股四头肌超声图像解释的可信度评估。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Daniel P McGurren, Kaycee E Glattke, Anikar Chhabra, Sayi P Boddu, Steven K Poon, Jonathan A Flug, Joseph C Brinkman, Sara Goetzinger, Jedediah E Lee, Alyssa Nocella, Jeffrey Rogge, Arthur J De Luigi
{"title":"股四头肌超声图像解释的可信度评估。","authors":"Daniel P McGurren, Kaycee E Glattke, Anikar Chhabra, Sayi P Boddu, Steven K Poon, Jonathan A Flug, Joseph C Brinkman, Sara Goetzinger, Jedediah E Lee, Alyssa Nocella, Jeffrey Rogge, Arthur J De Luigi","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the interrater reliability between seven individuals assessing quadriceps femoris cross sectional area (CSA), echo intensity (EI), and corrected echo intensity (C-EI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective subanalysis of data collected in a randomized controlled clinical trial (IRB 19-008473. NCT ID NCT04302558). Patients aged 13 to 50 years with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear requiring surgical reconstruction were assessed for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus intermedius (VI), vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus medialis obliquis (VMO), and EI of the RF. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the quadriceps was performed by one physical therapist, and quantitative assessments were performed by four physicians and three physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians and physical therapists had good reliability for CSA of the RF (median ICC 0.86 MD and 0.84 PT), CSA of the VMO (0.82 and 0.82), and EI mean (0.92 and 0.92). RF CSA had the smallest CV (26.512.7%), whereas subcutaneous fat had the largest CV (93.3% left, 86.4% middle, 86.1% right).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate reliability between physicians and physical therapists in interpretation of ultrasound images of the quadriceps. The inconsistency demonstrates the need for a consistent training across disciplines to ensure accurate image interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Interrater Reliability for Interpretation of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Imaging of the Quadriceps Femoris.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P McGurren, Kaycee E Glattke, Anikar Chhabra, Sayi P Boddu, Steven K Poon, Jonathan A Flug, Joseph C Brinkman, Sara Goetzinger, Jedediah E Lee, Alyssa Nocella, Jeffrey Rogge, Arthur J De Luigi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the interrater reliability between seven individuals assessing quadriceps femoris cross sectional area (CSA), echo intensity (EI), and corrected echo intensity (C-EI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective subanalysis of data collected in a randomized controlled clinical trial (IRB 19-008473. NCT ID NCT04302558). Patients aged 13 to 50 years with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear requiring surgical reconstruction were assessed for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus intermedius (VI), vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus medialis obliquis (VMO), and EI of the RF. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the quadriceps was performed by one physical therapist, and quantitative assessments were performed by four physicians and three physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians and physical therapists had good reliability for CSA of the RF (median ICC 0.86 MD and 0.84 PT), CSA of the VMO (0.82 and 0.82), and EI mean (0.92 and 0.92). RF CSA had the smallest CV (26.512.7%), whereas subcutaneous fat had the largest CV (93.3% left, 86.4% middle, 86.1% right).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate reliability between physicians and physical therapists in interpretation of ultrasound images of the quadriceps. The inconsistency demonstrates the need for a consistent training across disciplines to ensure accurate image interpretation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估7个人评估股四头肌横截面积(CSA)、回波强度(EI)和校正回波强度(C-EI)的可信度。设计:对一项随机对照临床试验(IRB 19-008473)收集的数据进行回顾性亚分析。NCT编号nct04302558)。年龄13 ~ 50岁的前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂需要手术重建的患者评估股直肌(RF)、股中间肌(VI)、股外侧肌(VL)、股内侧肌(VM)和股内侧肌斜肌(VMO)的横截面积和RF的EI。四头肌的肌肉骨骼超声成像由一名物理治疗师进行,定量评估由四名内科医生和三名物理治疗师进行。结果:内科医生和物理治疗师对RF的CSA (ICC中位数为0.86 MD和0.84 PT)、VMO的CSA(中位数为0.82和0.82)和EI平均值(0.92和0.92)具有良好的可靠性。RF CSA的CV最小(26.512.7%),而皮下脂肪的CV最大(左93.3%,中86.4%,右86.1%)。结论:这些发现证明了医生和物理治疗师在解释股四头肌超声图像方面的可靠性。这种不一致表明需要跨学科的一致培训,以确保准确的图像解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Interrater Reliability for Interpretation of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Imaging of the Quadriceps Femoris.

Objective: To assess the interrater reliability between seven individuals assessing quadriceps femoris cross sectional area (CSA), echo intensity (EI), and corrected echo intensity (C-EI).

Design: A retrospective subanalysis of data collected in a randomized controlled clinical trial (IRB 19-008473. NCT ID NCT04302558). Patients aged 13 to 50 years with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear requiring surgical reconstruction were assessed for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus intermedius (VI), vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus medialis obliquis (VMO), and EI of the RF. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the quadriceps was performed by one physical therapist, and quantitative assessments were performed by four physicians and three physical therapists.

Results: Physicians and physical therapists had good reliability for CSA of the RF (median ICC 0.86 MD and 0.84 PT), CSA of the VMO (0.82 and 0.82), and EI mean (0.92 and 0.92). RF CSA had the smallest CV (26.512.7%), whereas subcutaneous fat had the largest CV (93.3% left, 86.4% middle, 86.1% right).

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate reliability between physicians and physical therapists in interpretation of ultrasound images of the quadriceps. The inconsistency demonstrates the need for a consistent training across disciplines to ensure accurate image interpretation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信