以岩矿羊毛为主的绿色屋顶,改善城市径流水质。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gabriel Pérez, Julià Coma, Cristina Chocarro, Alejandro Juárez, Claudia Marín, Franc Rauter, Neva Zupanc, Barbara Šubic, Darja Majkovič
{"title":"以岩矿羊毛为主的绿色屋顶,改善城市径流水质。","authors":"Gabriel Pérez,&nbsp;Julià Coma,&nbsp;Cristina Chocarro,&nbsp;Alejandro Juárez,&nbsp;Claudia Marín,&nbsp;Franc Rauter,&nbsp;Neva Zupanc,&nbsp;Barbara Šubic,&nbsp;Darja Majkovič","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36232-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Green roofs are nature-based solutions that allow greenery to be integrated into the building envelope, making it possible to re-nature cities while providing multiple benefits. However, whether green roofs are a source or sink of pollution in the urban environment is still a controversy. One of the causes of the possible deterioration of the quality of runoff water from green roofs is the substrate. Green roofs based on rock mineral wool (RMW) growing media require thinner substrate layers or can even be substrate-less. In the present study, four green roof systems based on RMW have been studied over the course of 2 years. Their performance, in terms of leachate quality, has been compared with two traditional roofs, a green roof with pozzolana as a draining material and a gravel-ballasted conventional flat roof. Limit values for wastewater quality from international regulations were considered benchmark. The main conclusions were that after the first flush, which was observed for all solutions, generally exceeding the limit values, RMW-based solutions performed better than traditional solutions. Furthermore, the average values of leachates from all tested green roofs and especially those from RMW solutions fall within the limits set by international regulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"32 14","pages":"8986 - 9003"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-025-36232-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rock mineral wool–based green roofs to improve the quality of urban water runoff\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Pérez,&nbsp;Julià Coma,&nbsp;Cristina Chocarro,&nbsp;Alejandro Juárez,&nbsp;Claudia Marín,&nbsp;Franc Rauter,&nbsp;Neva Zupanc,&nbsp;Barbara Šubic,&nbsp;Darja Majkovič\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-025-36232-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Green roofs are nature-based solutions that allow greenery to be integrated into the building envelope, making it possible to re-nature cities while providing multiple benefits. However, whether green roofs are a source or sink of pollution in the urban environment is still a controversy. One of the causes of the possible deterioration of the quality of runoff water from green roofs is the substrate. Green roofs based on rock mineral wool (RMW) growing media require thinner substrate layers or can even be substrate-less. In the present study, four green roof systems based on RMW have been studied over the course of 2 years. Their performance, in terms of leachate quality, has been compared with two traditional roofs, a green roof with pozzolana as a draining material and a gravel-ballasted conventional flat roof. Limit values for wastewater quality from international regulations were considered benchmark. The main conclusions were that after the first flush, which was observed for all solutions, generally exceeding the limit values, RMW-based solutions performed better than traditional solutions. Furthermore, the average values of leachates from all tested green roofs and especially those from RMW solutions fall within the limits set by international regulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\"32 14\",\"pages\":\"8986 - 9003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-025-36232-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36232-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36232-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色屋顶是一种基于自然的解决方案,它允许绿色植物融入建筑围护结构,使城市再生成为可能,同时提供多种好处。然而,在城市环境中,绿色屋顶究竟是污染源还是污染源仍存在争议。绿色屋顶径流水质可能恶化的原因之一是基材。基于岩矿棉(RMW)生长介质的绿色屋顶需要更薄的基材层,甚至可以不需要基材。在本研究中,研究了四种基于RMW的绿色屋顶系统,历时两年。就渗滤液质量而言,它们的性能与两种传统屋顶进行了比较,一种是用火山灰作为排水材料的绿色屋顶,另一种是用砾石压载的传统平屋顶。国际法规规定的废水质量限值被视为基准。主要结论是,在第一次冲洗之后,所有溶液都观察到,通常超过限值,基于rmw的溶液比传统溶液表现更好。此外,所有测试的绿色屋顶的渗滤液,特别是RMW溶液的渗滤液的平均值都在国际规定的限制范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rock mineral wool–based green roofs to improve the quality of urban water runoff

Green roofs are nature-based solutions that allow greenery to be integrated into the building envelope, making it possible to re-nature cities while providing multiple benefits. However, whether green roofs are a source or sink of pollution in the urban environment is still a controversy. One of the causes of the possible deterioration of the quality of runoff water from green roofs is the substrate. Green roofs based on rock mineral wool (RMW) growing media require thinner substrate layers or can even be substrate-less. In the present study, four green roof systems based on RMW have been studied over the course of 2 years. Their performance, in terms of leachate quality, has been compared with two traditional roofs, a green roof with pozzolana as a draining material and a gravel-ballasted conventional flat roof. Limit values for wastewater quality from international regulations were considered benchmark. The main conclusions were that after the first flush, which was observed for all solutions, generally exceeding the limit values, RMW-based solutions performed better than traditional solutions. Furthermore, the average values of leachates from all tested green roofs and especially those from RMW solutions fall within the limits set by international regulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信