基于临床资料和超声信息的妊娠早期妊娠糖尿病(GDM)风险预测:一种线图。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Tong Zhu, Lin Tang, Man Qin, Wen-Wen Wang, Ling Chen
{"title":"基于临床资料和超声信息的妊娠早期妊娠糖尿病(GDM)风险预测:一种线图。","authors":"Tong Zhu, Lin Tang, Man Qin, Wen-Wen Wang, Ling Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02962-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complications during pregnancy and has been on a continuous increase in recent years. This study aimed to establish a combined prediction model for the risk of GDM and to provide more reliable reference information for non-invasive assessment of GDM in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively collected clinical data and ultrasound information of 122 pregnant women who underwent fetal nuchal translucency screening, which divided into 36 cases of the GDM group and 86 cases of the non-gestational diabetes mellitus(NGDM) group. The collected clinical data and ultrasound information were analyzed using Student's t-test and Wilcoxon W test for univariate analysis. Independent risk factors for patients with GDM were screened through binary logistic regression analysis. A model was established based on the screened results, and the diagnostic performance of different models was evaluated by drawing the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC). The optimal prediction model was selected, and the calibration curve and clinical decision curve were drawn to evaluate the goodness of fit and clinical application efficiency of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate results showed that age, body mass index(BMI), number of abortions, gravidity, placental volume(PV), vascularization index(VI), flow index(FI), and vascularization flow index(VFI) all had statistically significant differences between the GDM and NGDM groups(p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that BMI, number of abortions, PV, VI, and FI were independent risk factors for the development of GDM in pregnant women (p < 0.05). Based on these results, five prediction models were established in this study. Their area under the ROC curve(AUC) were 0.67, 0.80, 0.80, 0.87, and 0.85, respectively. The model combining clinical data with 30° ultrasound data had the highest AUC, so we constructed a nomogram for this model. The results of its calibration curve showed that the model had a good fit, and the results of the clinical decision curve showed that the model had good clinical application efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nomogram model combining clinical data with 30° ultrasound data has good accuracy and clinical application value for predicting the risk of GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) risk in early pregnancy based on clinical data and ultrasound information: a nomogram.\",\"authors\":\"Tong Zhu, Lin Tang, Man Qin, Wen-Wen Wang, Ling Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-025-02962-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complications during pregnancy and has been on a continuous increase in recent years. This study aimed to establish a combined prediction model for the risk of GDM and to provide more reliable reference information for non-invasive assessment of GDM in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively collected clinical data and ultrasound information of 122 pregnant women who underwent fetal nuchal translucency screening, which divided into 36 cases of the GDM group and 86 cases of the non-gestational diabetes mellitus(NGDM) group. The collected clinical data and ultrasound information were analyzed using Student's t-test and Wilcoxon W test for univariate analysis. Independent risk factors for patients with GDM were screened through binary logistic regression analysis. A model was established based on the screened results, and the diagnostic performance of different models was evaluated by drawing the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC). The optimal prediction model was selected, and the calibration curve and clinical decision curve were drawn to evaluate the goodness of fit and clinical application efficiency of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate results showed that age, body mass index(BMI), number of abortions, gravidity, placental volume(PV), vascularization index(VI), flow index(FI), and vascularization flow index(VFI) all had statistically significant differences between the GDM and NGDM groups(p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that BMI, number of abortions, PV, VI, and FI were independent risk factors for the development of GDM in pregnant women (p < 0.05). Based on these results, five prediction models were established in this study. Their area under the ROC curve(AUC) were 0.67, 0.80, 0.80, 0.87, and 0.85, respectively. The model combining clinical data with 30° ultrasound data had the highest AUC, so we constructed a nomogram for this model. The results of its calibration curve showed that the model had a good fit, and the results of the clinical decision curve showed that the model had good clinical application efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nomogram model combining clinical data with 30° ultrasound data has good accuracy and clinical application value for predicting the risk of GDM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02962-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02962-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是妊娠期最常见的并发症之一,近年来发病率呈持续上升趋势。本研究旨在建立GDM风险的联合预测模型,为临床无创评估GDM提供更可靠的参考信息。方法:回顾性收集122例行胎儿颈部半透明筛查的孕妇的临床资料和超声资料,分为GDM组36例和非妊娠期糖尿病(NGDM)组86例。收集的临床资料和超声信息采用Student's t检验和Wilcoxon W检验进行单因素分析。通过二元logistic回归分析筛选GDM患者的独立危险因素。根据筛选结果建立模型,通过绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评价不同模型的诊断性能。选择最优预测模型,绘制校正曲线和临床决策曲线,评价模型的拟合优度和临床应用效率。结果:单因素结果显示,年龄、体重指数(BMI)、流产次数、妊娠次数、胎盘体积(PV)、血管化指数(VI)、血流指数(FI)、血管化流量指数(VFI)在GDM组与NGDM组之间的差异均有统计学意义(p)。结论:将临床资料与30°超声资料相结合的nomogram模型对预测GDM的危险性具有较好的准确性和临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) risk in early pregnancy based on clinical data and ultrasound information: a nomogram.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complications during pregnancy and has been on a continuous increase in recent years. This study aimed to establish a combined prediction model for the risk of GDM and to provide more reliable reference information for non-invasive assessment of GDM in clinical practice.

Methods: This study retrospectively collected clinical data and ultrasound information of 122 pregnant women who underwent fetal nuchal translucency screening, which divided into 36 cases of the GDM group and 86 cases of the non-gestational diabetes mellitus(NGDM) group. The collected clinical data and ultrasound information were analyzed using Student's t-test and Wilcoxon W test for univariate analysis. Independent risk factors for patients with GDM were screened through binary logistic regression analysis. A model was established based on the screened results, and the diagnostic performance of different models was evaluated by drawing the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC). The optimal prediction model was selected, and the calibration curve and clinical decision curve were drawn to evaluate the goodness of fit and clinical application efficiency of the model.

Results: Univariate results showed that age, body mass index(BMI), number of abortions, gravidity, placental volume(PV), vascularization index(VI), flow index(FI), and vascularization flow index(VFI) all had statistically significant differences between the GDM and NGDM groups(p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that BMI, number of abortions, PV, VI, and FI were independent risk factors for the development of GDM in pregnant women (p < 0.05). Based on these results, five prediction models were established in this study. Their area under the ROC curve(AUC) were 0.67, 0.80, 0.80, 0.87, and 0.85, respectively. The model combining clinical data with 30° ultrasound data had the highest AUC, so we constructed a nomogram for this model. The results of its calibration curve showed that the model had a good fit, and the results of the clinical decision curve showed that the model had good clinical application efficiency.

Conclusion: The nomogram model combining clinical data with 30° ultrasound data has good accuracy and clinical application value for predicting the risk of GDM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信