Daniel P McGurren, Kaycee E Glattke, Anikar Chhabra, Sayi P Boddu, Steven K Poon, Jonathan A Flug, Joseph C Brinkman, Sara Goetzinger, Jedediah E Lee, Alyssa Nocella, Jeffrey Rogge, Arthur J De Luigi
{"title":"股四头肌超声图像解释的可信度评估。","authors":"Daniel P McGurren, Kaycee E Glattke, Anikar Chhabra, Sayi P Boddu, Steven K Poon, Jonathan A Flug, Joseph C Brinkman, Sara Goetzinger, Jedediah E Lee, Alyssa Nocella, Jeffrey Rogge, Arthur J De Luigi","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the interrater reliability between seven individuals assessing quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area, echo intensity, and corrected echo intensity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective subanalysis of data collected in a randomized controlled clinical trial (IRB 19-008473. NCT ID NCT04302558). Patients aged 13-50 yrs with an anterior cruciate ligament tear requiring surgical reconstruction were assessed for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris, vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and vastus medialis obliquis, and echo intensity of the rectus femoris. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the quadriceps was performed by one physical therapist, and quantitative assessments were performed by four physicians and three physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians and physical therapists had good reliability for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (median interclass correlation 0.86 doctor of medicine (MD) and 0.84 physical therapist), cross-sectional area of the vastus medialis obliquis (0.82 and 0.82), and echo intensity mean (0.92 and 0.92). Rectus femoris cross-sectional area had the smallest coefficient of variation (26.512.7%), whereas subcutaneous fat had the largest coefficient of variation (93.3% left, 86.4% middle, 86.1% right).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate reliability between physicians and physical therapists in interpretation of ultrasound images of the quadriceps. The inconsistency demonstrates the need for a consistent training across disciplines to ensure accurate image interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"906-910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Interrater Reliability for Interpretation of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Imaging of the Quadriceps Femoris.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P McGurren, Kaycee E Glattke, Anikar Chhabra, Sayi P Boddu, Steven K Poon, Jonathan A Flug, Joseph C Brinkman, Sara Goetzinger, Jedediah E Lee, Alyssa Nocella, Jeffrey Rogge, Arthur J De Luigi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the interrater reliability between seven individuals assessing quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area, echo intensity, and corrected echo intensity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective subanalysis of data collected in a randomized controlled clinical trial (IRB 19-008473. NCT ID NCT04302558). Patients aged 13-50 yrs with an anterior cruciate ligament tear requiring surgical reconstruction were assessed for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris, vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and vastus medialis obliquis, and echo intensity of the rectus femoris. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the quadriceps was performed by one physical therapist, and quantitative assessments were performed by four physicians and three physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians and physical therapists had good reliability for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (median interclass correlation 0.86 doctor of medicine (MD) and 0.84 physical therapist), cross-sectional area of the vastus medialis obliquis (0.82 and 0.82), and echo intensity mean (0.92 and 0.92). Rectus femoris cross-sectional area had the smallest coefficient of variation (26.512.7%), whereas subcutaneous fat had the largest coefficient of variation (93.3% left, 86.4% middle, 86.1% right).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate reliability between physicians and physical therapists in interpretation of ultrasound images of the quadriceps. The inconsistency demonstrates the need for a consistent training across disciplines to ensure accurate image interpretation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"906-910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002731","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of Interrater Reliability for Interpretation of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Imaging of the Quadriceps Femoris.
Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the interrater reliability between seven individuals assessing quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area, echo intensity, and corrected echo intensity.
Design: A retrospective subanalysis of data collected in a randomized controlled clinical trial (IRB 19-008473. NCT ID NCT04302558). Patients aged 13-50 yrs with an anterior cruciate ligament tear requiring surgical reconstruction were assessed for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris, vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and vastus medialis obliquis, and echo intensity of the rectus femoris. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the quadriceps was performed by one physical therapist, and quantitative assessments were performed by four physicians and three physical therapists.
Results: Physicians and physical therapists had good reliability for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (median interclass correlation 0.86 doctor of medicine (MD) and 0.84 physical therapist), cross-sectional area of the vastus medialis obliquis (0.82 and 0.82), and echo intensity mean (0.92 and 0.92). Rectus femoris cross-sectional area had the smallest coefficient of variation (26.512.7%), whereas subcutaneous fat had the largest coefficient of variation (93.3% left, 86.4% middle, 86.1% right).
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate reliability between physicians and physical therapists in interpretation of ultrasound images of the quadriceps. The inconsistency demonstrates the need for a consistent training across disciplines to ensure accurate image interpretation.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).