微波和超声波辅助萃取黄连中酚类化合物和小檗碱的比较模型†。

Lopamudra Sarma, Falguni Patra, Pallab Kumar Borah, Sunil Meena and Raj Kumar Duary
{"title":"微波和超声波辅助萃取黄连中酚类化合物和小檗碱的比较模型†。","authors":"Lopamudra Sarma, Falguni Patra, Pallab Kumar Borah, Sunil Meena and Raj Kumar Duary","doi":"10.1039/D4FB00382A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >\r\n <em>Coptis teeta</em> rhizomes are a rich source of bioactive phytochemicals with significant applications in the food and nutraceutical industries. Standardized methods and solvent compositions are crucial to sustainably maximize bioactive yield while ensuring industrial feasibility. This study models and compares microwave (MAE) and ultrasound (UAE) assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine – the primary active alkaloid in <em>Coptis teeta</em> rhizomes. Previous studies on extracting phytochemicals from <em>Coptis teeta</em> have relied on the central composite design, which is limited in handling multiple independent variables. To address this limitation, a Box–Behnken design along with a response surface method was utilized, where independent variables included the solvent concentration (water : methanol), power level, extraction time, and solid–liquid ratio, and dependent variables were total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity. The results showed that for MAE, using 65% solvent concentration, 310 W power, 30 min extraction time, and 1 : 39 g mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small> solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 210.04 mg GAE 100 g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> and antioxidant activity of 98.57%. Whereas for UAE, 36% solvent concentration, 160 W ultrasound power, 10 min extraction time, and 1 : 78 g mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small> solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 251.11 mg GAE 100 g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> and 97.82% antioxidant activity. Berberine concentration in MAE extract was 212.18 ppm, whereas it was 162.96 ppm in UAE extract. While MAE yielded a higher berberine content, UAE was superior in extracting total phenolics. The findings provide a foundation for developing standardized methods and solvent compositions suitable for food and nutraceutical formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":101198,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Food Technology","volume":" 2","pages":" 570-581"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/fb/d4fb00382a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative modeling of microwave and ultrasound assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine from Coptis teeta Wall. rhizomes†\",\"authors\":\"Lopamudra Sarma, Falguni Patra, Pallab Kumar Borah, Sunil Meena and Raj Kumar Duary\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4FB00382A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >\\r\\n <em>Coptis teeta</em> rhizomes are a rich source of bioactive phytochemicals with significant applications in the food and nutraceutical industries. Standardized methods and solvent compositions are crucial to sustainably maximize bioactive yield while ensuring industrial feasibility. This study models and compares microwave (MAE) and ultrasound (UAE) assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine – the primary active alkaloid in <em>Coptis teeta</em> rhizomes. Previous studies on extracting phytochemicals from <em>Coptis teeta</em> have relied on the central composite design, which is limited in handling multiple independent variables. To address this limitation, a Box–Behnken design along with a response surface method was utilized, where independent variables included the solvent concentration (water : methanol), power level, extraction time, and solid–liquid ratio, and dependent variables were total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity. The results showed that for MAE, using 65% solvent concentration, 310 W power, 30 min extraction time, and 1 : 39 g mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small> solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 210.04 mg GAE 100 g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> and antioxidant activity of 98.57%. Whereas for UAE, 36% solvent concentration, 160 W ultrasound power, 10 min extraction time, and 1 : 78 g mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small> solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 251.11 mg GAE 100 g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> and 97.82% antioxidant activity. Berberine concentration in MAE extract was 212.18 ppm, whereas it was 162.96 ppm in UAE extract. While MAE yielded a higher berberine content, UAE was superior in extracting total phenolics. The findings provide a foundation for developing standardized methods and solvent compositions suitable for food and nutraceutical formulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Food Technology\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\" 570-581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/fb/d4fb00382a?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Food Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/fb/d4fb00382a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Food Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/fb/d4fb00382a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative modeling of microwave and ultrasound assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine from Coptis teeta Wall. rhizomes†

Comparative modeling of microwave and ultrasound assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine from Coptis teeta Wall. rhizomes†

Coptis teeta rhizomes are a rich source of bioactive phytochemicals with significant applications in the food and nutraceutical industries. Standardized methods and solvent compositions are crucial to sustainably maximize bioactive yield while ensuring industrial feasibility. This study models and compares microwave (MAE) and ultrasound (UAE) assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine – the primary active alkaloid in Coptis teeta rhizomes. Previous studies on extracting phytochemicals from Coptis teeta have relied on the central composite design, which is limited in handling multiple independent variables. To address this limitation, a Box–Behnken design along with a response surface method was utilized, where independent variables included the solvent concentration (water : methanol), power level, extraction time, and solid–liquid ratio, and dependent variables were total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity. The results showed that for MAE, using 65% solvent concentration, 310 W power, 30 min extraction time, and 1 : 39 g mL−1 solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 210.04 mg GAE 100 g−1 and antioxidant activity of 98.57%. Whereas for UAE, 36% solvent concentration, 160 W ultrasound power, 10 min extraction time, and 1 : 78 g mL−1 solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 251.11 mg GAE 100 g−1 and 97.82% antioxidant activity. Berberine concentration in MAE extract was 212.18 ppm, whereas it was 162.96 ppm in UAE extract. While MAE yielded a higher berberine content, UAE was superior in extracting total phenolics. The findings provide a foundation for developing standardized methods and solvent compositions suitable for food and nutraceutical formulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信