用双变量模型进行meta分析,并将数据输入Review Manager。主要结果:74项研究符合纳入条件,其中68项研究为meta分析提供数据。meta分析共纳入68项研究的14309名参与者(1328名培养阳性婴儿和12981名培养阴性婴儿)。敏感性的总估计为0.91(95%可信区间(CI) 0.85 ~ 0.95),特异性的总估计为0.88 (95% CI 0.83 ~ 0.92)(低确定性证据)。我们通过测试类型、胎龄、脓毒症发病类型和脓毒症患病率的亚组分析来探讨异质性。我们发现对异质性的解释不足(低到极低确定性的证据)。敏感性分析包括使用良好方法分析血液样本的研究和未使用来自同一参与者的多个样本的研究,结果相似(低确定性证据)。作者的结论:分子检测具有产生快速结果和具有中等诊断准确性的优势。分子检测可以防止疑似败血症的新生儿过度使用抗生素。在疑似脓毒症的新生儿中,应该通过随机试验比较分子检测作为附加检测与不加附加检测的常规方法,来评估这些分子检测的疗效和成本效益。
Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates: a diagnostic test accuracy review.
Background: Microbial cultures for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis have low sensitivity and reporting delay. Advances in molecular microbiology have fostered new molecular assays that are rapid and may improve neonatal outcomes.
Objectives: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of various molecular methods for the diagnosis of culture-positive bacterial and fungal sepsis in neonates and to explore heterogeneity among studies by analyzing subgroups classified by gestational age and type of sepsis onset and compare molecular tests with one another.
Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries in August 2023. We checked reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews where subject matter related to the intervention or population examined in this review.
Selection criteria: We included studies that were prospective or retrospective, cohort or cross-sectional design, which evaluated molecular assays (index test) in neonates with suspected sepsis in comparison with microbial cultures (reference standard).
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. We performed meta-analyses using the bivariate model and entered data into Review Manager.
Main results: Seventy-four studies were eligible for inclusion, of which 68 studies provided data for meta-analysis. The total number of participants was 14,309 (1328 infants who were culture-positive and 12,981 infants who were culture-negative) from 68 studies that were included in the meta-analysis. The summary estimate of sensitivity was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.95) and of specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92) (low-certainty evidence). We explored heterogeneity by subgroup analyses of type of test, gestational age, type of sepsis onset and prevalence of sepsis. We found insufficient explanations for the heterogeneity (low- to very low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analyses including studies that analyzed blood samples, using good methodology and those that did not use multiple samples from the same participant revealed similar results (low-certainty evidence).
Authors' conclusions: Molecular assays have the advantage of producing rapid results and have moderate diagnostic accuracy. Molecular assays may prevent overuse of antibiotics in neonates with suspected sepsis. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these molecular assays should be evaluated using randomized trials comparing molecular assays as an add-on test versus conventional methods without the add-on test in neonates with suspected sepsis.
期刊介绍:
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.