比较传统和新型奇亚籽浆液作为可持续素食增稠剂的提取方法†

Qiu Yi Tan, Divyang Solanki, Regis Badin and Sangeeta Prakash
{"title":"比较传统和新型奇亚籽浆液作为可持续素食增稠剂的提取方法†","authors":"Qiu Yi Tan, Divyang Solanki, Regis Badin and Sangeeta Prakash","doi":"10.1039/D4FB00309H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Chia seed mucilage (CSM) is a remarkable food hydrocolloid with exceptional functional properties. However, variations in extraction conditions across studies impede reliable comparisons of CSM quality. This study investigates the influence of extraction conditions on the yield, physical properties, and functional properties of non-purified CSM. Three extraction methods – regular soaking (R), hot water soaking (H), and microwave-assisted (M) – were evaluated, with R serving as the control. The H method produced the highest yield (8.45 ± 0.22%), followed by M (5.76 ± 0.42%) and R (5.23 ± 0.21%). The CSM extracted <em>via</em> H yielded a darker colour and stronger tint than R and M's milky-white appearance. Regarding moisture content, R had the highest content (10.02 ± 0.82%), followed by M (8.4 ± 0.82%) and H (6.33 ± 0.42%). All samples displayed shear-thinning flow behaviour and viscoelastic properties, with M and H showing similar viscosity, while R demonstrated higher viscosity than both. The water holding capacity of H (117.03 ± 2.31 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>) and M (108.28 ± 1.37 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>) was significantly lower than that of R (152.88 ± 5.48 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>). The oil holding capacity varied significantly among R (29.32 ± 1.11 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>), H (18.15 ± 0.09 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>), and M (25.61 ± 0.8 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>). The emulsion capacity of R (91.74 ± 2.42%) was significantly higher than those of H (85.4 ± 2.54%) and M (92.97 ± 1.72%). Microwave-based CSM has shown the highest emulsion stability (96.71 ± 0.58%), followed by R (93.25 ± 0.46%) and H (92.97 ± 1.72%). The solubility of CSM did not differ significantly among the methods (78.1–82.48%). In conclusion, our findings emphasize the significant impact of extraction methods on the overall quality of CSM.</p>","PeriodicalId":101198,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Food Technology","volume":" 2","pages":" 456-469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/fb/d4fb00309h?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing conventional and novel extraction methods for chia seed mucilage as a sustainable vegan thickening agent†\",\"authors\":\"Qiu Yi Tan, Divyang Solanki, Regis Badin and Sangeeta Prakash\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4FB00309H\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Chia seed mucilage (CSM) is a remarkable food hydrocolloid with exceptional functional properties. However, variations in extraction conditions across studies impede reliable comparisons of CSM quality. This study investigates the influence of extraction conditions on the yield, physical properties, and functional properties of non-purified CSM. Three extraction methods – regular soaking (R), hot water soaking (H), and microwave-assisted (M) – were evaluated, with R serving as the control. The H method produced the highest yield (8.45 ± 0.22%), followed by M (5.76 ± 0.42%) and R (5.23 ± 0.21%). The CSM extracted <em>via</em> H yielded a darker colour and stronger tint than R and M's milky-white appearance. Regarding moisture content, R had the highest content (10.02 ± 0.82%), followed by M (8.4 ± 0.82%) and H (6.33 ± 0.42%). All samples displayed shear-thinning flow behaviour and viscoelastic properties, with M and H showing similar viscosity, while R demonstrated higher viscosity than both. The water holding capacity of H (117.03 ± 2.31 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>) and M (108.28 ± 1.37 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>) was significantly lower than that of R (152.88 ± 5.48 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>). The oil holding capacity varied significantly among R (29.32 ± 1.11 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>), H (18.15 ± 0.09 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>), and M (25.61 ± 0.8 g g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>). The emulsion capacity of R (91.74 ± 2.42%) was significantly higher than those of H (85.4 ± 2.54%) and M (92.97 ± 1.72%). Microwave-based CSM has shown the highest emulsion stability (96.71 ± 0.58%), followed by R (93.25 ± 0.46%) and H (92.97 ± 1.72%). The solubility of CSM did not differ significantly among the methods (78.1–82.48%). In conclusion, our findings emphasize the significant impact of extraction methods on the overall quality of CSM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Food Technology\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\" 456-469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/fb/d4fb00309h?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Food Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/fb/d4fb00309h\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Food Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/fb/d4fb00309h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奇亚籽粘液(CSM)是一种具有特殊功能特性的食品水胶体。然而,不同研究中提取条件的差异阻碍了CSM质量的可靠比较。本研究考察了提取条件对未纯化CSM得率、物理性质和功能性质的影响。以常规浸泡法(R)、热水浸泡法(H)和微波辅助提取法(M)为对照,对三种提取方法进行了评价。H法得率最高(8.45±0.22%),M法次之(5.76±0.42%),R法次之(5.23±0.21%)。通过H提取的CSM产生比R和M的乳白色更深的颜色和更强的色调。水分含量以R最高(10.02±0.82%),M次之(8.4±0.82%),H为6.33±0.42%。所有样品均表现出剪切减薄流动特性和粘弹性,其中M和H具有相似的粘度,而R的粘度高于两者。H(117.03±2.31 g g−1)和M(108.28±1.37 g g−1)的持水量显著低于R(152.88±5.48 g g−1)。R(29.32±1.11 g g−1)、H(18.15±0.09 g g−1)、M(25.61±0.8 g g−1)的含油量差异显著。R的乳容量(91.74±2.42%)显著高于H(85.4±2.54%)和M(92.97±1.72%)。微波基CSM乳化稳定性最高(96.71±0.58%),其次是R(93.25±0.46%)和H(92.97±1.72%)。两种方法间CSM的溶解度差异无统计学意义(78.1-82.48%)。总之,我们的研究结果强调了提取方法对CSM整体质量的重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing conventional and novel extraction methods for chia seed mucilage as a sustainable vegan thickening agent†

Comparing conventional and novel extraction methods for chia seed mucilage as a sustainable vegan thickening agent†

Chia seed mucilage (CSM) is a remarkable food hydrocolloid with exceptional functional properties. However, variations in extraction conditions across studies impede reliable comparisons of CSM quality. This study investigates the influence of extraction conditions on the yield, physical properties, and functional properties of non-purified CSM. Three extraction methods – regular soaking (R), hot water soaking (H), and microwave-assisted (M) – were evaluated, with R serving as the control. The H method produced the highest yield (8.45 ± 0.22%), followed by M (5.76 ± 0.42%) and R (5.23 ± 0.21%). The CSM extracted via H yielded a darker colour and stronger tint than R and M's milky-white appearance. Regarding moisture content, R had the highest content (10.02 ± 0.82%), followed by M (8.4 ± 0.82%) and H (6.33 ± 0.42%). All samples displayed shear-thinning flow behaviour and viscoelastic properties, with M and H showing similar viscosity, while R demonstrated higher viscosity than both. The water holding capacity of H (117.03 ± 2.31 g g−1) and M (108.28 ± 1.37 g g−1) was significantly lower than that of R (152.88 ± 5.48 g g−1). The oil holding capacity varied significantly among R (29.32 ± 1.11 g g−1), H (18.15 ± 0.09 g g−1), and M (25.61 ± 0.8 g g−1). The emulsion capacity of R (91.74 ± 2.42%) was significantly higher than those of H (85.4 ± 2.54%) and M (92.97 ± 1.72%). Microwave-based CSM has shown the highest emulsion stability (96.71 ± 0.58%), followed by R (93.25 ± 0.46%) and H (92.97 ± 1.72%). The solubility of CSM did not differ significantly among the methods (78.1–82.48%). In conclusion, our findings emphasize the significant impact of extraction methods on the overall quality of CSM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信